dc.creatorLeandro Martins Zanitelli
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-13T14:40:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:45:55Z
dc.date.available2021-08-13T14:40:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:45:55Z
dc.date.created2021-08-13T14:40:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier1982-0496
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/37458
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-4996
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3810099
dc.description.abstractAmong the criticisms raised against the proportionality test is the incommensurability objection, according to which the test often requires balancing incommensurable rights and is for that reason not susceptible to a rational solution. Drawing on the distinction between incommensurability and incomparability, this article addresses the importance and consequences of incomparability between alternatives to the proportionality test and to the use of Alexy’s weight formula. It concludes by stating that acceptance of a pluralist theory of rights does not entail giving up on a rational decision for conflicts of human or fundamental rights.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO E PROCESSO CIVIL E COMERCIAL
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationRevista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectProporcionalidade
dc.subjectDireitos humanos ou fundamentais
dc.subjectIncomparabilidade
dc.subjectFórmula do peso
dc.subjectAlexy
dc.subjectChang
dc.titleProporcionalidade, comparabilidade e fórmula do peso
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución