dc.contributor | Thomas da Rosa de Bustamante | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/9752509896150589 | |
dc.contributor | Misabel de Abreu Machado Derzi | |
dc.contributor | Saulo Monteiro Martinho de Matos | |
dc.contributor | Patrícia Perrone Campos Mello | |
dc.contributor | Joana de Souza Machado | |
dc.creator | Ana Luísa de Navarro Moreira | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-03T22:46:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-03T22:46:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-14 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/35846 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3810208 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis proposes a philosophically based interpretation of freedom of
religion in Brazilian law. Recognizing the complexity of protecting religion via a freedom
right, interpretations are proposed that contribute to the intelligibility of certain legal
and philosophical issues surrounding the theme of freedom of religion, reflecting on
the context in which religion occurs and, at the same time, the practice of Brazilian law
is consolidated. Thus, this thesis philosophically questions the freedom of religion,
addressing it specifically in Brazil, taking into account the legal arguments consolidated
within the scope of the Judiciary, through the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court,
and, also, within the scope of the Legislative Branch, through the fundamentals
underlying the proposition of certain bills. Based on the reflection made on these
arguments and based on the theoretical proposals of Ronald Dworkin, it was intended
to answer the following questions: is Ronald Dworkin's conception of freedom a proper
normative conception to explain the practice of Brazilian law? Does his theory provide
a good theoretical apparatus to reflect and problematize this practice? Questioning the
practice from its theoretical assumptions, should freedom of religion be a special right
distinct from freedom of conscience in the sense that Dworkin proposes that freedom
of expression should be? What are the implications of an answer, negative or positive,
to the previous question, for the following dilemmas of political morality under Brazilian
law: tax immunity, free exercise and conscientious objection and religious education?
It is noteworthy that such dilemmas were selected through the “chain novel” that was
built by the detailed analysis of the STF's jurisprudence on the subject from the
promulgation of the current Constitution. The answers to these questions make up a
normative theory of freedom of religion, considering the role that religion plays in
Brazilian law from the social-argumentative practice that it uses legally among us. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito | |
dc.publisher | UFMG | |
dc.rights | Acesso Restrito | |
dc.subject | Liberdade de religião | |
dc.subject | Ronald Dworkin | |
dc.subject | Direito Especial | |
dc.subject | Supremo Tribunal Federal | |
dc.subject | Liberdade de religião no Brasil | |
dc.title | Liberdade de religião: um questionamento filosófico-dworkiano da prática do direito brasileiro | |
dc.type | Tese | |