dc.creator | Cepeda-Gomez, Rudy | |
dc.creator | Olgac, Nejat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-17T16:15:01Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T14:39:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-17T16:15:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T14:39:48Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-12-17T16:15:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-03-13 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11634/20411 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2014.886745 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3662886 | |
dc.description.abstract | We consider a linear algorithm to achieve formation control in a group of agents which are driven by second-order dynamics
and affected by two rationally independent delays. One of the delays is in the position and the other in the velocity information
channels. These delays are taken as constant and uniform throughout the system. The communication topology is assumed to
be directed and fixed. The formation is attained by adding a supplementary control term to the stabilising consensus protocol.
In preparation for the formation control logic, we first study the stability of the consensus, using the recent cluster treatment
of characteristic roots (CTCR) paradigm. This effort results in a unique depiction of the non-conservative stability boundaries
in the domain of the delays. However, CTCR requires the knowledge of the potential stability switching loci exhaustively
within this domain. The creation of these loci is done in a new surrogate coordinate system, called the ‘spectral delay space
(SDS)’. The relative stability is also investigated, which has to do with the speed of reaching consensus. This step leads
to a paradoxical control design concept, called the ‘delay scheduling’, which highlights the fact that the group behaviour
may be enhanced by increasing the delays. These steps lead to a control strategy to establish a desired group formation that
guarantees spacing among the agents. Example case studies are presented to validate the underlying analytical derivations. | |
dc.relation | Agaev, R.,&Chebotarev, P. (2005). On the spectra of nonsymmetric Laplacian matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 399, 157–168. | |
dc.relation | Bell, H.E. (1965). Gershgorin’s theorem and zeros of polynomials. American Mathematical Monthly, 74, 292–295. | |
dc.relation | Biggs, N. (1993). Algebraic graph theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation | Cao, Y., Yu, W., Wei, R., & Cheng, G. (2013). An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9, 427–438. | |
dc.relation | Cepeda-Gomez, R., & Olgac, N. (2011a). An exact method for the stability analysis of linear consensus protocols with time delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56, 1734– 1740. | |
dc.relation | Dimarogonas, D.V., & Kyriakopoulos, K.J. (2009). Inverse agreement protocolswith application to distributed multi-agent dispersion. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54, 657– 663. | |
dc.relation | Ergenc, A.F., Olgac, N., & Fazelinia, H. (2007). Extended Kronecker summation for cluster treatment of LTI systems with multiple delays. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 46, 143–155. | |
dc.relation | Fax, A., & Murray, R. (2004). Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49, 1465–1476. | |
dc.relation | Fazelinia, H. (2007). A novel stability analysis of systems with multiple time delays and its applications to high speed milling chatter (PhD dissertation). Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. | |
dc.relation | Gabow, H.N.,&Myers, E.W. (1978). Finding all spanning trees of directed and undirected graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 7, 280–287. | |
dc.relation | Lin, P., & Jia, Y. (2009a). Further results on decentralized coordination in networks of agents with second order dynamics. IET Control Theory and Applications, 3, 957–970. | |
dc.relation | Liu, C.-L., & Tian, Y.-P. (2009). Formation control of multi-agent systems with heterogeneous communication delays. International Journal of Systems Science, 40, 627–636. | |
dc.relation | Marcus, M., & Minc, H. (1996). A survey of matrix theory and matrix inequalities. New York, NY: Dover. | |
dc.relation | Olfati-Saber, R. (2006). Flocking for multi-agent systems: Algorithms and theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 51, 401–420. | |
dc.relation | Pavone, M., & Frazzolli, E. (2007). Decentralized policies for geometric pattern formation and path coverage. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 129, 633– 643. | |
dc.relation | Ren, W. (2007). Consensus strategies for cooperative control of vehicle formations. IET Control Theory and Applications, 1, 505–512. | |
dc.relation | Schaefer,R.D. (1996). An introduction to nonassociative algebras. New York, NY: Dover. | |
dc.relation | Toker, O.,&Ozbay, H. (1996). Complexity issues in robust stability of linear delay-differential systems. Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems, 9, 386–400. | |
dc.relation | Vicsek, T., Czir´ok, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I., & Shochet, O. (1995). Novel type of phase transition in a system of selfdriven particles. Physical Review Letters, 76, 1226–1229. | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia | |
dc.title | Stability of formation control using a consensus protocol under directed communications with two time delays and delay scheduling | |
dc.type | Generación de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicos | |