dc.creatorPérez Salazar, Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T21:17:50Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-09-09T21:17:50Z
dc.date.created2018-12-03 00:00:00
dc.date.created2022-09-09T21:17:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-03
dc.identifier10.18601/01245996.v21n40.06
dc.identifier2346-2450
dc.identifier0124-5996
dc.identifierhttps://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12205
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v21n40.06
dc.description.abstract¿Hasta qué punto debe llegar la libertad individual? John Stuart Mill, defensor de este valor, sostuvo que no se podía ser libre para no ser libre y postuló como caso extremo el ejemplo de alguien que se vende voluntariamente como esclavo. Ese ejemplo ha generado un vivo debate sobre la consistencia de sus posiciones. Este artículo reseña ese debate y procura precisar los puntos de vista de Mill desde varias líneas convergentes: el paternalismo, la esclavitud, los derechos de propiedad y la intervención del Estado en la economía, y el matrimonio y la igualdad de género.
dc.description.abstractWhat are the limits of individual freedom? John Stuart Mill, who was an ardent advocate of liberty as a fundamental value, held that one could not freely choose to be unfree, and posited the extreme example of a person who willingly sells himself as a slave. His example has generated a debate about the consistency of Mill’s positions. This article reviews this debate and tries to clarify his point of view using several convergent lines of argument: paternalism, slavery, the definition of property rights and public intervention of the state in markets, and marriage and gender equality.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Externado de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5734/7126
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5734/7548
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5734/7719
dc.relationNúm. 40 , Año 2019 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation183
dc.relation40
dc.relation163
dc.relation21
dc.relationRevista de Economía Institucional
dc.relation<p>Archard, D. (1990). Freedom not to be free: The case of the slavery contract in J.S. Mill’s <em>On liberty</em>. <em>Philosophical Quarterly</em>, <em>40</em>(161), 453-465.</p> <p>Arneson, R. J. (1980). Mill versus paternalism. <em>Ethics</em>, <em>90</em>(4), 470-489.</p> <p>Arneson, R. J. (1997). Paternalism, utility and fairness. En G. Dworkin, ed., <em>Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays</em> (pp. 83-114). Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</p> <p>Cooter, R. y Ulen, T. (2002). <em>Derecho y economía</em>. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.</p> <p>Dworkin, G. (1997). Paternalism. En G. Dworkin, ed. <em>Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays </em>(pp. 61-82). Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</p> <p>Dworkin, G. (2017). Paternalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/].</p> <p>Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal paternalism. <em>Canadian Journal of Philosophy</em>, <em>1</em>(1), 105-124.</p> <p>Frederick, D. (2014). Voluntary slavery. <em>Las Torres de Lucca</em>, 4, 115-137.</p> <p>Fuchs, A.G. (2001). Autonomy, slavery and Mill’s critique of paternalism. <em>Ethical Theory and Moral Practice</em>, <em>4</em>(3), 231-251.</p> <p>Hamburger, J. (1999). <em>Mill on liberty and control</em>. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</p> <p>Hare, R. M. (1979). What is wrong with slavery. <em>Philosophy and Public Affairs</em>, <em>8</em>(2), 103-121.</p> <p>Hayek, F. A. (1951). <em>John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their friendship and subsequent marriage</em>. London: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul.</p> <p>Knight, F. (1921). <em>Risk, uncertainty and profit</em>. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.</p> <p>Mill, H. T. (1852). Enfranchisement of women. En John M. Robson (ed.), <em>The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill</em>, XXI (pp. 393-416) .Toronto: University of Toronto Press.</p> <p>Mill, J. S. (1832). Essay on marriage and divorce. En F. A. Hayek, <em>John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their friendship and subsequent marriage</em>. Londres: Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul.</p> <p>Mill, J. S. (1850). The negro question. <em>Littell’s Living Age version</em>, 465-469.</p> <p>Mill, J. S. (1869). <em>The subjection of women</em>. Nueva York: D. Appleton and Company.</p> <p>Mill, J. S. (varios). Las demás referencias citadas en el texto provienen de John M. Robson, ed. (1963-1991). <em>The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill</em>. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.</p> <p>Moloney, P. (2011). John Stuart Mill on savagery, slavery and civilization, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1976870].</p> <p>Offen, K. (2001).How (and why) the analogy of marriage with slavery provided the springboard for women’s rights demands in France. <em>Proceedings of the Third Gilman Lehrman Center International Conference at Yale University </em>(pp. 1-16). New Haven: Yale University.</p> <p>Pérez S., M. (2003). <em>La razón liberal: economía, política y ética en la obra de John Stuart Mill</em>. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.</p> <p>Scheidel, W. (2007). The Roman slave supply. Princeton: Stanford working papers in classics.</p> <p>Shanley, M. L. (1981). Marital slavery and friendship: John Stuart Mill’s <em>The subjection of women.</em> <em>Political Theory</em>, <em>9</em>(2), 229-247.</p> <p>Sen, A. (1999). <em>Development as freedom</em>. Nueva York: Knopf.</p> <p>Stephen, J. F. (1997). The doctrine of liberty in its application to morals. En G. Dworkin, ed., <em>Mill’s On liberty: Critical essays</em> (167-178). Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.</p> <p>Ten, C. L. (1980). <em>Mill on liberty</em>, Oxford, Clarendon Press.</p>
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsMauricio Pérez Salazar - 2018
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5734
dc.subjectJohn Stuart Mill, liberty, paternalism, slavery, property rights, marriage, gender equality
dc.subjectJohn Stuart Mill, libertad, paternalismo, esclavitud, derechos de propiedad, matrimonio, igualdad de género
dc.subjectJohn Stuart Mill, liberdade, paternalismo, escravidão, direitos de propriedade, casamento, igualdade de gênero
dc.titlePaternalismo, esclavitud, derechos de propiedad y matrimonio en John Stuart Mill
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución