Evaluación de las actitudes explícitas e implícitas frente a los candidatos presidenciales del año 2018 a través del Procedimiento de Evaluación Relacional Implícita (IRAP)

dc.contributorQuiroga Baquero, Luis Alberto
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-9860
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=psB0kvkAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001048902
dc.contributorhttps://scienti.colciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000004420
dc.creatorPeñalver Salcedo, Angela
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T02:08:53Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T02:08:53Z
dc.date.created2019-10-05T02:08:53Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-30
dc.identifierPeñalver Salcedo, A. (2019). Evaluación de las actitudes explícitas e implícitas frente a los candidatos presidenciales del año 2018 a través del procedimiento de evaluación relacional implícita (IRAP)
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/19057
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the relational repertoires and the explicit and implicit activities of a group of Colombians against the presidential candidates of the year 2018, in order to provide empirical evidence around the behavioral dynamics that underlie the exercise of voting as Legal and socially regulated behavior. 876 Colombians participated, adults, who suffer from their explicit attitudes towards five candidates (Gustavo Petro, Iván Duque, Humberto de la calle, Germán Vargas and Sergio Fajardo), participated through a data questionnaire personal, sociodemographic and political information; subsequently they chose one of ten Implicit Relational Evaluation Procedures (IRAP), in which they had their implicit attitudes made a couple of eligible candidates. The corresponding results correspond to the explicit electoral preference, the intention to vote for a candidate and the affiliation to the party corresponding to the candidate; nevertheless, the implicit measures evaluated through the IRAP that affect some circumstances, the limitations and intentions of voting are not related to explicit favorable attitudes by a candidate, but for negative attitudes towards the opposing candidate. The findings of this research are discussed in terms of their implications on the study of behavioral processes linked to voting behavior, and on the fields of study of legal and political psychology.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherMaestría Psicología Jurídica
dc.publisherFacultad de Psicología
dc.relationAguilera, T. (2002). Implicaciones de la violencia política en la intención de voto y en el comportamiento electoral. Reflexión Política, 4(7), 2-13. doi: 10.29375/01240781.809
dc.relationAlbarracin, D., Wang, W., Li, H., & Noguchi, K. (2011). Structure of attitudes: Judgments, memory, and implications for change. En Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 19-40). Taylor and Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203838068
dc.relationAmerican Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association
dc.relationAmerican Psychological Association. (2018). Rules and Procedures - Ethics Committee of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
dc.relationArcuri, L., Castelli, L, Galdi, S., Zogmaister, C., & Amadori, A. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29(3), 369–387.
dc.relationAyala, A. (2012). La utilización del Test de Asociación Implícita en los procesos electorales. Tribunal Electoral del poder judicial de la Federación, 10, 267-292.
dc.relationAyala, A., & Martínez, D. (2013). Análisis de los resultados del Test de Asociación Implícita de la elección Presidencial mexicana del 2012. Tribunal Electoral del poder judicial de la Federación, 59-99.
dc.relationBanaji, M., Lemm, K., & Carpenter, S. (2001). The Social Unconscious. En A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interindividual Processes (pp. 134-158). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
dc.relationBarbero-Rubio, A., López-López, J., Luciano, C., & Eisenbeck, N. (2016). Perspective-taking measured by Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). The Psychological Record, 66, 1-10
dc.relationBarnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 434-445. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001
dc.relationBarnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you know what you really believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Evaluation Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.
dc.relationBarnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Bowles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527-542.
dc.relationBarnes-Holmes, D., Finn, M., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2017). Derived stimulus relations and their role in a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. Behavior Analyst, 41, 155-173. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0124-7
dc.relationBarnes-Holmes, D., Murtagh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes towards meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60, 287-306.
dc.relationBaron, R., & Byrne, D. (2005). Psicología Social. Madrid: Pearson.
dc.relationBeltrán, C., & Sandoval, M. (2015). Efecto de la capacitación y el diseño del tarjetón sobre la comprensión y la validez del voto. Universitas Psychologica, 14, 1067-1076. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-3.ecdt
dc.relationBriñol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C., & Sierra, B. (2002). Cambio de actitudes implícitas. Psicothema, 14(4), 771-775
dc.relationBrussino, S., Alonso D., & Dreizik, M. (2013). Psicología política del comportamiento de voto: la elección presidencial 2011 en Argentina. Psicología Política, 13(28), 453-470.
dc.relationBrussino, S., Alonso, D., & Imhoff, D. (2015). Dimensiones culturales, afectivas y cognitivas del comportamiento de voto al Kirchnerismo. Psicologia y Sociedades (27)2, 351-361. doi: 10.1590/1807-03102015v27n2p351
dc.relationCárdenas, M., & Barrientos, J. (2008). The attitudes toward lesbians and gay men scale (ATLG): Adaptation and testing the reliability and validity in Chile. Journal of Sex Research, 45(2), 140-149. doi: 10.1080/00224490801987424
dc.relationCárdenas, M., González, C., Calderón, C., & Lay, S. (2009). Medidas explícitas e implícitas de las actitudes hacia las mujeres. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 43(3), 541-546.
dc.relationClemente, M. (2012). Papel de las ciencias sociales y del comportamiento en la Ley. Psicología Política, 44, 87-107
dc.relationCongreso de la Republica de Colombia. (2011). Ley 1475 de 2011. Por la cual se adoptan las reglas de organización y funcionamiento de los partidos y movimientos políticos, de los procesos electorales y se dictan otras disposiciones. Recuperado de http://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=43332
dc.relationCorte Constitucional de Colombia. Sala Plena. (1997). Sentencia C-337-97. Magistrado ponente Carlos Gaviria Díaz. Recuperado de http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1997/C-337-97.htm
dc.relationDixon, M., Rehfeldt, R., Zlomke, K., & Robinson, A. (2006). Exploring the development and dismantling of equivalence classes involving terrorist stimuli. The Psychological Record, 56, 83–103.
dc.relationDrake, C., Krammer, S., Habib, R., Schuler, R., Blankenship, L., & Locke. (2015). Honest politics: Honest politics: Evaluating candidate perceptions for the 2012 U.S. election with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(2), 129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.04.004
dc.relationDymond, S., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2013). Advances in Relational Frame Theory: Research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
dc.relationElías, G. (2015). Las campañas electorales negativas. Revista Científica Semestral IN IURE, 2, 46-63.
dc.relationFarrell, L., Cochrane, A., & McHugh, L. (2015). Exploring attitudes towards gender and science: The advantages of an IRAP approach versus the IAT. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 121-128. doi: 2015.04.002
dc.relationFriese, M., Bluemke, M., & Wänke, M. (2007). Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: The 2002 German parliamentary election. Experimental Psychology, 54(4), 247-255. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.247
dc.relationFriese, M., Smith, C., Plischke, T., Bluemke, M., & Nosek, B. (2012). Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters? PLoS ONE 7(8), e44130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130
dc.relationFowler, J., Baker, L., & Dawes, C. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. The American Political Science Review, 102, 233-248. doi S0003055408080209
dc.relationGreenwald, A., Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. doi: 0022-3514.85.2.197
dc.relationGross, A., & Fox, E. (2009). Relational Frame Theory: an overview of the controversy. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 87-98. doi: 10.1007/BF03393073
dc.relationGrossi, F., Herrero, F., Rodríguez, F., & Fernández, J. (2000). Conducta de voto en los jóvenes. Psicothema, 12(2), 255-259.
dc.relationHaidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. Why good people are divides by politics and religion. New York: Vintage Books
dc.relationHayes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
dc.relationHughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016a). Relational Frame Theory: The Basic Account. En R. Zettle, S. Hayes, D. Barnes- Holmes & A. Biglan. The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (129-179). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.relationHughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016b). Relational Frame Theory: Implications for the study of human language and cognition. En R. Zettle, S. Hayes, D. Barnes- Holmes & A. Biglan. The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (179-227). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.relationHussey, I., Barnes- Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). From Relational Frame Theory to implicit attitudes and back again: clarifying the link between RFT and IRAP research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.009
dc.relationKissi, A., Hughes, S., De Schryver, M., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2018). Examining the moderating impact of plys and tracks on the insensitivity effect: a preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record, 68, 431-440. doi: 10.1007/s40732-018-0286-z
dc.relationKissi, A., Hughes, S., Mertens, G., Barnes-Holmes, D., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2017). A Systematic review of pliance, tracking, and augmenting. Behavior Modification, 41, 683-707. doi: 10.1177/0145445517693811
dc.relationKuschick, M.(2006). Encuesta de opinión, imagen y cambio de actitud. Revista mexicana de ciencias politicas y sociales, XLVIII. Mexico. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmcps/v48n196/0185-1918-rmcps-48-196-143.pdf
dc.relationLane, K., Banaji, M., Nosek, B., & Greenwald, A. (2007). Understanding and using the Implict Association Test: IV. What we know (so far). En B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59-102). New York: Guilford Press.
dc.relationLiscano-Cleves, L., Polania-Garzón, M. & Quiroga-Baquero, L. (2018). Defensores de familia en la toma de decisiones administrativas: Actitudes implícitas y explícitas. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 11(1), 101-111.
dc.relationLuna, E., Zambrano, C., Ceballos, A., & Villalobos, F. (2017). Validación un procedimiento estandarizado de medición de actitudes implícitas frente al suicidio. Revista CES Psicología, 10(2), 66-85. doi: 10.21615/cesp.10.2.5
dc.relationMaloney, E. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Exploring the behavioral dynamics of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: The role of relational contextual cues versus relational coherence indicators as response options. Psychological Record, 66, 395. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0180-5
dc.relationMontero, M., & Dorna, A. (1993). La Psicología Política: Una Disciplina En La Encrucijada. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 25, 7-15.
dc.relationNavia, P., & del Pozo, B. (2012). Los efectos de la voluntariedad del voto y de la inscripción automática en Chile. Estudios Públicos, 127, 161-191
dc.relationNosek, B., Graham, J., & Hawkins, C. (2010). Implicit political cognition. En B. Gawronski, & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 548–564). New York: Guilford Press
dc.relationOcampo, N. (2016). La intención de voto frente a la decisión del ciudada- no. Elecciones para la alcaldía de Manizales - 2005. Ambiente Jurídico, 21. pp. 67-88
dc.relationParling, T., Cernvall, M., Stewart, I., Barnes‐Holmes, D., & Ghaderi, A. (2012). Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to compare implicit pro‐thin/anti‐fat attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa and nonclinical controls. Eating Disorders 20, 127–143.
dc.relationPosgrados en Psicología Jurídica - Universidad Santo Tomas. (2016). Definición de la Psicología Jurídica. Recuperado de https://facultadpsicologia.usta.edu.co/index.php/investigacion-maestria2
dc.relationPresno, M. (2011). El derecho de voto. Un derecho político fundamental. Recuperado de https://presnolinera.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/el-derecho-de-voto-un-derecho-polc3adtico-fundamental-libro.pdf
dc.relationRaccuia, L. (2016). Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) predict voting behavior of decided and undecided voters in Swiss referendums. Plos One, 11(10), e0163872. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163872
dc.relationRemue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Vanderhasselt, D., & De Raedt, R. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self- versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition and Emotion, 27(8), 1441–1449.
dc.relationRendón, M., & Quiroga-Baquero, L. (2017). Investigación traslacional en el estudio de marcos deícticos: reflexiones a partir de un trabajo experimental. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 43, 97-127. doi: 10.5514/rmac.v43.i1.61078
dc.relationRoche, B., Ruiz, M., O’Riordan, M., & Hand, K. (2005). A relational frame approach to the psychological assessment of sex offenders. En M. Taylor & E. Quayle (Eds.), Viewing child pornography on the Internet: Understanding the offence, managing the offender, and helping the victims (pp. 109–125). Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing.
dc.relationRubiano, J., & Barreto, M. (2015). Relación entre variables sociodemográficas, psicosociales y de marketing político en la conducta de voto y abstencionismo en jóvenes. Perspectiva Empresarial, 2(1), 61-74. doi: 10.16967/rpe.v2n1a4
dc.relationSidman, M. (2018). What is interesting about equivalence relations and behavior? Perspectives in Behavior Science, 41, 33-43. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-0166-5
dc.relationSkinner, B.F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. En B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.) Problem solving: Research, method and theory (pp. 133-171). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relationVázquez, J., Panadero, S., & Paz, P. (2008). Implicación de las actitudes y desesperanza en la participación electoral de estudiantes españoles y latinoamericanos. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 551-564.
dc.relationZettle, R., Hayes, S., Barnes- Holmes, D., & Biglan, A. (2016). The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleEvaluación de las actitudes explícitas e implícitas frente a los candidatos presidenciales del año 2018 a través del Procedimiento de Evaluación Relacional Implícita (IRAP)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución