El fortalecimiento de la participación de las víctimas ante la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz – JEP – en Colombia.

dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2929-3030
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=7QVTNf0AAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001468705
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8085/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000004146
dc.creatorAlfonso Camelo, Heyder
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T16:47:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T15:46:45Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T16:47:47Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T15:46:45Z
dc.date.created2020-01-16T16:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-29
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/20553
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3676499
dc.description.abstractThe Final Agreement, Legislative Act 01 of 2017, the Statutory Law of the Administration of Justice in the JEP (Law 1957 of 2019) and Law 1922 of 2018, indicate as the guiding principle of the JEP that of the “centrality of the victims”. In this restorative justice scenario, it is necessary to describe and analyze the participation of the victims and the organizations that represent them before the JEP, in the course of different scenarios and procedures:  Preparation and presentation of reports;  Participation during the voluntary versions;  Presentation of comments to the voluntary versions;  Intervention during the responsibility acceptance hearing;  Construction of own sanctions; Y  Compliance and monitoring of restorative sanctions. Both the related regulations, as well as the procedures and scenarios for the participation of the victims, are open themes where the tension between fundamental rights - of the defendants, the possible third parties and the victims - will be processed through an alleged restorative justice.
dc.relationApori-Nkansah, Lydia. Transitional Justice in Postconflict Contexts: The Case of Sierra Leone’s Dual Accountability Mechanisms. Walden University: 2008.
dc.relationArmstrong, J. (2014) Rethinking the restorative-retributive dichotomy: is reconciliation possible? Contemporary Justice Review.
dc.relationBoraine, A. (2006). Transitional justice: a holistic interpretation. Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 60, No. 1, Historical Reconciliation, pp. 17-27
dc.relationBronwyn Leebow (2011) Judging State-Sposored Violence, Imaging Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationChapman, Tim. The Problem of Community in a Justice System in Transition: The Case of Community Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland. International Criminal Law Review 12 (2012) 573–587. 2012.
dc.relationChega Report of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation. Timor-Leste. Executive Summary.
dc.relationCinco conclusiones desarrolladas en Gibson, James L. The Truth about Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. International Political Science Review / Revue international de science politique. Sage Publications, Ltd.
dc.relationClark, Phil. The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: justice without lawyers.
dc.relationComisión Internacional de Juristas (CIJ) Colombia: Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, análisis a un año y medio de su entrada en funcionamiento (junio 2019). El reporte fue escrito por Rocío Quintero M, asesora legal para el programa de América Latina de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas bajo la dirección y supervisión de los comisionados Robert Goldman, Carlos Ayala, Wilder Tayler y Philippe Texier. El reporte se benefició de los insumos elaborados por Federico Andreu- Guzmán, antiguo representante para Suramérica de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas.
dc.relationDignan, James (2005). Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice (Ed. Maguire, Mike). New York: Open University Press. Ver capítulo Intellectual foundations of the restorative justice movement.
dc.relationDukalskis, Alexander. Interactions in Transition: How Truth Commissions and Trials Complement or Constrain Each Other. International Studies Review, Vol. 13, No. 3 (September 2011), pp. 432-451.
dc.relationElster, J. (2004). Closing the books. Transitional justice in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationFlick, U. (2015). El Diseño de Investigación Cualitativa. Morata.
dc.relationGibson, James L.Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 603, Law, Society, and Democracy: Comparative Perspectives (Jan., 2006), pp. 82-110. Sage Publications, Inc. in association with the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
dc.relationHayner, P (2001). Unspeakable Truths. Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.relationHayner, Priscilla B. Comisiones de la verdad: resumen esquemático. International Review of the Red Cross.
dc.relationHuman Rights Watch. Justice Compromised. The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts
dc.relationJustice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. Mediante este Acto se establecieron mecanismos que permiten negociar las sanciones de aquellos que hubieran cometido una violación, siempre y cuando las partes del proceso así lo acepten.
dc.relationKatzenstein, S. (2003) ‘Hybrid tribunals: searching for justice in East Timor’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, p 256.
dc.relationLeebaw, Bronwyn. Legitimation or Judgment? South Africa's Restorative Approach to Transitional Justice. Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Northeastern Political Science Association.
dc.relationLeonard, Liam y Kenny, Paula. The restorative justice movement in Ireland.
dc.relationMutua, M (2001). ‘Savages, victims and saviors: the metaphor of human rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 42, pp 201 – 242.
dc.relationMuwereza, Nathan (2013). Retributive Vs Restorative Justice in the Northern Uganda Conflict. A case for selective justice; the application of different forms of criminal justice.
dc.relationNaciones Unidas. Consejo de Seguridad. Informe del Secretario General. El Estado de derecho y la justicia de transición en las sociedades que sufren o han sufrido conflictos. Agosto 3 de 2004.
dc.relationOlsen, T. Payne, L. Reiter, A. (2010) Transitional Justice in Balance. Comparing processes, weight efficacy. United States Institute of Peace Press. Washington, D.C.
dc.relationPrimer Informe del Relator Especial sobre la promoción de la verdad, la justicia, la reparación y las garantías de no repetición, Pablo de Greiff, A/HRC/21/46, 9 de agosto de 2012.
dc.relationPrograma de divulgación sobre el genocidio en Ruanda y las Naciones Unidas. Disponible en URL: http://www.un.org/es/preventgenocide/rwanda/index.shtml.
dc.relationPromotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995. Chapter 2. Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
dc.relationRegulation 2001/10 on the Establishment of a Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor. Section 3. Objectives and Functions of the Commission.
dc.relationSánchez León, Nelson Camilo y Parra Vera, Oscar. Justicia Restaurativa en los procedimientos de la Justicia Especial para la Paz. Sánchez León 2017.
dc.relationStatute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Art. 1. Competence of the Special Court. “Memory Frictions: Localizing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone”, International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007): 183-207. En: Nesiah, Vasuki. Los Juicios sobre la Historia: Perder la Justicia en lo Monstruoso y lo Banal. Perspectivas jurídicas para la paz. Helena Alviar García, Isabel Cristina Jaramillo Sierra. Universidad de los Andes.
dc.relationSweeney, J. (2012). Restorative justice and transitional justice at the ECHR. International Criminal Law Review
dc.relationTeitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford. University Press, Inc.
dc.relationThomas, D. y Gardner, R. (2014). Restorative Justice in Post-Conflict Northern Uganda: Exploring Reconciliation and Reconstruction through Transitional Justice Mechanisms.
dc.relationUprimny, Rodrigo; Saffon, María Paula (2006). Justicia transicional y justicia restaurativa: tensiones y complementariedades. En Entre El Perdón y el Paredón. Preguntas y dilemas de la justicia transicional (Ed. Rettberg, Angelika). Bogotá: Uniandes.
dc.relationWaldorf, L. (2006). Mass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice. Temple Law review. Vol. 79. No. 1.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleEl fortalecimiento de la participación de las víctimas ante la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz – JEP – en Colombia.
dc.typeApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Documento de trabajo (working papers)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución