Evaluación mecánica de la unión diente-implante con prótesis parcial fija: análisis por el método de elementos finitos

dc.contributorVillabona López, Camilo
dc.contributorMorales Avila, Iader
dc.creatorBenavides López, Anthony
dc.creatorRagel Duarte, Jose
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T19:17:46Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T19:17:46Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T19:17:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-10
dc.identifierBenavides López, A. M. y Rangel Duarte, J.F. (2020). Evaluación mecánica de la unión diente-implante con prótesis parcial fija: Análisis por el Método de Elementos Finitos [Tesis de Especialización]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/31125
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractOral rehabilitation is in charge of proposing prosthetic options, in order to achieve a treatment with different restorative materials. In partially dentate patients, the treatments used are; removable partial dentures, supported implant fixed partial prostheses, supported dento fixed partial prostheses, and implant supported fixed partial dentures. The present study evaluated the mechanics of the tooth-implant junction in a fixed partial prosthesis with a Morse cone implant. With the incursion of finite element analysis in dental studies, tests very close to reality have been made and valuable estimates can be made in prosthodontics and implantology. Objective: To analyze the total displacements of a virtual model of supported implant-dento fixed partial prosthesis, distribution of main stresses in the periodontal and peri-implant bone surface, distribution and main stresses in the prosthetic abutment and implant in the model of fixed partial implant prosthesis. -dento supported. using the finite element method. Materials and methods: An experimental simulation study was carried out using the Finite Element Method (MEF), with a virtual, non-probabilistic sample. In the model to be designed in Solidworks 2015, the first premolar tooth 24 related to abutment teeth and supporting tissues, the second premolar as pontic and the first molar is a Cone Morse implant. Group 1-experimental: Fixed partial implant-dento prosthesis supported (24-25-26) cemented on abutment (24), pontic (25) and CM implant-pile (26). Group 2-control: Fixed partial denture prosthesis supported (24-25-26) cemented on abutment tooth (24), pontic (25) and abutment tooth (26). Group 3-control: Fixed partial prosthesis Implant supported (24-25-26) cemented on the CM implant-abutment (24) and the CM implant-abutment (26). Results: Tooth-implant: shows a total displacement of the implant-tooth model, whose maximum value of 0.010038 [mm] is obtained in the ceramic of the crown of the abutment tooth 24, this indicates that the lower stiffness of the tooth (lower modulus of elasticity ) produces a greater displacement. The total maximum displacements found in the ceramic of the abutment tooth 24 and pontic 25, are transmitted to the disto-vestibular region of the coronal preparation of tooth 24, being more than double that found in the abutment region, with maximum values of 0.0096 [ mm] and 0.0042 [mm] respectively. Tooth-tooth: When reviewing the total displacements in the model, it is observed that in this case a uniform distribution is reached, finding the most displaced area in the pontic 25, with a maximum displacement value of 0.0105 [mm]. Implant-implant: The maximum total displacements of the Implant-Implant model are found in the abutment prosthetic crown of 24, with a value of 0.0104 [mm]. Conclusions: In supported implant-dento prostheses there is a greater displacement of the abutment tooth in relation to the abutment-implant region. There is greater displacement in the abutment tooth of a supported implant-dento prosthesis in relation to the supported dento prosthesis. The periodontal bone surface presents a similar mechanical function when they are rehabilitated with supported implant-dento prostheses or dento-supported prostheses. The prosthetic abutment exhibits similar mechanical behavior when used on implant-supported or implant-supported prostheses.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherEspecialización Rehabilitación Oral
dc.publisherFacultad de Odontología
dc.relationShillingburg H, Sather D, Wilson E, Cain J, Mitchell D, Blanco L. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Company. 2012.
dc.relationLang N, Pjetursson B, Tan K, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15(6): p. 643- 653.
dc.relationConcha N. Complicaciones y comportamiento de los tratamientos de prótesis fija, realizados en la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Chile, en los años 2004 y 2005. Estudio piloto. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile; 2012.
dc.relationEricsson I, Lekholm U, Brånemark P, Lindhe J, Glantz P, Nyman S. A clinical evaluation of fixed‐bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(4): p. 307-312.
dc.relationGunne J, Åstrand P, Ahlen K, Borg K, Olsson M. Implants in partially edentulous patients. A longitudinal study of bridges supported by both implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3(2): p. 49-56.
dc.relationGunne J, Åstrand P, Lindh T, Borg K, Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10-year report. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12(3): p. 216-221.
dc.relationNickenig H, Schäfer C, Spiekermann H. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth–implant‐supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(5): p. 506-511.
dc.relationAlkharrat A, Schmitter M, Rues S, Rammelsberg P. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22(4): p. 1663-1673.
dc.relationHe Y, Hasan I, Keilig L, Chen J, Pan Q, Huang Y. Combined implant-residual tooth supported prosthesis after tooth hemisection: A finite element analysis. Ann Anat. 2016; 206: p. 96-103.
dc.relationBragger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hammerle C, Lang N. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(1): p. 26- 34.
dc.relationOporto G, Restovic N. Conexión diente implante en rehabilitación bucal. Evaluación clínica y por elementos finítos no lineales. Acta Odontológica Venezolana. 2010; 48(4).
dc.relationTsouknidas A, Giannopoulos D, Savvakis S, Michailidis N, Lympoudi E, Fytanidis D. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. ; 31(6): p. 143-154.
dc.relationChidiak R, Miranda S. Alternativas de diseños de prótesis parcial fija para un caso clínico con pilares mixtos. Revista odontológica de los Andes. 2006; 1.
dc.relationHernández G, Ferrús J, Bascones A. Ferulizaciones dienteimplante. Av Periodon Implantol. 2005; 17(3): p. 165-174.
dc.relationGeng J, Tan K, Liu G. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85(6): p. 585-598.
dc.relationMozayek R, Mozayek M, Allaf M, Abouharb M. The effectiveness of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long span fixed partial denture (threedimensional finite element analysis). J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16(3): p. 259- 263.
dc.relationPratheep K, Abraham A, Annapoorni H, Vigneshwaran S. Comparative evaluation of stresses in tooth implant connected fixed partial denture by varying the implant design and position: a 3D finite element study. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24(4): p. 439- 445.
dc.relationInfantes E. Complicaciones en prótesis fija sobre implantes (Parte 2). Revista Gaceta Dental. 2009.
dc.relationPjetursson B, Brägger U, Lang N, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implantsupported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(3): p. 97- 113.
dc.relationHobkirk J. Prosthodontics: A past with a future? J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71(5).
dc.relationJohn M, Slade G, Szentpétery A, Setz J. Oral Health--Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Fixed, Removable, and Complete Dentures 1 Month and 6 to 12 Months After Treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17(5).
dc.relationHeydecke G, Penrod J, Takanashi Y, Lund J, Feine J, Thomason J. Costeffectiveness of mandibular two-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in the edentulous elderly. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(9): p. 794-799.
dc.relationBrudvik J. Advanced removable partial dentures: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1999.
dc.relationRahn A, Ivanhoe J, Plummer K. Textbook of complete dentures: PMPH-USA; 2009.
dc.relationMcQuade C. Fixed Prosthodontics: Principles and Clinics. J Prosthodont Implant Esthet Reconstr Dent. 2013; 22(3): p. 251-252.
dc.relationCastellanos J, Díaz G, Gay O. Medicina en odontología: Manejo Dent pacientes con enfermedades sistémicas. 2nd ed. Ciudad de México: Man Mod; 2002.
dc.relationOkeson J. Etiología de los trastornos funcionales del sistema masticatorio. La Cart Odontológica. 1995; 3(11): p. 22-28.
dc.relationBudtz-Jørgensen E. Prosthodontics for the elderly: diagnosis and treatment; 1999.
dc.relationSvenson B, Eriksson T, Kronström M, Palmqvist S. Image quality of intraoral radiographs used by general practitioners in prosthodontic treatment planning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 1994; 23(11): p. 46-48.
dc.relationPegoraro L, Valle A, Araujo C, Bonfante G, Conti P, Bonachela V. Prótesis fija: Prótesis fija; 2001.
dc.relationMotta A, Pereira L, Da Cunha A. All-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures: a comparative study by 2D finite element analyses. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007; 15(5): p. 399-405.
dc.relationSailer I, Pjetursson B, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle C. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all‐ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(3): p. 86-96.
dc.relationTinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate--, Alumina-, and Zirconia-Based Three-Unit Fixed Partial Dentures: A Laboratory Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14(3).
dc.relationSailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler L, Luthy H, Hammerle C. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20(4).
dc.relationGoodacre C, Naylor W. Single implant and crown versus fixed partial denture: a cost-benefit, patient-centered analysis. Eur J Oral Implant. 2016; 9(1): p. 559–68.
dc.relationShemtov K, Rittel D. An Overview of the Mechanical Integrity of Dental Implants. BioMed Research International. 2015.
dc.relationSaini MSY, Arora P, Arora V, Jain K. Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2015 January; 3(1): p. 52-57.
dc.relationBicudo P, Reis J, Deus A, Reis L, Vaz M. Mechanical bejaviour of dental implants. Procedia Structural Integrity 1. 2016;: p. 26-33.
dc.relationMahajan A, Kadam K. The Influence of Mechanical Loads on the Biomechanics of Dental Implant. International Journal of Science and Research. 2014; 3(11): p. 1085- 1090.
dc.relationKhatri S, Palekar U, Srivastava R, Jain A. Implant biomechanics. NJDSR. 2015; 3(1): p. 37-40.
dc.relationCabello G, González D, Aixelá M, Casero A, Giménez J. Biomecánica en implantología. Periodoncia y Osteointegración. 2005; 15(5): p. 311-326.
dc.relationZabalegui I. Influencia de la ubicación de los implantes sobre la restauración definitiva. RCOE. 2002; 7(1): p. 47-54.
dc.relationHa ̈ıat G, Wang H, Brunski J. Effects of Biomechanical Properties of the Bone– Implant Interface on Dental Implant Stability: From In Silico Approaches to the Patient’s Mouth. Annu. Rev. Biomed. 2014; 16: p. 187-213.
dc.relationBicudo P, Reis J, Deus A, Reis L, Vaz M. Mechanical behaviour of dental implants. Procedia Structural Integrity 1. 2016;: p. 26-33.
dc.relationArano J, Giner L, Cortada M, Gil J, Lucena J. La interfase de conexión implantaria en el espacio crevicular. Ajustes protésicos de los materiales. Parte I. Periodoncia. 2001; 11(4): p. 291-302.
dc.relationKuramochi G, Del Sol M. Método para la Generación de Modelos de Elementos Finitos de Dientes. Int. J. Morphol. 2013; 31(3): p. 997-1002.
dc.relationLotti S, Machado W, Mazzieiro T, Landre J. Aplicabilidade científica do método dos elementos finitos. Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial. 2006; 11(2): p. 35-43.
dc.relationVallejo L, Hidalgo A, Hernández A, Lobo F, Gil-Carcedo E, Gil-Carcedo L. Design and Experimental Analysis of a New Malleovestibulopexy Prosthesis Using a Finite Element Model of the Human Middle Ear. Acta Otorrinolaringologica. 2014; 66(1): p. 16-27.
dc.relationPérez L, Briones F, Lascano F, Aguilar C. Análisis de esfuerzos mediante el método de elementos finitos de implantes dentales de titanio poroso. Ingeniería y Desarrollo. 2015; 33(1): p. 80-97.
dc.relationVillarraga-Ossa J, Diosa-Peña J, Vélez-Muriel S, Latorre-Correa F, Escobar- Restrepo J. Metodología alternativa para elaborar modelos geométricos de anatomía dental. Rev. CES Odont. 2015; 28(2): p. 133-139.
dc.relationVasudeva G. Finite element analysis: A Boon to Dental Research. The Internet Journal of Dental Science. 2009; 6(2).
dc.relationEspinoza C, Niño Y. Modelación Numérica en Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental; 2001.
dc.relationTanne K, Inoue Y, Sakuda M. Biomechanical behavior of the periodontiun before and after orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod, Appleton. 1995; 65(2): p. 123- 128.
dc.relationOrozco M, Villarraga J, Latorre F, Escobar J. Influencia de los materiales de cementación en la distribución de los esfuerzos en un incisivo central superior rehabilitado con poste. análisis de elementos finitos. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2011; 23(1): p. 56-75.
dc.relationChica E, Latorre F, Agudelo S. Prótesis parcial fija: análisis biomecánico sobre distribución de esfuerzos entre tres alternativas de retención. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2010; 21(2): p. 150-158.
dc.relationAsmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(4): p. 321-329.
dc.relationPegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchtti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. J Biomater. 2002; 23(13): p. 2667-2682.
dc.relationTada S, Stegariu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/ strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3- dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18(3): p. 367-368.
dc.relationVillabona C. Análise pelo método dos elementos finitos da distribuição de tensões em tecido ósseo periimplantar, componentes protéticos e implantes com conexão cone morse e hexágono externo reabilitados com diferentes desenhos protéticos na região anterior da maxila. Tesis PhD. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Pós-Graduação em Odontologia; 2017.
dc.relationLoyola-González P, Torassa D, Dominguez A. Estudio comparativo sobre el comportamiento y la distribución de las tensiones en implantes dentales cortos e implantes dentales estándares en la región posterior del maxilar superior. Un estudio en elementos finitos. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral. 2016; 9(1): p. 36-41.
dc.relationEcheverry A, Pachas R, Durán C, Rodríguez A. Influencia de la forma y ubicación de los contactos proximales sobre los niveles de tensión generados en la prótesis fija implanto soportada. Análisis de elementos finitos. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2014.
dc.relationResolución No 008430. Normas Científicas, técnicas y Administrativas para la Investigación en Salud.. Santafé de Bogotá DC :; 1993.
dc.relationDirección Nacional de Derecho de Autor. Normatividad y Jurisprudencia- Leyes.
dc.relationChaiwat U, Pimduen R, Chaiy R, Pathawee K. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three‐dimensional dynamic finite element study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019; 5(1): p. 26–37.
dc.relationChaiwat U, Pimduen R, Chaiy R, Pathawee K. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three‐dimensional dynamic finite element study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019; 5(1): p. 26–37.
dc.relationPérez-Pevida E, Brizuela-Velasco A, Chávarri-Prado D, Jiménez-Garrudo A, Sánchez-Lasheras F, Solaberrieta-Méndez E, et al. Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Noviembre.
dc.relationKarl M. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Febrero; 19(1): p. 30-7.
dc.relationUlbrich N. Estudo da distribuição das tensões no sistema de implantes IMZ nos três elementos intramóveis com cargas verticais. PCL: Rev. Bras. Prótese Clín. Lab., Curitiba. 2000; 2(5): p. 32-38.
dc.relationMeijer H, Starmans F, Bosman F, Steen W. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1993; 20(2): p. 147–157.
dc.relationKitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Influence ofmarginal bone resorption on stress around an implant— a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005; 32(4): p. 279–286.
dc.relationPapavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne S, Felton D. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stressdistribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996; 76(6): p. 633–640.
dc.relationBevilacqua Mea. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2011; 105(1): p. 5-13.
dc.relationDegidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2011; 22(11): p. 1303-7.
dc.relationDing Xea. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2009; 11(4): p. 279-87.
dc.relationDemenko Vea. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection. J. Dent. Res. 2011; 90(10): p. 1211-5.
dc.relationGalindo-Moreno Pea. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants - 1-year follow-up. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2012; 23(5): p. 609- 16.
dc.relationFazi Gea. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2011; 26(4): p. 752-9.
dc.relationKimura Kea. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data. J. Oral Implantol. 2011; 37: p. 96-105.
dc.relationAnitua Eea. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int. J. Perio. Rest. Dent. 2010 Febrero; 30(1): p. 89-95.
dc.relationAkça K, Iplikçioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever exstress in mandibular posterior edentulism. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(4): p. 350-6.
dc.relationTorcato LB ea. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114(5): p. 644- 51.
dc.relationAloise JPea. Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(3): p. 328-35.
dc.relationBelser UCea. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations. Supplement 1. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: p. 126-45.
dc.relationSutter Fea. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system. Design and engineering. Int. J. Perio. Rest. Dent. 1993; 13(5): p. 408–431.
dc.relationBouazza-Juanes K ea. Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone: A finite element study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Octubre; 7(4): p. 483-8.
dc.relationSahabi M ea. Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 Mayo; 10(4): p. 338-50.
dc.relationMartini AP ea. Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Marzo; 23(2): p. 415-8.
dc.relationBurguete R, Johns R, King T, Patterson E. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Junio; 71(6): p. 592- 9.
dc.relationMaminskas J ea. The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Septiembre; 9(7).
dc.relationZarone Fea. Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14(1): p. 103-14.
dc.relationIsidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleEvaluación mecánica de la unión diente-implante con prótesis parcial fija: análisis por el método de elementos finitos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución