dc.creator | Ñustes Barrera, Anyela del Carmen | |
dc.creator | Martínez Cruz, | |
dc.creator | Acuña Acuña, Lourdes María | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-09T20:01:18Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-01T18:58:18Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-29T14:35:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-09T20:01:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-01T18:58:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-29T14:35:20Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-11-09T20:01:18Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-10-01T18:58:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier | http://revistas.escuelaing.edu.co/index.php/idgip/article/view/3/41 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/852 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3775663 | |
dc.description.abstract | Durante la última década, muchas organizaciones han implementado uno o más Oficinas de Gestión de Proyectos (PMO) como parte de la gestión de los proyectos, atribuyéndole una variedad de funciones tanto operacionales como estratégicas (Monique, Ralf, Brian, & Tomas, 2010). Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, se considera que, para las organizaciones que implementan una PMO es importante conocer los aportes que esta puede generar en el ámbito interno, al conseguir la optimización y unificación de los procesos, así como el uso óptimo de los recursos y el aumento de la productividad. El objetivo principal de esta investigación es analizar la literatura de la gestión de los proyectos y Project Management Office (PMO), estableciendo los factores críticos de éxito que una PMO ofrece a las organizaciones de acuerdo con su contexto. Además, de recopilar los diferentes aportes que han generado varios autores sobre la aplicabilidad de una PMO a las organizaciones, y que permiten desarrollar una madurez en el ciclo de vida de los proyectos, dadas las diferentes dimensiones contextuales y estructurales que estas tienen. La metodología utilizada en esta investigación es sistemática con la búsqueda de la temática propuesta, en revistas e informes relacionados en bases de datos de referenciación bibliográfica, la construcción de una base de datos como herramienta de recopilación de información y con el análisis realizado por los autores se hace la revisión de los artículos y se establece la información más relevante. | |
dc.description.abstract | During the last decade, many organizations have implemented one or more Project Management Offices (PMOs) as part of project management, attributing a variety of operational and strategic functions (Monique, Ralf, Brian, & Tomas, 2010) . Taking into account the above, it is considered that, for organizations that implement a PMO it is important to know the contributions that this can generate in the internal scope, by achieving the optimization and unification of the processes, as well as the optimal use of resources and the increase in productivity. The main objective of this research is to analyze the literature on project management and Project Management Office (PMO), establishing the critical success factors that a PMO offers to organizations according to their context. In addition, to collect the different contributions that have generated several authors on the applicability of a PMO to organizations, and that allow develop a maturity in the life cycle of projects, given the different contextual and structural dimensions they have. The methodology used in this research is systematic with the search of the proposed topic, in journals and related reports in bibliographic reference databases, the construction of a database as a tool for gathering information and with the analysis made by the authors the review of the articles is made and the most relevant information is established. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito | |
dc.relation | Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 29(4), pp. 408-421. | |
dc.relation | Aubry, M., Hobbs, B. & Thuillier, D. (2008), “Organizational project management: an historical approach to the study of PMOs”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 (1), 38-43. | |
dc.relation | Aubry, M., Muller, R., Hobbs, B. & Blomquist, T. (2010), “Project management offices in transition”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28 (8): pp. 766-778. | |
dc.relation | Aubry, M., & Hobbs, B. (2011), “A fresh look at the contribution of project management to organizational performance”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 42 (1): pp. 3-16. | |
dc.relation | Brown, S.L. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Mar., 1997), pp. 1-34. | |
dc.relation | Curlee, W. (2008). Modern virtual project management: the effects of a centralized and decentralized project management office. Project Management Journal, 39(3), S83–S96. | |
dc.relation | Dai, C. X. & Wells, W. G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22, pp. 523-532. | |
dc.relation | Dinsmore, P.C. (1999). Winning in Business with Enterprise Project Management. Paul C. Dinsmoren, USA. | |
dc.relation | Gartner (2000). The Project Office: Teams, Processes and Tools. ID: G0091426. Gartner, Inc., USA. | |
dc.relation | Hill, G. M. (2008). The Complete Project Management Office Handbook. 2nd edition. New York, Auerbach Publications. | |
dc.relation | Hobbs, J. B. & Aubry, M. (2007). A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): the results of phase I. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 74–86. | |
dc.relation | Hofman, M. (2014). Models of PMO functioning in a multi-project environment. Procedia – Social and Beha-vioral Sciences, 119(3), pp. 46-54. | |
dc.relation | Houda, T. & Omar, D.-K. (2013). IT Project Management in non-projectized organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, pp. 318-327. | |
dc.relation | Hubbard, D. G. & Bolles, D. L. (2015). PMOs of Today and Tomorrow. Paper; 9th Annual University of Texas at Dallas, Project Management Symposium Proceedings; Dallas, Texas. | |
dc.relation | Hurt, M., & Thomas, J. (2009). Building value through sustainable project management offices. Project Mana-gement Journal, 40(1), pp. 55-72. | |
dc.relation | More, E. & McGrath, M. (1996). Cooperative corporate strategies in Australia’s telecommunications sector, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Canberra. | |
dc.relation | Oliveira, Catarina S. & Tereso, Anabela & Fernandes, Gabriela. (2017). PMO Conceptualization for Engineering and Construction Businesses. Procedia Computer Science. 121. 592-599. | |
dc.relation | Pellegrinelli, S. & Garagna, L. (2009). Towards a conceptualisation of PMOs as agents and subjects of change and renewal. International Journal of Project Management, 27, pp. 649-656. | |
dc.relation | Pemsel, S. & Wiewiora, A. (2013). Project management office a knowledge broker in project-based organisa-tions. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), pp. 31-42. | |
dc.relation | PMI ́s Pulse of the Profession. (2014). The high cost of low performance.Project Management Institute. | |
dc.relation | PMI ́s Pulse of the Profession. (2016). El alto costo de un bajo desempeño.Project Management Institute. | |
dc.relation | PMI ́s Pulse of the Profession. (2017). Aumento de las tasas de éxito.Project Management Institute. | |
dc.relation | PMI ́s Pulse of the Profession. (2018). Success in Disruptive Times | Expanding the Value Delivery Landscape to Address the High Cost of Low Performance. Proyect Management Institute. | |
dc.relation | PMI’s Pulse of the Profession. (2013). PMO: Marcos de Trabajo. PMI’s Pulse of the Profession. | |
dc.relation | Project Management Institute. (2013). Guía de los fundamentos para la dirección de proyectos. Guía del PMBOK®. Quinta edición. | |
dc.relation | Project Management Institute. (2017). Guía de los fundamentos para la dirección de proyectos. Guía del PMBOK®. Sexta edición. | |
dc.relation | Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: aconceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32, pp. 1382-1394. | |
dc.relation | Tahri, H. & Drissi-Kaitouni, O. (2015). New design for calculating Project Management Maturity (PMM). 3rd International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management. Procedia - Social and Be-havioral Sciences, 181( 2015 ), pp. 171 – 177. | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) | |
dc.rights | Derechos Reservados - Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito | |
dc.source | Revista Investigación en Desarrollo y Gerencia Integral de Proyectos (IDGIP); Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2018); p. 28-52 | |
dc.source | 2619-1830 | |
dc.subject | Gestión de Proyectos | |
dc.subject | Gerencia de proyectos | |
dc.subject | Base de Datos | |
dc.subject | Empresas | |
dc.title | Contribución de las PMO a la gerencia de proyectos en las organizaciones: referentes teóricos y aplicaciones | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |