dc.contributorHernández Cruz, Harold Wilson
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-6703
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=DtuTZIMAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001592345
dc.contributorUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.creatorReyes Zuluaga, Julio Cesar
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T18:35:16Z
dc.date.available2021-12-20T18:35:16Z
dc.date.created2021-12-20T18:35:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-09
dc.identifierReyes Zuluaga, J.C. (2021).Guía metodológica para la evaluación de los riesgos de soborno. [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/38739
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractWhen Colombia joined the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), it assumed a series of commitments in the fight against corruption and specifically against bribery, expressly establishing the obligation to take actions to neutralize the commission of this type of conduct. This research specifically seeks to structure a methodology that allows identifying and preventing possible acts of bribery in public sector entities and allowing them to generate alerts that facilitate the adoption of corrective actions for the prevention and mitigation of risks related to the phenomenon of bribery, and of In this way, strengthen the fight against corruption through a procedure that is applicable to all institutions of the Colombian public sector. The methodology for assessing the risks of bribery seeks to prevent the materialization of acts of corruption and generate a culture against bribery crimes in the National Superintendency of Health and other superintendencies and public sector entities that decide to adopt it, especially to facilitate adoption. of the pertinent controls that allow to avoid bad practices related to the events that have to do with bribery. In this sense, the Colombian state has been making efforts to generate measures to counteract it by promoting ethics among public sector officials through policies, plans and programs articulated with the Integrated Planning and Management Model (MIPG) led by the Administrative Department of the Public Function (DAFP); Similarly, the Colombian Institute of Technical Standards and Certification ICONTEC ratified in 2011 and 2017 the NTC-ISO 31000 and NTC-ISO 37001 standards respectively, standards that establish principles for risk management and their integration into the processes first and principles and good practices for the management of anti-bribery risk the second, facilitating its implementation in organizations. The guide proposed in this investigation is aimed at generating preventive actions for public officials and facilitating the implementation of reasonable policies, procedures and controls to counteract the risks of bribery faced by public sector organizations, and is especially aimed at Senior officials, where decisions related to the management of public resources or functions related to the procedures carried out by the entity are made, in order to satisfy the requirements of interest groups or services within the organization , among those, those who lead the processes of human talent, internal control and hiring. The methodology includes the following steps: 1) Implementation of the anti-bribery policy; 2) identification of the risks and critical points of bribery risks in the entity's processes; 3) assessment of bribery risks; 4) adoption of measures to address the risks of bribery identified; 5) systematization of the information obtained in the previous steps; 6) communication and consultation with relevant stakeholders. In each of the steps of the methodology, there are the formats required to collect the necessary information for the management of this type of risk, in order to implement bribery prevention actions in the National Superintendence of Health or in other public entities who decide to adopt this methodology.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherMaestría Calidad y Gestión Integral
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingeniería Mecánica
dc.relationCastillo, J. (2018). Gestión del riesgo de Soborno en el Proceso de Otorgar Licencia de Funcionamiento. Obtenido de https://repositorio.up.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11354/2438/Jorge_Tesis_maestria_2018.pdf?sequence=1
dc.relationEscorial Bonet, Á., Escalera Alcazar, J., Quintana, S. S., & Mendez, J. C. (2019). Guía para la aplicación de UNE-ISO 31000:2018. Madrid: Aenor.
dc.relationFallo en Primera Instancia Sancionatorio, IUS- 2018-022471 IUC-D- 2018-1064860 (Procuraduría General de la Nación - Grupo Élite Anticorrupción - Subgrupo Disciplinario 30 de Noviembre de 2020).
dc.relationFiscalia General de la Nación. (2018). Boletín 24414. Bogotá: Fiscalia General de la Nación.
dc.relationFlores, C. P. (7 de Mayo de 2017). ¿Corrupción hasta cuándo? The Economy Journal, pág. 1.
dc.relationGonzález Martínez, R. (2015). Marco Integrado de Control Interno. Modelo COSO III. Lima: Qualpro Consulting.
dc.relationGonzález, J. (2018). Odebrecht la Historia Completa. Bogotá D.C.: Aguilar.
dc.relationGRI Group. (2021). Advantages: ISO Anti-Bribery Management System Certification. Londres: DRI Group.
dc.relationISO 31000. (Febrero de 2018). Gestión de Riesgos. ISO 31000 Gestión de Riesgos. Ginebra, Suiza: ISO.
dc.relationISO 37001 2016. (s.f.). ISO 37001 2016. ISO 37001 Sistema de Gestión Antisoborno. Ginebra, Suiza: ISO.
dc.relationLey 599 de 2000, art. 433. (s.f.). Diario Oficial No. 44.097. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationLizarzaburu Bolaños, E. R., Barriga, G., Burneo, K., & Noriega, E. (2018). Gestión Integral de Riesgos y Antisoborno: Un Enfoque Operacional desde la Perspectiva ISO 31000 e ISO 37001. Universidad & Empresa, 21, 79-118.
dc.relationManrique Villanueva, L., & Eslava Schmalbach, J. (2011). Auscultando la Corrupción en la Salud: Definición y Causas ¿Que está en juego? Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología Vol. 62 No. 4, 308-314.
dc.relationMoreno, L. A. (14 de Diciembre de 2017). World Economic Forum. Obtenido de https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/12/how-technology-is-becoming-a-powerful-ally-in-the-fight-against-corruption-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/
dc.relationNorton, E. C., & Lindrooth, R. C. (1998). Controlling for the Endogeneity of peer Substance use on Adolescent Alcohol and Tobaco use. Healkth Economics, 439 - 453.
dc.relationNTC-ISO 37001. (19 de Abril de 2017). Normat Técnica Colombiana ISO 37001:2017. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: ICONTEC.
dc.relationONUDD. (2020). Una guía sobre la Condución y Evaluación de Riesgos de Corrupción en Organismos públicos. Vienna, Austria: United Nations.
dc.relationOrganizacioón Internacional de las Entidades Fiscalizadoras Superiores. (2016). Plan Estratégico 2017-2022. Viena, Austria: INTOSAI.
dc.relationPacto Global Red Colombia. (2018). Boletín General de febrero de 2018. Bogotá D.C.: Pacto Global Colombia.
dc.relationPresidencia de la República. (2018). Informe de la República de Colombia sobre las medidas adoptadas y el progreso realizado en la. Bogotá D.C.
dc.relationPWC. (2016). Evaluación de los Riesgos de Soborno y Corrupción en su Empresa. Sydney: PwC´s.
dc.relationReyes Zuluaga, J. C. (2020). Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Santo tomás. Obtenido de Revisión bibliográfica de los sistemas de gestión y la lucha contra la corrupción en el Sector Público Colombiano: https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/28098
dc.relationSecretaría de Transparencia de la Presidencia de la República de Colombia. (Septiembre de 2020). Observatorio de Transparencia y Anticorrupción. Obtenido de http://www.secretariatransparencia.gov.co/observatorio-anticorrupcion
dc.relationSupersalud. (2014). Monitor Estratégico. Modificación de la estructura de la Superintendencia nacional de salud, 17 - 28.
dc.relationSupersalud. (20 de Enero de 2020). Resolución 160 de 2020. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Supersalud
dc.relationTablante, C., & Morales Antoniazzi, M. (2018). Impacto de la Corrupción en los Derechos Humanos. Mexico: Talleres Gráficos del Poder Ejecutivo.
dc.relationTransparency International. (2020). Corruptión Perceptions Index 2020. Berlin: Transparency International.
dc.relationTransparency International España. (2021). Barómetro Global de la Corrupción – Unión Europea 2021. Madrid: Transparency International.
dc.relationUniversidad de Birmingham. (2011). Supporting Anti-Corruption Reform in Partner Countries . Luxemburg: European Commission.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAcceso restringido
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleGuía Metodológica para la Evaluación de los Riesgos de Soborno


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución