dc.creatorArango-Lozano, Obed Julián
dc.creatorCastaño-Osorio, Esteban
dc.creatorPeña-Vergara, Camila
dc.creatorLopez-Florez, David
dc.creatorSánchez-Bellaiza, Diana
dc.creatorGuerrero-Peláez, Sebastian
dc.creatorPatiño-Siro, Dahian
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T17:16:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T12:22:41Z
dc.date.available2021-09-02 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-07-01T17:16:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T12:22:41Z
dc.date.created2021-09-02 00:00:00
dc.date.created2022-07-01T17:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-02
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unisucre.edu.co/handle/001/1642
dc.identifier10.24188/recia.v13.n2.2021.865
dc.identifier2027-4297
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v13.n2.2021.865
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3750207
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Sucre
dc.relationStattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Birdlife International; 1998.
dc.relationMyers N, Miterrmeier RA, Mittermier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403:853–858. https://www.nature.com/articles/35002501
dc.relationOrme CD, Davies RG, Burgess M, Eigenbrod F, Pickup N, Olson VA, et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature. 2005; 436:1016–1019. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03850
dc.relationFranco P, Saavedra-Rodriguez CA, Kattan GH. Bird species diversity captured by protected areas in the Andes of Colombia: a gap analysis. Oryx. 2007; 41(1):57-63. https://global.wcs.org/Resources/Publications/Publications-Search-II/ctl/view/mid/13340/pubid/DMX729600000.aspx
dc.relationAvendaño JE, Bohórquez CI, Rosselli L, Arzuza-Buelvas D, Estela FA, Cuervo AM, et al. Lista de chequeo de las aves de Colombia: Una síntesis del estado del conocimiento desde Hilty & Brown (1986). Ornitol. Colomb. 2017; 16:Ea01. https://asociacioncolombianadeornitologia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/16eA0101-83.pdf
dc.relationKattan GH, Franco P, Rojas V, Morales G. Biological diversification in a complex region: a spatial analysis of faunistic diversity and biogeography of the Andes of Colombia. J. Biogeogr. 2004; 31(11):1829-1839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01109.x
dc.relationKattan GH, Franco P. Bird diversity along elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: area and mass effects. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2004; 13(5):451-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00117.x
dc.relationKattan GH, Franco P, Saavedra‐Rodríguez CA, Valderrama C, Rojas V, Osorio D, et al. Spatial components of bird diversity in the Andes of Colombia: implications for designing a regional reserve system. Conserv. Biolo. 2006; 20(4):1203-1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00402.x
dc.relationRenjifo LM. Composition changes in a subAndean avifauna after long-term forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol. 1999; 13(5):1124-1139. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98311.x
dc.relationArmenteras D, Rodríguez N, Retana J, Morales M. Understanding deforestation in montane and lowland forests of the Colombian Andes. Reg. Environ. Change. 2011; 11:693-705. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-010-0200-y
dc.relationSánchez HB, Gallardo SK, Montoya RLA, Rojas MMV, Solano AS, Vargas LD. Carga financiera del cuidado familiar del enfermo crónico en la Región Andina de Colombia. Rev Cienc Salud. 2016; 4(3):339-350. https://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revsalud14.03.2016.03
dc.relationDuarte-Marín S, González-Acosta C, Vargas-Salinas F. Estructura y composición de ensamblajes de anfibios en tres tipos de hábitat en el Parque Nacional Natural Selva de Florencia, Cordillera Central de Colombia. Revista Acad. Colomb Ci Exact. 2018; 42(163):227-236. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.631
dc.relationRangel-Churio OJ. La biodiversidad de Colombia. Ibagué, Colombia: Universidad del Tolima; 2006. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.136
dc.relationDudley N. (Ed.). Directrices para la aplicación de categorías de gestión de áreas protegidas. Gland, Suiza: UICN; 2008.
