Marco de trabajo para el bocetado de interacciones enactivas

dc.creatorRodríguez, Andrés Santiago
dc.creatorGonzález, Pascual
dc.creatorRossi, Gustavo Héctor
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T00:20:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T00:20:17Z
dc.date.created2020-10-27T00:20:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.identifier2539-2115
dc.identifier1657-2831
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/8884
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier10.29375/25392115.2493
dc.description.abstractEn este trabajo se presenta un marco de trabajo para caracterizar el bocetado de interacciones enactivas. Se pasa revista a los conceptos básicos de interfaces enactivas y al rol del bocetado para el diseño de interacciones. Luego se propone un marco de trabajo que organiza el bocetado en un mapa en dos dimensiones. En una se expresa la interactividad que corporizan las diferentes representaciones utilizadas por los diseñadores (bocetos 2D, maquetas y bocetos en hardware). La otra, organiza el rango de expresividad que esas representaciones alcanzan en términos de la experiencia de usuario. Las diferentes categorías de bocetos se vinculan en el marco propuesto mediante los atributos de la interactividad que busca el diseñador. Se presentan dos casos de estudio exploratorios sobre el uso de bocetos para la generación de ideas de interacciones enactivas. Finalmente, se esbozan los requerimientos que surgen para el desarrollo de herramientas que soporten el bocetado de interacciones enactivas.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/2493
dc.relationArvola, M. and Artman, H. 2007. Enactments in Interaction Design: How Designers Make Sketches Behave. Artifact. 1, 2 (2007), 106–119.
dc.relationBach-y-Rita, P. and Kercel, S.W. 2003. Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 12 (2003).
dc.relationBrayda, L. et al. 2013. What you touch is what you get: Self-assessing a minimalist tactile sensory substitution device. IEEE World Haptics Conference 2013. (Apr. 2013), 491–496.
dc.relationBruner, J.S. 1969. Hacia una teoría de la instrucción. UTEHA.
dc.relationBuxton, B. 2007. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.
dc.relationDiefenbach, S. et al. 2013. An Interaction Vocabulary . Describing The How Of Interaction. CHI 2013 (Paris, Apr. 2013), 607.
dc.relationFroese, T. et al. 2012. The Enactive Torch: ANew Tool for the Science of Perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 5, 4 (2012), 365–375.
dc.relationGoldschmidt, G. 1991. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal. 4, 2 (1991), 123–143.
dc.relationHartmann, B. et al. 2006. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. Proceedings of the 19th annualACMsymposiumonUserinterfacesoftwareand technology (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 299–308.
dc.relationHeidegger, M. 2008. Being and time. Harper Perennial Modern Cassics.
dc.relationHolman, D. et al. 2014. Sensing Touch Using Resistive Graphs. DIS 2014 (New York, NY, USA, NY, USA, 2014), 195–198.
dc.relationHornecker, E. 2007. Sketches, Drawings, Diagrams, Physical Models, Prototypes, and Gesture as Representational Forms. Physicality 2007 (2007).
dc.relationHummels, C. et al. 2006. Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 11, 8 (Nov. 2006), 677–690.
dc.relationKirsh, D. 2013. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM TOCHI. 20, 1 (2013), 3:1–3:30.
dc.relationKlemmer, S.R. et al. 2006. How bodies matter. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Designing Interactive systems DIS 06 (2006), 140.
dc.relationKlemmer, S.R. et al. 2008. Integrating Physical and Digital Interactions on Walls for Fluid Design Collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction. 23, 2 (Apr. 2008), 138–213.72Andrés Rodríguez, Pascual González, Gustavo RossiD i s e ñ o
dc.relationKwon, D.Y. 2008. ADesign Framework for 3D Spatial Gesture Interfaces. ETH Zurich.
dc.relationLanday,J.A.1996.SILK:sketchinginterfaceslikekrazy. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 1996), 398–399.
dc.relationLawson,B.2006.Howdesignersthink:thedesignprocess demystified. Elsevier.
dc.relationLeap Motion: http://www.leapmotion.com.
dc.relationLeapTrainer.js: http://github.com/roboleary/LeapTrainer.js.
dc.relationLim, Y. et al. 2009. Interactivity attributes. CHI 2009 (New York, New York, USA, Apr. 2009), 105.
dc.relationLim, Y.-K. et al. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: prototypes as filters,prototypesasmanifestationsofdesignideas.ACM TOCHI. 15, 2 (Jul. 2008), 1–27.
dc.relationLöwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design: ADesign Perspective on Information Technology. MITPress.
dc.relationMazalek, A. et al. 2009. Framing tangible interaction frameworks. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 23, 3 (Jun. 2009), 225–235.
dc.relationMoussette, C. and Dore, F. 2010. Sketching in Hardware and Building Interaction Design : tools , toolkits and an attitude for Interaction Designers. Proceedings of Design Research Society (Montreal, Canada, 2010).
dc.relationNode-isassembleJohnny-Five:https://github.com/rwaldron/ johnny-five.
dc.relationObrenovic, Ž. and Martens, J.-B. 2011. Sketching interactive systems with sketchify. ACM TOCHI. 18, 1 (Apr. 2011), 1–38.
dc.relationPurcell, A.T. and Gero, J.S. 1998. Drawings and the design process. Design Studies. 19, 4 (1998), 389–430.
dc.relationTversky, B. and Suwa, M. 2009. Thinking with Sketches. Tools for innovation. O. Markman, ed. Oxford University Press.
dc.relationVerplank,B.2013.ClosingKeynote:TangibleInteraction Metaphors,HapticsandCelebration.TEI2013(Barcelona, 2013), 94305.
dc.relationWilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9, 4 (2002), 625–636.
dc.relationWoo, J. et al. 2011. Interactivity sketcher. CHI 2011 (New York, New York, USA, May 2011), 1429.
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/2493/2130
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2015 Revista Colombiana de Computación
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Computación; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2015): Revista Colombiana de Computación; 48-74
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subjectCiencia de los computadores
dc.subjectDesarrollo de tecnología
dc.subjectIngeniería de sistemas
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.subjectTecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones
dc.subjectTIC´s
dc.titleMarco de trabajo para el bocetado de interacciones enactivas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución