Monografia (especialização)
Reabilitação do membro superior e a funcionalidade de indivíduos pós-ave: uma revisão narrativa da literatura
Fecha
2019-07-06Autor
Camilla Regina Carvalho Costa
Institución
Resumen
Stroke is a neurological dysfunction with high incidence and prevalence in the world,
responsible for many deaths and disabilities to survivors. Among these disabilities is
the involvement of the upper limb (UL) causing great damage to the functioning of
these individuals. According to the International Classification of Functioning,
Disability and Health (ICF), functioning refers to body structures and functions,
activity and participation. The aim of this study was to perform a narrative review of
the literature on UL rehabilitation and the functioning of post-stroke individuals. We
searched the electronic databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System
Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Latin
American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS) and Scientific
Electronic Library Online (SCIELO). The eligibility criteria were: studies performed
with post-stroke individuals aged 18 years or older; studies with experimental design
that carried out an intervention aimed to rehabilitation of UL; studies which submitted
the individuals to the functioning evaluation; published until August 2018, in any
language. A total of 848 studies were found, 12 were selected and all of them were
randomized clinical trials. The included studies used 25 different measurement
instruments to assess the functioning of post-stroke individuals, and the majority of
them (n = 15, 60%) aimed to evaluate aspects related to the CIF activity domain. The
most commonly used measurement instrument was the Fugl Meyer Assessment (n =
11, 91.6%). The use of measurement instruments and interventions aimed the social
participation of post-stroke individuals was scarce. There were found 10 distinct
interventions aimed the rehabilitation of UL post-stroke. All of the studies showed
positive results regarding the improvement of the individuals functioning, however,
the interventions proposed in the experimental groups were superior when compared
to conventional therapies in the most of the studies (n = 8, 66.6%).