dc.relationForero-Medina G, Joppa L. Representation of global and national conservation priorities by Colombia’s protected area network. PLoS One. 2010; 5(10):e13210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013210
dc.relationAsociación Calidris. Información actualizada sobre las AICAS reconocidas para el país, con la identificación de la AICAS con potencial para el aviturismo. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; 2017. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11761/34085/17-076PS-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relationArroyabe MA, Gómez L, Marín LA, Restrepo M, et al. Conservación de la avifauna en el AICA La Patasola a través de una estrategia de zonificación y formulación de un plan de manejo. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; 2006 http://repository.humboldt.org.co/handle/20.500.11761/34986
dc.relationArbeláez-Cortés E. Registro fotográfico de algunas especies de la avifauna de la Reserva Natural “La Patasola”, Quindío, Colombia. Boletín SAO. 2007; 1:149-163. https://www.sao.org.co/publicaciones/boletinsao/I2_XVII(2)_2007.pdf
dc.relationJost L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology. 2007; 88:2427-2439. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1736.1
dc.relationJost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos. 2006; 113:363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
dc.relationChao A, Jost L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology. 2012; 93:2533-2547. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1
dc.relationGuzmán D, Ruiz JF, Cadena M. Regionalización de Colombia según la estacionalidad de la precipitación media mensual, a través análisis de componentes principales (ACP). Informe Técnico. Bogotá, Colombia: IDEAM; 2014.
dc.relationFundasilvestre. Conservación de la avifauna en el AICA La Patasola a través de una estrategia de zonificación y formulación de un plan de manejo. Informe técnico. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de investigación en recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt; 2005. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/handle/20.500.11761/34986
dc.relationReynolds RT, Scott JM, Nussbaum RA. A variable circular–plot method for estimating bird numbers. The Cóndor. 1980; 82:309–313. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1367399
dc.relationBibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA. Bird Census Techniques. 1st Edition. Londres: Academic Press; 1992. https://www.elsevier.com/books/bird-census-techniques/bibby/978-0-12-095830-6
dc.relationRalph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, De Sante DF, Milá B. Manual de Fauna silvestre de México: uso, manejo y legislación 115 todos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres. Albany, California: General Technical Report, PSW– GTR–159, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1996. https://www.avesdecostarica.org/uploads/7/0/1/0/70104897/manual_de_metodos.pdf
dc.relationHilty SL, Brown WL. A guide to the birds of Colombia. 1st Edition. New Jersey: Princeton Univ, Press, Princeton; 1986.
dc.relationGibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature. 2011; 478(7369):378-381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425
dc.relationGonzález-Salazar C, Martínez-Meyer E, López-Santiago G. A hierarchical classification of trophic guilds for North American birds and mammals. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2014; 85(3):931-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.7550/rmb.38023
dc.relationRemsen JV, Jr JI, Areta E, Bonaccorso S, Claramunt A, Jaramillo JF, et al. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithological Society. 2020. [accessed September 2020]. Available in: http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm
dc.relationRoot RB. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue‐gray gnatcatcher. Ecological monographs. 1967; 37(4):317-350. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/1942327
dc.relationHolmes RT, Recher HF. Determinants of guild structure in forest bird communities: an intercontinental comparison. The Condor. 1986; 88(4):427-439. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v088n04/p0427-p0439.pdf
dc.relationKissling WD, Sekercioglu CH, Jetz W. Bird dietary guild richness across latitudes, environments and biogeographic regions. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2012; 21(3):328-340.
dc.relationCorder GW, Foreman DI. Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118165881
dc.relationR Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Vienna, Austria. Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020 [accessed May 2020]. Available in: http://www.R-roject.org/
dc.relationHsieh T, Ma K, Chao A. iNEXT online: interpolation and extrapolation. Version 1.3.0. 2013 [accessed May 2020]. Available in: http://glimmer.rstudio.com/tchsieh/inext/
dc.relationJost L, González-Oreja JA. Midiendo la diversidad biológica: más allá del índice de Shannon. Acta Zoológica Lilloana. 2012; 56:3-14. http://www.lillo.org.ar/revis/zoo/2012/v56n1_2/v56n1_2a01.pdf
dc.relationChao A, Shen TJ. Nonparametric estimation of Shannon’s index of diversity when there are unseen species in sample. Environmental and ecological statistics. 2003; 10(4):429-443. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/paper/2003_EEST_10_P429.pdf
dc.relationMagurran A. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ldt. Blackwell Publishing Company; 2004. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Measuring+Biological+Diversity-p-9780632056330
dc.relationChao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Let. 2005; 8(2):148-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00707.x
dc.relationChao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ. Abundance‐based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples. Biometrics. 2006; 62(2):361-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00489.x
dc.relationColwell RK, Elsensohn JE. EstimateS turns 20: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, with non‐parametric extrapolation. Ecography, 2014; 37(6):609-613.
dc.relationBaselga A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2010; 19(1):134-143. http://webspersoais.usc.es/export9/sites/persoais/persoais/andres.baselga/pdfs/Baselga2010a.pdf
dc.relationKoleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ. Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. J Anim Ecol. 2003; 72(3):367-382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x
dc.relationMcKnight MW, White PS, McDonald RI, Lamoreux JF, Sechrest W, Ridgely RS, et al. Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(10):e272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050272
dc.relationMouillot D, De Bortoli J, Leprieur F, Parravicini V, Kulbicki M, Bellwood DR. The challenge of delineating biogeographical regions: nestedness matters for Indo‐Pacific coral reef fishes. J Biogeogr. 2013; 40(12):2228-2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12194
dc.relationSi X, Baselga A, Ding P. Revealing beta-diversity patterns of breeding bird and lizard communities on inundated land-bridge islands by separating the turnover and nestedness components. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0127692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127692
dc.relationIUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2017-3. 2017. [accessed May 2018]. Available in: http://www.iucnredlist.org
dc.relationRosenzweig ML. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623387
dc.relationRenjifo LM, Franco-Maya AM, Amaya-Espinel JD, et al. Libro rojo de aves de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt y Ministerio del Medio Ambiente; 2002.
dc.relationLevey DJ. Spatial and temporal variation in Costa Rican fruit and fruit‐eating bird abundance. Ecol Monogr. 1998; 58(4):251-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942539
dc.relationOcampo-Peñuela N, Etter A. Contribution of different forest types to the bird community of a savanna landscape in Colombia. Ornitol. Neotrop. 2013; 24:35-53. https://sora.unm.edu/node/133350
dc.relationSalas-Correa Á, Mancera-Rodríguez N. Relaciones entre la diversidad de aves y la estructura de vegetación en cuatro etapas sucesionales de bosque secundario, Antioquia, Colombia. Rev. U.D.C.A Ac. & Div Cient. 2018; 21(2):519-529. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v21.n2.2018.970.
dc.relationRuxton GD, Houston DC. Obligate vertebrate scavengers must be large soaring fliers. J. Theor. Biol. 2004; 228(3):431-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.02.005
dc.relationSelva N, Jędrzejewska B, Jędrzejewski W, Wajrak A. Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland. Can J Zool. 2005; 83(12):1590-1601. https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-158
dc.relationCortés-Avizanda A, Jovani R, Carrete M, Donázar JA, Grimm V. Bird sky networks: How do avian scavengers use social information to find carrion? Ecology. 2014; 95:1799-1808. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0574.1
dc.relationArrondo E, Morales-Reyes Z, Moleón M, Cortés-Avizanda A, Donázar JA, Sánchez-Zapata J.A. Rewilding traditional grazing areas affects scavenger assemblages and carcass consumption patterns. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 2019; 41:56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2019.10.006
dc.relationTerborgh J. Bird species diversity on an Andean elevational gradient. Ecology. 1997; 58(5):1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936921
dc.relationSandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape Urban Plan. 2006; 77(1-2):39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004
dc.relationWatson JE, Whittaker RJ, Dawson TP. Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern Madagascar. Biol Conserv. 2004; 120(3):311-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.004
dc.relationLomolino MV, Brown JH, Sax DF. Island biogeography theory. Reticulations and reintegration of “A biogeography of the species”. In: Losos J, Ricklefs, RE, editors. The Theory of Island Biogeography Revisited. Princetion, NJ: Princetion University Press; 2010.
dc.relationDennis, RL, Dapporto L, Sparks TH, Williams SR, Greatorex‐Davies JN, Asher J, Roy DB. Turnover and trends in butterfly communities on two British tidal islands: stochastic influences and deterministic factors. J Biogeogr. 2010; 37(12):2291-2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02380.x
dc.relation
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/865/974
dc.relationNúm. 2 , Año 2021 : RECIA 13(2):JULIO-DICIEMBRE 2021
dc.relatione865
dc.relation2
dc.relatione865
dc.relation13
dc.relationRevista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsObed Julián Arango Lozano, Esteban Castaño-Osorio, Castaño-Osorio E, Camila Peña-Vergara, David Lopez-Florez, Diana Sánchez-Bellaiza, Sebastian Guerrero-Peláez, Dahian Patiño-Siro - 2021
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/865
dc.subjectBeta diversity
dc.subjectBird assemblages
dc.subjectCentral Andes of Colombia
dc.subjectIBA
dc.subjectAICA
dc.subjectAndes Centrales de Colombia
dc.subjectDiversidad beta
dc.subjectEnsamblaje de aves
dc.titleEstructura y composición del ensamblaje de aves en el sitio AICA Reserva Natural La Patasola, Andes Centrales de Colombia
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeJournal article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución