dc.creatorAmaro de Oliveira Fleck
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T13:02:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:14:03Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T13:02:16Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:14:03Z
dc.date.created2021-12-07T13:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2017v24n44ID12083
dc.identifier1983-2109
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/38815
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7710-9141
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3796606
dc.description.abstractThe project of the critical theory of society has been defined in different ways: through the description of its genesis, of its methodology or of its institutional history. This paper analyzes each of these possibi-lities and suggests an alternative to them, namely, that critical theory can be understood as the attempt to deal with a problem: that of the ongoing division and compartmentalization of scientific work. This alternative also makes it possible to understand in another way the rupture operated by the epistemic turn of the late 1960s.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationPrincípios
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectTeoria crítica
dc.subjectHistória da filosofia contemporânea
dc.subjectTeoria social
dc.subjectMax Horkheimer
dc.subjectTheodor W. Adorno
dc.titleAfinal de contas, o que é teoria crítica?
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución