Inglés con Propósitos Específicos: Escenarios para el Desarrollo de la Competencia Argumentativa

dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-9222
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=rUi9OoAAAAAJ&hl=en
dc.contributorhttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001615980
dc.contributorhttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000020502
dc.contributorUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.creatorHerreño-Contreras, Yomaira Angélica
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T17:06:48Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T17:06:48Z
dc.date.created2021-08-03T17:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-12
dc.identifierHerreño-Contreras, Y. (2020). Inglés con propósitos específicos: escenario para el desarrollo de la competencia argumentativa. Lenguas Modernas, (55), pp. 89-113. https://revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/58720/62314
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/35225
dc.description.abstractThis article displays a methodological proposal aimed at the development of the argumentative competence in English as a foreign language. It consists of three stages and was implemented in subjects such as English 6, 7, legal English 1 and legal English 2 at the law faculty from Universidad Santo Tomás in Villavicencio (Colombia). It was developed under the framework of the qualitative research approach, and sought to respond to students’ needs in terms of the development of the oral production and the strengthening of Higher Order Thinking Skills, autonomy and self-regulation. Consequently, a legal argumentation cycle was designed and implemented over the course of the three pedagogical stages. It was enriched with various methodological strategies, such as digital storytelling, news storytelling, debate, SMART goals and Bloom’s taxonomy. The instruments to collect data were students’ journals, a speaking rubric and a survey. The results suggest that English for Specific Purposes is a suitable learning scenario for the person’s integral education as a historical subject committed to transforming his context.
dc.relationAkerman, R. y I. Neale. 2011. Debating the evidence: an international review of current situation and perceptions. Londres; RU: The English Speaking Union. Disponible en: http://debate.uvm. edu/dcpdf/ESU_Report_debatingtheevidence_FINAL.pdf.
dc.relationAnderson, L. y D. Krathwohl. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Nueva York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
dc.relationAndrade, H. E Y. DU. 2005. Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10/3:1-11[en línea]. Disponible en: http://pareonline. net/pdf/v10n3.pdf
dc.relationAugustiniene, A. y N. Ciuciulkiene. 2012. Development of argumentation skills in IBT/L context: A complex case study of teacher professional development programme. Kaunas, LU: Kaunas University of Technology. Disponible en: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua › cgi-bin › irbis_nbuv › cgiirbis_64
dc.relationBanville, S. 2005. Creating ESL/EFL lessons based on news and current events. The Internet TESL Journal 11(9). Disponible en: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Banville-News/
dc.relationBarrantes-Montero, L. 2009. A brief view of the ESP approach. Letras 46: 125-143 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/letras/article/view/1661/1576
dc.relationBelcher, D. 2006. English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly 40/1:133-156 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
dc.relationBloom, B., M.engelhart., E. Furst., W.hill y D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. Nueva York, NY: David McKay.
dc.relationBreeze, R. 2015. Teaching the vocabulary of legal documents: a corpus-driven approach. E.S.P Today 3/1: 44-63 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.esptodayjournal.org/pdf/current_ issue/2015/3.%20RUTH%20BREEZE%20-%20full%20text.pdf
dc.relationBurns, A. 2009. Action research in second language teacher education. En A. Burns y J.C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Pp. 289-297. Nueva York, NY: Cambridge.
dc.relationCaverly, D. C., K. Gregory y J. Steelman. 2010. Techtalk: Digital storytelling and developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education 33/2: 42-43.
dc.relationChen, H. 2005.The rationale for critical pedagogy in facilitating cultural identity development. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue 7/1-2:11-22.
dc.relationChen, M. H. 2016. Theoretical framework for integrating higher-order thinking into L2 speaking. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 6/2 :217-226 [en línea]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi. org/10.17507/tpls.0602.01
dc.relationDörnyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow, RU: Longman.
dc.relationDrid, T. 2014. Exploring the use of through-argumentation and counter-argumentation in Arabicspeaking EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Arab World English Journal 5/4: 336-352 [en línea]. Disponible en:https://www.awej.org/index.php/volume-5-2014/53-awej-voulume-5number-4-2014/592-touria-drid
dc.relationDudley-Evans, T. y M.j. St. John.1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: a multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge, RU: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationDunbar, N., C. Brooks. y T. Kubicka-Miller. 2006. Oral communication skills in higher education: using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills. Innovative Higher Education 31/2:115-128 [en línea]. doi: 10.1007/s10755-006-9012-x
dc.relationEscalona, A. y G. Lombardi. 2016. Aprender a argumentar y argumentar para aprender. Trabajo presentado en XIV Jornadas de Investigación Educativa y V Congreso Internacional de Educación, Caracas, Venezuela. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35355.77605
dc.relationFarmer, J.A. 2008. How to effectively use news articles in the EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal 14/12 [en línea]. Disponible en: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Farmer-News.html
dc.relationFreeley, A. y D. Steinberg. 2000. Argumentation and debate: critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Belmont, Canada: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.
dc.relationGarcía-Ferrando, M. 1993. La encuesta. En M. García., J. Ibáñez y F. Alvira, El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación. Pp. 141-170. Madrid, España: Alianza Universidad Textos
dc.relationGarcía-Laborda, J. y M. Litzler. 2015. Current perspectives in teaching English for Specific Purposes. ONOMÁZEIN 31: 38-51 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/287206321_Current_Perspectives_in_Teaching_English_for_Specific_Purposes
dc.relationGonzález, L., Y.A. Herreño-Contreras. y S. Vargas. 2016. Ciclo de argumentación mediante estrategias problematizadoras para promover la competencia argumentativa oral y escrita en un curso de Inglés Legal. Trabajo presentado en Tercer Encuentro de Experiencias Investigativas en torno a la Enseñanza-Aprendizaje de las Lenguas. Actualidad y Proyecciones USTA Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. Disponible en:https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11634/11795 /2017Gonz%C3%A1lezHerre%C3%B1oVargas.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relationHalliday, M.A.K., A. Mcintosh. y P. Strevens. 1964.The linguistic sciences and language teaching, Londres, RU: Longmans.
dc.relationHernández, R., C. Fernández. y M.baptista. 2014. Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill Education
dc.relationHerreño-Contreras, Y.A. y J.A. Huertas-Torres. 2019. Empowering HOTS in EFL settings: a lesson on child prostitution. Humanising Language Teaching 21/3 [en línea].Disponible en: http://hltmag.ng3.devwebsite.co.uk/june19/empowering-hots
dc.relationHerreño-Contreras, Y.A. 2019. From newstelling to news debating: a path to foster EFL argumentation skills. Lenguas en contexto 10: 70-85 [en línea].Disponible en: http://www. facultaddelenguas.com/lencontexto/?idrevista=26#26.70
dc.relationHuang, Y. y M. Gui. 2015. Articulating teachers’ expectations afore: impact of rubrics on Chinese EFL learners’ self-assessment and speaking ability. Journal of Education and Training Studies 3/3: 126-132 [en línea]. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i3.753
dc.relationIman, J.N.2017. Debate instruction in EFL classroom: impacts on the critical thinking and speaking skill. International Journal of Instruction 10/4: 87-108 [en línea]. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ iji.2017.1046a
dc.relationKlimas, A. 2011. Enhancing EFL learners’ motivation by a goal-setting procedure. Anglica Wratislaviensia 49: 171-184.
dc.relationLagos, M.L. (s.f). Enseñanza-aprendizaje de la argumentación en el programa de la escuela primaria (PEP) [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.ibo.org/contentassets/4ccc99665bc04f3686957ee 197c13855/research-jtra-teaching-learning-argumentation-pyp-exec-summary-es.pdf
dc.relationLanger, A. 2002. Reflecting on practice: using learning journals in higher and continuing education. Teaching in Higher Education 7/3: 337-351[en línea]. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1080/13562510220144824
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Subdirección General de Cooperación Internacional. 2002. Marco Común Europeo de Referencia para las Lenguas: Aprendizaje, Enseñanza y Evaluación. Madrid; España: Secretaría General Técnica del MECD-Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones, y Grupo ANAYA, S.A [en línea]. Disponible en: https:// cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/marco/cvc_mer.pdf
dc.relationO’keefe, A., M. Mccarthy. y R. Carter. 2007. From corpus to classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationÖztürk, O. 2019. Personal goal-setting in an EFL writing class. Dil Dergisi Language Journal 170/ 1: 89-107 [en línea]. doi: 10.33690/dilder.528983
dc.relationPark, Ch. 2003. Engaging students in the learning process: the learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 27/2: 183-199 [en línea]. doi: 10.1080/03098260305675
dc.relationPérez-Echeverría, M., Y. Postigo y M. García-Mila. 2016.Argumentation and education: notes for a debate. Infancia y Aprendizaje 39/1: 1-24 [en línea]. doi: 10.1080/02103702.2015.1111607
dc.relationQuintana, R. y R. Correnti. 2019. The right to argue: teaching and assessing everydayargumentation skills. Journal of Further and Higher Education 43/8: 1133-1151[en línea]. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2018.1450967
dc.relationRazmia, M., S. Pouralib. y S. Nozad. 2014. Digital storytelling in EFL classroom (oral presentation of the story: a pathway to improve oral production. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 98: 1541-1544 [en línea]. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.576
dc.relationRubin, J. 2015. Using goal setting and task analysis to enhance task-based language learning and teaching. Trabajo presentado en SCOLT, Decatur, Georgia State University. Disponible en: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080303.pdf
dc.relationRuiz, J.I. 2012. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto.
dc.relationRybold, G. 2006. Speaking, listening and understanding: debate for non-native English. Nueva York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
dc.relationSañudo, L.E. 2006. La ética en la investigación educativa. Hallazgos 3/6: 83-98 [en línea].Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-3841.2006.0006.05
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. 1990. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 25/1: 71-86 [en línea]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
dc.relationToulmin, S. 2003. The uses of argument. Cambridge, RU: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationUniversidad Santo Tomás. 2015. Filosofía y Cultura Institucional. Volumen I. Bogotá: Ediciones USTA.
dc.relationUniversidad Santo Tomás. (diciembre 3, 2014). Políticas de adquisición de lengua extranjera. [Acuerdo 46] [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.usta.edu.co/images/documentos/documentos-institucionales/acuerdos/ acuerdo_46.pdf
dc.relationUniversidad Santo Tomás. 2010. Modelo Pedagógico Educativo. Bogotá: Ediciones USTA.
dc.relationUniversidad Santo Tomás. 2004. Proyecto Educativo Institucional. Bogotá: Ediciones USTA
dc.relationXhaferi, B. 2010. Teaching and learning ESP vocabulary. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 16: 229-255 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/LFE/article/ view/135/123.
dc.relationZare, P. Y M. Othman. 2015. Students’ perceptions toward using classroom debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science 11/9: 158-170 [en línea]. doi:10.5539/ass.v11n9p158
dc.relationŽelježič, M. 2017. Debate in the EFL classroom. ELOPE 14/1: 39-54 [en línea]. doi:10.4312/ elope.14.1.39-54
dc.relationhttps://revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/58720
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleInglés con Propósitos Específicos: Escenarios para el Desarrollo de la Competencia Argumentativa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución