dc.creatorLeandro Martins Zanitelli
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T20:36:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:39:44Z
dc.date.available2021-08-12T20:36:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:39:44Z
dc.date.created2021-08-12T20:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v24i2.52039
dc.identifier1982-2928
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/37447
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-4996
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3807717
dc.description.abstractRawls proposes a division of labor between the institutions com-posing society’s basic structure and the rules applying directly to individuals and associations (private law, roughly speaking). The paper exposes and criti-cizes the claim that a non-distributive ideal of justice (such as an ideal of cor-rective justice) is suited for private law under Rawls’ account. It is argued that private law is a necessary condition for preserving what Rawls calls “background justice”, as well as that it can perform this role while maintain-ing a relative normative simplicity.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO E PROCESSO CIVIL E COMERCIAL
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationPhilosóphos - Revista de Filosofia
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectDireito privado
dc.subjectRawls
dc.subjectDivisão institucional do trabalho
dc.subjectJustiça distributiva
dc.subjectJustiça corretiva
dc.titleDireito privado e justiça: o argumento da divisão institucional do trabalho
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución