Análisis comparativo de intercambio de paquetes entre redes definidas por software y redes tradicionales, apoyado en la herramienta de simulación mininet

dc.contributorMancera Lagos, Pedro Alejandro
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-5058
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=tI2C-ioAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000068920
dc.creatorDiaz Torres, Julian David
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-25T21:58:27Z
dc.date.available2020-09-25T21:58:27Z
dc.date.created2020-09-25T21:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-24
dc.identifierDiaz Torres, J. D. (2020). Análisis comparativo de intercambio de paquetes entre redes definidas por software y redes tradicionales, apoyado en la herramienta de simulación mininet. [Documento monográfico de pregrado en Ingeniería de Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Santo Tomás] Repositorio Institucional
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/30066
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractThe following monographic document is objected in order to provide a broad vision which represents Software Defined Networks (SDN) and their interaction towards the future of programmable networks, providing those fresh concepts that day by day obtain more strength in the areas of telecommunications and its data architecture. Openflow is also investigated for its origin and evolution. In the same way, it seeks to carry out a comparative exercise with an educational and practical purpose to analyze the subject in the Mininet software: Virtual network emulator where it allows to visualize various theoretical aspects of Openflow and SDN in an applied way. The simulation is executed in order to recognize the value that the controller has of this novel architecture. It is supported by the mininet graphical interface called Miniedit to achieve a base graphical architecture, where it performs the functions of a layer 2 controller and provides an optimal ecosystem for this document. On the other hand, a network is assembled in Packet tracer in order to make a direct comparison and the feasibility of migration that could exist when you have a traditional network and you want to move towards SDN networks. Currently, telecommunications networks require innovation due to the saturation and rigidity of their infrastructure, which is why SDN is considered as an innovative solution proposal with a large field of research towards a new generation in telecommunications. This document objected a comparative analysis between simulations in traditional networks and those defined by software, where the optimization in the response time over SDN networks is evidenced, even in wide area networks, the size of the packets in each of the data transmission tests, highlighting the superior difference in the Mininet packet size and its speed advantage, guaranteeing an increase in network availability, compared to the traditional network. The bandwidth was analyzed determining the great variability that it presents in traditional networks, while SDN generates a standardization on the time in the transmission of the packets allowing a saving of resources.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherPregrado Ingeniería de Telecomunicaciones
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingeniería de Telecomunicaciones
dc.relation[30] Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Andreas Pamboris, Nathan Farrington, Nelson Huang, Pardis Miri, Sivasankar Radhakrishnan, Vikram Subramanya, and Amin Vahdat, 60 «PortLand: A Scalable Fault-Tolerant Layer 2 Data Center Network Fabric,» ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 39, 2009.
dc.relation[29] Bruno Nunes Astuto, Marc Mendonça, Xuan Nam Nguyen, Katia Obraczka, Thierry Turletti, "A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past ,Present, and Future of Programmable Networks," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2013
dc.relation[28] D. Kreutz et al., ‘‘Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, Jan. 2015
dc.relation[27] A. Doria, J. Hadi Salim, R. Haas, H. Khosravi, W. Wang, L. Dong, R. Gopal, and J. Halpern. Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol Specification. RFC 5810
dc.relation[26] N. Feamster, J. Rexford and E. Zegura, "The Road to SDN: An Intellectual History of Programmable Networks", SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 87-98, 2014
dc.relation[25] “OpenFlow Table Type Patterns,” Open Networking Foundation, Speci- fication, Aug. 2014.
dc.relation[24] A. Blenk, A. Basta, and W. Kellerer, “HyperFlex: An SDN Virtual- ization Architecture with Flexible Hypervisor Function Allocation,” in IFIP/IEEE IM, 2015.
dc.relation[23] J. Kempf, S. Whyte, J. Ellithorpe et al., “OpenFlow MPLS and the Open Source Label Switched Router,” in 23rd International Teletraffic Congress, 2011
dc.relation[22] mininet, “Mininet, Emulador para la creación rápida de prototipos de redes definidas por software” [Online]. Avaliable: https://github.com/mininet.
dc.relation[21] V. project, «VMWare,» VMware, Inc, 2015. [En línea]. Available: https://www.vmware.com.
dc.relation[20] V. project, "VirtualBox," ORACLE, [Online]. Available: https://www.virtualbox.org.
dc.relation[19] ucb-sts, «STS - SDN troubleshooting simulator,» [En línea]. Available: http://ucbsts.github.io/sts/.
dc.relation[18] mininet, "Mininet, An Instant Virtual Network on your Laptop (or other PC)," [Online]. Available: http://mininet.org/.
dc.relation[17] R.W. Thomas, D.H. Friend, L.A. DaSilva, and A.B. MacKenzie, “Cognitive networks: Adaptation and learning to achieve end-to-end performance objectives,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 44, n. 12, Dec. 2006
dc.relation[16] R. Thomas, L. DaSilva, and A. MacKenzie, “Cognitive networks,” in New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005. First IEEE International Symposium on, Nov 2005, pp. 352–360.
dc.relation[15] A. F. Ruiz, “Estado del Arte Redes Definidas Por Software,” Universidad Católica de Pereira, Pereira, 2014
dc.relation[14] U. P. D. E. Cartagena, “Programación de redes SDN mediante el controlador POX,” pp. 1–85, 2015.
dc.relation[13] D. Bolatti et al., “Estudio de Herramientas de Simulación en Redes Definidas por Software,” pp. 176–180.
dc.relation[12] I. E. Carisimo and I. J. I. Alvarez-hamelin, “Razones para usar SDNs Quienes somos CoNexDat es el grupo de Redes Complejas y Comunicación,” 2017.
dc.relation[11] T. Cisco and Y. M. Tik, “ESTUDIO, EVALUACIÓN Y COMPARACIÓN DE PROTOCOLOS DE ENRUTAMIENTO EN TECNOLOGÍAS CISCO Y MIKRO-TIK,” 2016.
dc.relation[10] M. Ramírez and A. López, “Redes de datos definidas por software - SDN, arquitectura, componentes y funcionamiento,” J. Cienc. E Ing., vol. 10, no. 2145–2628, pp. 55–61, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/2DEBYVP
dc.relation[9] M. Barrera, P. Neider, S. Losada, E. Rojas, and G. Mancilla, ESTADO DEL ARTE EN REDES DEFINIDAS POR SOFTWARE (SDN) STATE OF THE ART IN SOFTWARE-DEFINED NETWORKING. 1836.
dc.relation[8] D. Tennenhouse, J. Smith, W. Sincoskie, D. Wetherall, and G. Minden, “A survey of active network research,” Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 1997
dc.relation[7] A. L. Planas, “Configuración De Un Entorno De Emulación Que Permita El Diseño, Desarrollo Y Evaluación De Software- Defined Networks Con Calidad De Servicio,” Ing. en Informática, no. 2003,
dc.relation[6] S. Rodriguez Santamarìa, “Mecanismos de control de las comunicaciones en la internet del futuro a travès de Openflow” Universidad de Cantabria., 2012.
dc.relation[5] D. Álvarez Amézquita, J. Padilla Herrera, A. Garzón Zuluaga, and L. Muñoz Hernández, “Proveedores de Servicios de Internet y de contenidos, responsabilidad civil y derechos de autor,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 51–64, 2009.
dc.relation[4] Universidad técnica de Ambato facultad de ingeniería en sistemas electrónica e industrial “red definida por software (SDN) en base a una infraestructura de software de libre distribución” 2015.
dc.relation[3] E. H. Laos, “DEFINICIÓN DE UN API DE PROGRAMACIÓN PARALELA Y CONCURRENTE DE ALTO NIVEL SOBRE CLUSTERS DE ALTO DESEMPEÑO,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 12 Suppl 1, no. 9, pp. 1–29, 2005, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7990-1.
dc.relation[2] A. Ballesteros, “Seguridad en redes definidas por software,” p. 62, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://rdu.iua.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/1142/1/TF.pdf.
dc.relation[1] U. Cauca, “Método de control cognitivo aplicado al enrutamiento de una red bajo arquitectura sdn/nfv,” 2018.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal
dc.titleAnálisis comparativo de intercambio de paquetes entre redes definidas por software y redes tradicionales, apoyado en la herramienta de simulación mininet


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución