The Role of Problematizing Tutoring in the Development of EFL Students’ Writing Skills1

dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-9222
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-3273
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=rUi9OoAAAAAJ&hl=en
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001615980
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001346110
dc.creatorHerreño Contreras, Yomaira Angélica
dc.creatorVargas Ayala, Sandra Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T00:51:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T14:36:45Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T00:51:10Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T14:36:45Z
dc.date.created2020-05-19T00:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-18
dc.identifierHerreño, C., Y.A., Vargas, A., S.R. (2019). The Role of Problematizing Tutoring in the Development of EFL Students’ Writing Skills1 Villavicencio: Universidad Santo Tomas
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/23282
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3662103
dc.description.abstractAfter analyzing and reflecting upon the errors students made when facing English writing activities, it was proposed to implement problematizing tutoring sessions as a strategy to assist them in overcoming their hurdles when writing. The participants of the study were 37 third-semester Law students from Universidad Santo Tomás (Villavicencio-Colombia). The main theoretical constructs that supported this research were problematizing tutoring and writing as a process. The study was developed under the framework of the qualitative research approach and implemented under the action research cycle. Hence, the instruments to collect data were the tutor’s journal, students’ artifacts, and a survey. On campus, this conducted research has contributed to inciting more inquiry about students’ writing skills and transforming the habitual tutoring approach as a teaching and counseling process into a problematizing learning scenario. The results suggest that among law students, problematizing tutoring sessions are prone to being conceived as a legal English environment, a creative space, and a problem-solving context.
dc.relationAlrajhi, M. N., & Aldhafri, S. S. (2015). Peer tutoring effects on Omani students’ English self-concept. International Education Studies, 8(6), 184-193. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n6p184Alrajhi, M. N., & Aldhafri, S. S. (2015). Peer tutoring effects on Omani students’ English self-concept. International Education Studies, 8(6), 184-193. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n6p184
dc.relationAl-Jumaily, S. (2015). Improving my students' writing skill: an intensive course for ESL learners by using process-approach to writing with the assistance of computer word processor. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 29-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v2n1p29
dc.relationBelkhir, A., & Benyelles, R. (2017). Identifying EFL learners essay writing difficulties and sources: a move towards solution. The case of second year EFL learners at Tlemcen University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(6),80-88. Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/915/pdf
dc.relationBell, A. (2007). Exploring tutors’ conceptions of excellent tutorial. Teaching and Learning in (Higher) Education for Sessional Staff, 1(1). Retrieved from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/9248/2/tutors%20conceptions%20of%20excellent%20tutoring.pdf
dc.relationBreuing, M. (2011). Problematizing critical pedagogy. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy,3(3), 2-23. Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/view/246/113
dc.relationBritish Council Colombia. (2015). English in Colombia: An examination of policy, perceptions and influencing factors. Bogotá, Colombia: British Council. Retrieved from https://ei.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/latinamericaresearch/ English%20in%20Colombia.pdf
dc.relationBrown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
dc.relationCelis, A.Y. (2012). Understanding the effectiveness of peer tutoring as a process to improve English writing among beginnerlevel EFL students. Opening Writing Doors Journal, 9(1), 209-227. Retrieved from http://ojs.unipamplona.edu.co/ojs_viceinves/index.php/OWD/article/view/273/262
dc.relationChism, D. (2018). Excavating the artifacts of student learning. Educational Leadership, 75(5). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb18/vol75/num05/Excavating-the-Artifacts-of-Student- Learning.aspx
dc.relationCohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, UK: Routledge. Creswell, J., & Maietta, R. C. (2002). Qualitative research. In Miller, D.C & Salkind, N.J (Eds.), Handbook of research design and social measurement (pp. 143-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
dc.relationDickinson, P. (2014). The effect of topic selection control on EFL writing fluency. Journal of Niigata University of International and Information Studies, 17, 15-25.
dc.relationEllis, R. (2010). EPILOGUE: A framework for investigation oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 32(2), 335-349. doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44488131
dc.relationFerris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K & Hyland, F (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationFreire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York; NY: Herder and Herder.
dc.relationHasan, M. K., & Akhand, M. M. (2010). Approaches to writing in EFL/ESL context: Balancing product and process in writing class at tertiary level. Journal of NELTA, 15(1-2), 77-88. Retrieved from https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NELTA/article/view/4612/3823
dc.relationHedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationHedge, T. (2005). Writing (Resource books for teachers). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationHinds, D. (2000). Research instruments. In Wilkinson, D (Ed.), The researcher's toolkit: The complete guide to practitioner research (pp.41-54). London, UK: Routledge.
dc.relationHyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003399
dc.relationKellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 237-242. doi: 10.3758/BF03194058
dc.relationLawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2013). The use of Grounded Theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 11(1), 29-40.
dc.relationMack, L. (2012). Reflective journals in EFL tutoring. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 9(4), 165-189.
dc.relationMadrid, D., & McLaren, N. (1995): Didactic procedures for TEFL. Valladolid, Spain: La Calesa.
dc.relationMarashi, H., & Dadari, L. (2012). The impact of using task-based writing on EFL learners’ writing performance and creativity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 2500-2507. doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.12.2500-2507
dc.relationMcKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
dc.relationMermelstein, A. D. (2015). Improving EFL learners’ writing through enhanced extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 182-198.
dc.relationMyers, S. A. (2004). Reassessing the “proofreading trap”: ESL tutoring and writing instruction. The Writing Center Journal, 24(1), 51-70.
dc.relationNassaji, H. (2011). Correcting student’s written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedback. SSLLT 1(3), 315-334. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.2
dc.relationNieto-Cruz, M. C., Cortés-Cárdenas, L., & Cárdenas-Beltrán, M. L. (2013). La tutoría académica en lenguas extranjeras: Expectativas y realidades. Educación y Educadores, 16(3), 472-500. doi 10.5294/edu.2013.16.3.5
dc.relationNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationNunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research. A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle.
dc.relationOzoliņš J. T. (2013) Aquinas and his understanding of teaching and learning. In Mooney, T & Nowacki, M. (Eds.), Aquinas, education and the East. Sophia studies in cross-cultural philosophy of traditions and cultures, vol. 4. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.
dc.relationSeow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In Richards, J. C & Renandya, W. A (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching. An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667190.044
dc.relationShor, I. (1992). Empowering education. Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Universidad Santo Tomás. (2004). Proyecto Educativo Institucional-PEI-. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Universidad Santo Tomás. Retrieved from https://www.usta.edu.co/images/documentos/documentos-institucionales/pei.pdf
dc.relationUniversidad Santo Tomás. (2015). Filosofía y cultura institucional I. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Universidad Santo Tomás. Retrieved from http://www.ustamed.edu.co/intranet/pdfs/parte1.pdf
dc.relationXiao, Y. (2007). Applying metacognition in EFL writing instruction in China. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(1), 19- 33.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleThe Role of Problematizing Tutoring in the Development of EFL Students’ Writing Skills1
dc.typeApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Edición de revista o libro de divulgación científica


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución