dc.creatorAnctil Avoine, Priscyll
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11 15:26:57
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T13:47:57Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11 15:26:57
dc.date.available2022-09-08T13:47:57Z
dc.date.created2017-12-11 15:26:57
dc.date.created2022-09-08T13:47:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-11
dc.identifier10.18601/16577558.n26.07
dc.identifier2346-2132
dc.identifier1657-7558
dc.identifierhttps://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8448
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n26.07
dc.description.abstractL’engagement des États-Unis en sol afghan découle des prétentions de ce pays à réaffirmer sa puissance hégémonique; cependant, les raisons du maintien des troupes de l’otan, plus de quinze ans après l’invasion sont beaucoup moins évidentes. Les États-Unis n’ont effectivement pas réussi à éliminer, ni même diminuer, les actions des insurgés et le panorama politique s’est complexifié. L’objectif de cet article est donc d’analyser l’occupation afghan par les troupes l’otan à la lumière des postulats et concepts avancés par les réalistes structurels afin de faire une critique de la persistance de l’intervention militaire et de ses effets néfastes sur l’intérêt national des États-Unis. Pour répondre à l’objectif, j’analyse l’engagement des troupes en Afghanistan à la suite des attentats du 11 septembre 2001 et je critique de leur permanence dans ce pays à partir des postulats théoriques de Mearsheimer soutenant l’irrationalité de la poursuite de l’intervention militaire.
dc.description.abstractThe military occupation of Afghanistan by the United States arises from the needs to reassert its hegemonic power. However, the reasons behind the engagement of nato troops in the country 15 years later are much less evident. In fact, it was not possible to eliminate or reduce the actions of insurgencies and the political situation became more complex. Therefore, the objective of this article is to analyze the Afghan occupation by nato in the light of the concepts proposed by structural realism in order to criticize the persistence of military strategy and its detrimental effects on United States’ national interests. To fulfill this objective, I analyze the military invasion of Afghanistan after the attacks of September 11, 2001 and I finally criticize the presence of foreign troops in this country based on the theoretical postulates of Mearsheimer, who argues on the irrationality of pursuing the armed intervention.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherFacultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/5189/6256
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/5189/6315
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/5189/9050
dc.relationNúm. 26 , Año 2017 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation121
dc.relation26
dc.relation107
dc.relationOasis
dc.relationAhmad, L. (2013). Sexual Violence in War and Post-war Afghanistan [mémoire de maîtrise]. Castellon: Jaume I University.
dc.relationAnctil, P. (2015). Cuerpos femeninos en Afganistán: territorios de inseguridades y resistencia. Revista Corpo-grafías: Estudios críticos de y desde los cuerpos. 2 (2), 14-28.
dc.relationBatistella, D. (2009). Théories des relations internationals (3e édition mise à jour et augmentée). Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
dc.relationBush, G. W. (2001). Text of George Bush’s speech. The Guardian.
dc.relationChaudet, D. (2016). Quelle grande puissance pourrait amener la paix en Afghanistan? Le Huffington Post.
dc.relationCordesman, A. H. (2016). The Afghan War: Reshaping American Strategy and Finding Ways to Win. Centre for Strategic & International Studies.
dc.relationECP (2015). Barómetro 39 sobre conflictos y construcción de paz. Escola de Cultura de Pau.
dc.relationGannon, K. (2005). I is for infidel. From Holy war to Holy terror: 18 years inside Afghanistan. New York, United States: Public Affairs.
dc.relationGilpin, R. (1996). No one loves a political realist. Security Studies, 5 (3), 3-26.
dc.relationGul, A. (2016). Taliban: Peace Talks Not Possible Until Foreign ‘Occupation’ of Afghanistan Ends. Voa News.
dc.relationHRW (2015). ‘Today We Shall All Die’: Afghanistan’s Strongmen and the Legacy of Impunity. United States: Human Rights Watch.
dc.relationJackson Jr., W. E. (2010). D-Day for the U.S. in Afghanistan: Realism vs. Idealism. The Huffington Post.
dc.relationJones, S. G. (2009). Playing Russian Roulette In Afghanistan. Fox News.
dc.relationJones, S. G. (2010). In the Graveyard of Empires: America’s War in Afghanistan, New York: Norton & Company.
dc.relationKennedy, P. (1988). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. London, Royaume-Uni : Unwin Hayman.
dc.relationMacleod, A. (2010a). Le réalisme classique. Dans O’Meara, D. et Macleod, A. (eds.), Théories des relations internationales : Contestations et résistances (pp. 68-85). Québec: Athéna Éditions
dc.relationMacleod, A. (2010b). Le réalisme néoclassique. Dans O’Meara, D. et Macleod, A. (eds.), Théories des relations internationales : Contestations et résistances (pp. 115-130). Québec: Athéna Éditions.
dc.relationMadrid Chiriquá, M. (2012). Claves para comprender el conflicto afgano. Panamá América.
dc.relationMashal, M. (2016). How peace between Afghanistan and the Taliban foundered. The New York Times
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (2015). We asked John Mearsheimer: What should be the purpose of American Power? The National Interest.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (2011). Imperial by Design. The National Interest, 111, 16-34.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (2009). How Afghanistan went from good war to bad. Newsweek.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (2006). Structural Realism. Dans Dunne, T., Kurki, M., et Smith, S. (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 71-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (2001). Guns won’t win the afghan war. The New York Times.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. (1994/95). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19 (3), 5-49.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. et Walt, S. M. (2016).The case for offshore balancing a superior U.S. grand strategy, Foreign Affairs, July-August, 70-83.
dc.relationMearsheimer, J. J. et Walt, S. M. (2009). An unnecessary war. Foreign Policy.
dc.relationMorgenthau, H. J. (1969). A new foreign policy for the United States. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
dc.relationNewland, S. J. et Johnson, D. V. (2007). The military and operational significance of the Weinberger Doctrine. Small wars & insurgencies, 1 (2). 171-190.
dc.relationObama, B. (2016). Statement by the President on Afghanistan. The White House.
dc.relationObama, B. (2009). Remarks by the President on a new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan. The White House.
dc.relationParis-Lopez, L. (2015). Open letter To President Obama: End the war in Afghanistan. The Raven Review.
dc.relationRunion, M. L. (2007). The history of Afghanistan. Westport: Greenwood.
dc.relationSchougen, P. (2012). Theory Talk #49: John Mearsheimer on power as the currency of international relations, disciplining US foreign policy, and being an independent variable. Theory Talks.
dc.relationSmith, B. (2009a). Realists warn on Afghan war. Politico.
dc.relationSmith, B. (2009b). Conservatives back Obama on Afghanistan. Politico.
dc.relationTripathi, D. (2014). Critical overview of nato’s role in Afghanistan. nato International School of Azerbaijan policy papers.
dc.relationWalt, S. M. (2001/02). Beyond Bin Laden: Reshaping U.S. foreign policy. International Security, 26 (3), 56-78.
dc.relationWatson Institute for International and Public Affairs (2016). Afghan civilians.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/5189
dc.subjectAfghanistan
dc.subjectwar
dc.subjectstructural realism
dc.subjectnational interest
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectAfghanistan
dc.subjectguerre
dc.subjectréalisme structurel
dc.subjectintérêt national
dc.subjectÉtats-Unis
dc.titleL’impasse de la guerre afghane : Une perspective du réalisme structurel
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución