| dc.description.abstract | Abstract: This book has three intersecting goals. First, it aims to provide the tools necessary
for a comparative, in-depth study of “wordplay” in ancient Near Eastern
texts. Second, it aspires to establish comprehensive taxonomies for the many
kinds of devices that scholars have labeled as “wordplay” and for their proposed
functions. Finally, it seeks to establish a consistent terminology that will offer
students and scholars of ancient Near Eastern languages a useful template for
documenting and understanding the devices they discover, and scholars of other
disciplines access to the sophisticated devices of ancient Near Eastern writers.
This, I hope, will lead to greater precision and interdisciplinary dialogue.
The astute reader will notice that I have placed the term “wordplay” in quotation
marks. It is my contention that the term is problematic for many reasons,
which I discuss in chapter 1. Nevertheless, I find it heuristically useful in communicating
to those outside the discipline what sorts of devices this book will
examine, even if the devices differ in technique and their functions and social
contexts appear alien.
Readers also will note that I have opted to use the word texts, in the title rather
than literature. There are two reasons for this. First, one finds “wordplay”
in texts of all kinds, including annals, letters, law codes, medical prescriptions,
omen lists, and ritual descriptions. In fact, there appear to be no generic or
chronological restrictions to the application of “wordplay” in the ancient Near
East. A second reason is that the social background of textual production, which
I discuss in the chapter 2, strongly suggests that many forms of “wordplay” have
an illocutionary function. Thus “wordplay” is often as much a performative phenomenon
as a literary one.
It is rather ironic that the presence of “wordplay” in ancient Near Eastern
texts has been recognized for many years—in the case of the Hebrew Bible, for
several centuries. Yet, large-scale publications on the phenomenon are rare. In
addition, though we have benefitted from numerous articles on the subject, most
have focused on select biblical passages rather than books. Moreover, until recently,
most scholars were content merely to illustrate examples without discussing their functions, generic environments, or literary and social contexts.
Consequently, despite the long-standing recognition, it is fair to say that many
aspects of “wordplay” in ancient Near Eastern texts remain largely unexplored.
Moreover, the disciplines represented in this study have long suffered from
a vague, inconsistent, and, at times, even contradictory vocabulary that has done
little to advance the study of the phenomena and all their permutations and effects.
Consequently, many publications employ only the most basic terms for a
number of devices that deserve individual attention. Thus, we find studies on
alliteration that more accurately contain cases of homoeopropheron, homoioteleuton,
parasonance, and the like, and publications on punning that ignore the
visual register and do not distinguish devices of sound from those of meaning. It
is my hope that this monograph will provide tools for advancing the comparative
study of these phenomena with greater accuracy. | |
