dc.creatorTrillos J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:33:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T20:10:03Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:33:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T20:10:03Z
dc.date.created2020-03-26T16:33:01Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifierCulture and Psychology; Vol. 13, Núm. 2; pp. 197-202
dc.identifier1354067X
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9132
dc.identifier10.1177/1354067X07076607
dc.identifierUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifierRepositorio UTB
dc.identifier16305639300
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3721454
dc.description.abstractThis commentary is an attempt to provide a complementary vision to analyze the study carried out by Giorgi, Padiglione and Pontecorvo. Based on their data, the authors describe three main categories of home appropriation: predominant, proscriptions and incomplete appropriations, each one with clear definitions and descriptions. However, the authors acknowledge that the nature of the methodology and the duration of the study did not permit a thorough study of how these self-representations are constructed. For this reason, here we provide an alternative analysis of the study using the concepts of semiotic mediation and dialogical self, which could be used to propose future research in the field of meaning construction in the home. Copyright © 2007 SAGE Publications.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.sourcehttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248140694&doi=10.1177%2f1354067X07076607&partnerID=40&md5=d5839d13ccf3cbf563097a534ad1ce13
dc.titleDynamic appropriations of domestic space


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución