Variabilidad de la precipitacion afecta la composición química, producción de gas y degradabilidad de los cactus

dc.creatorRibeiro Menezes, Daniel
dc.creatorMuniz dos Santos, Juliana
dc.creatorNunes de Oliveira, Cintia Raquel
dc.creatorRodrigues Marcelino, Polyana Deyse
dc.creatorda Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Anna Paula
dc.creatorQueiroz de Carvalho, Dalinne Tamara
dc.creatorSilva Nascimento, Júlio Cesar
dc.creatorGois, Glayciane
dc.creatorVinhas Voltolini, Tadeu
dc.creatorÁvila Queiroz, Mário Adriano
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-14 06:14:52
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T17:16:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T12:20:43Z
dc.date.available2022-05-14 06:14:52
dc.date.available2022-07-01T17:16:22Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T12:20:43Z
dc.date.created2022-05-14 06:14:52
dc.date.created2022-07-01T17:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-14
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unisucre.edu.co/handle/001/1650
dc.identifier10.24188/recia.v14.n1.2022.895
dc.identifier2027-4297
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v14.n1.2022.895
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3749413
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Sucre
dc.relationSalimon C, Anderson L. How strong is the relationship between rainfall variability and Caatinga productivity? A case study under a changing climate. An Acad Bras Ci. 2019; 90:2121–2127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170143.
dc.relationMagalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Gois GC, Campos FS, Souza JSR, Andrade AP, et al. Chemical and mineral composition, kinetics of degradation and in vitro gas production of native cactus. J Agric Stud. 2019; 7:119–137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v7i4.
dc.relationEdvan RL, Mota RRM, Dias-Silva TP, Nascimento RR, Sousa SV, Silva AL, et al. Resilience of cactus pear genotypes in a tropical semi-arid region subject to climatic cultivation restriction. Scient Rep. 2020; 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66972-0.
dc.relationCarvalho CBM, Edvan RL, Carvalho MLAM, Reis ALA, Nascimento RR. Uso de cactáceas na alimentação animal e seu armazenamento após colheita. Arch Zootec. 2018; 67:440-446. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v67i259.3803.
dc.relationBarbosa HA, Kumar TVL, Paredes F, Elliott S, Ayuga JG. Assessment of Caatinga response to drought using Meteosat-SEVIRI normalized difference vegetation index (2008–2016). ISPRS J Phot Rem Sen. 2019; 148:235-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.12.014.
dc.relationSantos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, et al. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5th ed. Brasília, DF: Embrapa; 2018.
dc.relationAoac. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 20th ed. Washington, DC: Latimer Jr., G.W; 2016.
dc.relationVan Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
dc.relationMenezes DR, Costa RG, Araújo GGL, Pereira LGR, Nunes ACB, Henrique LT, et al. Cinética ruminal de dietas contendo farelo de mamona destoxificado. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2015; 67:636-641. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7040.
dc.relationSchofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci. 1994; 72:2980–2991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x.
dc.relationTilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Brit Grass Soc. 1963; 18:104–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x.
dc.relationØrskov ER, Mcdonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 1979; 92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048.
dc.relationAlves FAL, Andrade AP, Bruno RLA, Silva MGV, Souza MFV, Santos DC. Seasonal variability of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in prickly pear cladodes of Opuntia and Nopalea genes. Food Sci Techn. 2017; 37:536-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.19316.
dc.relation14 Davis SC, Simpson J, Gil-Veja KC, Niechayev NA, van Tongerlo E, Castano NH, et al. Undervalued potential of crassulacean acid metabolism for current and future agricultural production. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70:6521–6537. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz223.
dc.relationMatias AGS, Araújo GGL, Campos FS, Moraes SA, Gois, GC, Silva TS, et al. Fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba for goat feeding. J Agric Sci. 2020; 158:304-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000581.
dc.relationGouws CA, Georgousopoulou EN, Mellor DD, McKune A, Naumovski N. Effects of the consumption of prickly pear cacti (Opuntia spp.) and its products on blood glucose levels and insulin: A systematic review. Med. 2019; 55:1-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050138.
dc.relationPereira DS, Lana RP, Carmo DL, Costa YKS. Chemical composition and fermentative losses of mixed sugarcane and pigeon pea silage. Acta Scient. Anim Sci. 2019; 41:e43709. https://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.43709.
dc.relationHristov AN, Bannink A, Crompton LA, Huhtanen P, Kreuzer M, McGee M, et al. Invited review: Nitrogen in ruminant nutrition: A review of measurement techniques. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102:5811–5852. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15829.
dc.relationAlbuquerque AS, Freire FJ, Barbosa MD, Marangon LC, Feliciano ALP. Efficiency of biological utilization of micronutrients by forests species in hypoxerophytic Caatinga. Flor Amb. 2018; 25:e20170925. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.092517.
dc.relationCarvalho CBM, Edvan RL, Nascimento KS, Nascimento RR, Bezerra LR, Jácome DLS, et al. Methods of storing cactus pear genotypes for animal feeding Afr J Range For Sci. 2020; 37:173-179. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1734084.
dc.relationFurtado RN, Carneiro MSS, Pereira ES, Moreira Filho EC, Magalhães JA, Oliveira SMP. Intake, milk yield, and physiological parameters of lactating cows fed on diets containing different quantities of xique xique (Pilosocereus gounellei). Semina: Ci Agr. 2016; 37:483-494. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p483.
dc.relationCordova-Torres AV, Mendoza-Mendoza JC, Bernal-Santos G, Gasca TG, Kawas J, Costa RG, et al. Nutritional composition, in vitro degradability and gas production of Opuntia ficus indica and four other wild cacti species. Life Sci J. 2015; 12:42–54. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj1202s15.07.
dc.relationVazquez-Mendoza P, Miranda-Romero LA, Aranda-Osorio G, Burgueno-Ferreira JA, Salem AZM. Evaluation of eleven Mexican cultivars of prickly pear cactus trees for possibly utilization as animal fed: In vitro gas production. Agrof Syst. 2017; 91:749–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9947-6.
dc.relationRibeiro IA, Voltolini TV, Simões WL, Ferreira MAJF, Menezes DR, Gois GC. Morphological responses, fruit yield, nutritive value and in vitro gas production of forage watermelon genotypes on semi-arid condition. Biol Rhyt Res. 2019; 50:1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1629218.
dc.relationPinto CS, Magalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Gois GC, Véras RML, Campos FS, et al. Potential alternative feed sources for ruminant feeding from the biodiesel production chain by-products. South Afr J Anim Sci. 2020; 50:69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i1.8.
dc.relationSilva JGM, Silva DS, Pereira WE, Diniz MCNM, Silva GJAM, Medeiros MR. Características morfológicas e produção do xique-xique cultivado em diferentes densidades. Rev Cent. 2011; 2:08–17.
dc.relationPinho RMA, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Carvalho GGP, Silva TC, Macêdo AJS, et al. Does the level of forage neutral detergent fiber affect the ruminal fermentation, digestibility and feeding behavior of goats fed cactus pear? Anim Sci J. 2018; 89:1424-1431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/asj.13043.
dc.relationYansari AT. Ruminal kinetics of nutrients degradation, hydration, and functional specific gravity of three types of beet pulp. Iranian J Appl Anim Sci. 2017; 7:17-26. http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_528790.html
dc.relationAlves FAL, Andrade AP, Bruno RLA, Santos DC. Study of the variability, correlation and importance of chemical and nutritional characteristics in cactus pear (Opuntia and Nopalea). Afr J Agric Res. 2016; 11:2882-2892. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11025
dc.relationDoorenbos J, Martín-Tereso J, Dijkstra J, Van Laar H. Effect of different levels of rapidly degradable carbohydrates calculated by a simple rumen model on performance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:5422-5433. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12278
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/975
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/976
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/977
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2022 : RECIA 14(1):ENERO-JUNIO 2022
dc.relatione895
dc.relation1
dc.relatione895
dc.relation14
dc.relationRevista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsDaniel Ribeiro Menezes, Juliana Muniz dos Santos, Cintia Raquel Nunes de Oliveira, Polyana Deyse Rodrigues Marcelino, Anna Paula da Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Dalinne Tamara Queiroz de Carvalho, Júlio Cesar Silva Nascimento, Glayciane Gois, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini, Mário Adriano Ávila Queiroz - 2022
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/895
dc.subjectCactaceae
dc.subjectcrassulacean acid metabolism
dc.subjectdryland
dc.subjectdry matter
dc.subjectfood shortage
dc.subjectneutral detergent fiber
dc.subjectCactaceae
dc.subjectescasez de alimentos
dc.subjectfibra detergente neutra
dc.subjectmateria seca
dc.subjectmetabolismo del ácido crasuláceo
dc.subjectregiones de tierras secas
dc.titleVariabilidad de la precipitacion afecta la composición química, producción de gas y degradabilidad de los cactus
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeJournal article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución