dc.creatorGláucio Ferreira Maciel Gonçalves
dc.creatorFernanda Loures de Oliveira
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T19:01:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:16:37Z
dc.date.available2022-02-08T19:01:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:16:37Z
dc.date.created2022-02-08T19:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2525-9679/2019.v5i1.5538
dc.identifier2525-9679
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/39309
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-5897
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8312-2211
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3797918
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to demonstrate the necessity to establish actual incentives to conciliation and mediation in order to overcome the culture of litigation. Court numbers show that the mere prediction of a phase for attempting a consensual solution in the civil procedure is not enough to create a real incentive for agreement. The methodology is based on literature review, the exam of important works and recent court numbers. We also compare the Brazilian, Italian and Portuguese legislation. The relevance of the study derives from the importance of promoting consensus-based methods to reduce the current overload of the Judiciary, ensuring efficiency.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO E PROCESSO CIVIL E COMERCIAL
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationRevista de Formas Consensuais de Solução De Conflitos
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectMediação
dc.subjectMeios alternativos
dc.subjectSolução de conflitos
dc.subjectConciliação
dc.subjectNormas indutoras
dc.subjectSanção premial
dc.titleMediação e conciliação: a necessária previsão de um real incentivo
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución