Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo

dc.contributorJairo Camilo, Zamora Escobar
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-8311
dc.contributorhttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZDw_wlIAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001526877
dc.contributorUniversidad Santo Tomas
dc.creatorCaro Álvarez, Laura Daniela
dc.creatorLagos Duarte, Yuneisy
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T15:58:46Z
dc.date.available2021-05-13T15:58:46Z
dc.date.created2021-05-13T15:58:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-22
dc.identifierCaro Álvarez, L. & Lagos Duarte Y. (2021). Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/34060
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.description.abstractThe first theoretical debate in international relations was realism and liberalism. This debate resulted from opposition to the realistic school that defended the national interest and the liberals who rejected the international policy of war inevitability. systematic approaches to international relations related different features to explain historical events. Throughout the history of international relations, transcendental eventualities have occurred in the reconstitution of political and territorial power; The research therefore intends to analyze the Second World War as a relevant event in international relations from two theories: liberalism and realism, following a qualitative research methodology, since it studies, describes and explains a historical event considering this phenomenon and its components, by measuring concepts and defining variables. The research is based on secondary sources such as; documents, articles, magazines, books, publications, etc ...
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherPregrado Negocios Internacionales
dc.publisherFacultad de Negocios Internacionales
dc.relationAddams, J. (2002). Democracy and social ethics. University of Illinois Press.
dc.relationAlexander Bird. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions and its significance: An essay review of the fiftieth anniversary edition. Oxford Publishing Limited(England). https://doi.org/10.2307/23356448
dc.relationBashota, B. (2016). The role of theory of international relations in explicating global political events. ILIRIA International Review, 1, 37. https://doi.org/10.21113/iir.v1i1.198
dc.relationBerlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge.
dc.relationBeveridge, William Henry Beveridge Baron. (1942). Social insurance and allied services: Beveridge report. HM Stationery Office.
dc.relationBoesche, R. (2019a). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press.
dc.relationBoesche, R. (2019b). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press.
dc.relationBuchan, B. (2002). Explicando la guerra y la paz: Kant y la teoría liberal del IR. Alternatives, 27(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700401
dc.relationBurchill, S. (2013). Theories of international relations (5. ed. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relationBuzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2018). Explanation, geopolitics, and liberalism: A reply to luke cooper. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), E92-E97. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12160
dc.relationCowling, M. (1990). Mill and liberalism. Cambridge Core, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558412
dc.relationDe Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the rights of woman and the female citizen. The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, , 124-129.
dc.relationDEUDNEY, D., & IKENBERRY, G. J. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795
dc.relationDonnelly, J. (2012). The differentiation of international societies: An approach to structural international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111411208
dc.relationDonnelly, J. (2019). Systems, levels, and structural theory: Waltz's theory is not a systemic theory (and why that matters for international relations today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), 904-930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929
dc.relationDrezner, D. W. (2019). Technological change and international relations. International Relations, 33(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629
dc.relationEadeh, F. R., & Chang, K. K. (2020). Can threat increase support for liberalism? new insights into the relationship between threat and political attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919
dc.relationElman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2008). The role of history in international relations. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097644
dc.relationEriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2006). The information revolution, security, and international relations: (IR)relevant theory? International Political Science Review, 27(3), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106064462
dc.relationFrieden, J. A., & Lake, D. A. (2005). International relations as a social science: Rigor and relevance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600, 136-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276732
dc.relationGibbons, M. (1999). Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761), C81-C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576
dc.relationGilbert, A. N. (1968). International relations and the relevance of history. International Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013522
dc.relationGrancay, M., & Szikorova, N. (2014). Liberalism in foreign trade versus liberalism in air transportation is there a link? Panoeconomicus, 61(6), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1406709G
dc.relationHarrison, K., & Boyd, T. (2018). Liberalism.https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137951.00014
dc.relationHasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others?: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769867
dc.relationHayek Friedrich, A. v. (1960). The constitution of liberty. South Bend, IN: Gateway,
dc.relationHayek, F. A. (1944). A.(1944) the road to serfdom. Dymock’s Book Arcade,
dc.relationHobson, J. M., & Lawson, G. (2008). What is history in international relations? Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097648
dc.relationHodgskin, T. (1900). Labour defended against the claims of capital. BEIJING BOOK CO. INC.
dc.relationIkenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberalism in a realist world. International Studies, 46(1-2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600213
dc.relationKant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason, norman kemp smith. New York: St.Martins,
dc.relationKant, I. (1983). Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett Publishing.
dc.relationKeohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty years of institutional liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451
dc.relationLebow, R. N. (2011). Philosophy and international relations. International Affairs, 87(5), 1216-+. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01030.x
dc.relationLees, N. (2016). International society is to international system as world society is to...? systemic and societal processes in english school theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.20
dc.relationLijphart, A. (1974). The structure of the theoretical revolution in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 18(1), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600260
dc.relationLocke, J. (1689b). The second treatise of government (an essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government) and A letter concerning toleration
dc.relationMengistie, S. (2013). The structure of scientific revolutions (thomas S. kuhn, 1970, 2nd ed. chicago, london: University of chicago press ltd. 210 pages). Philosophical Papers and Review, 4, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2013.0102
dc.relationMontesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat de, & Cohler, A. M. (1989). The spirit of the laws (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press.
dc.relationMoravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
dc.relationOwen, J. M. (2018). Liberalism and its alternatives, again. International Studies Review, 20(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy026
dc.relationPaine, T. (2011). Rights of man. Broadview Press.
dc.relationRand, A. (1993). The fountainhead (1943). New York: Signet,
dc.relationRawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.
dc.relationRawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press.
dc.relationScholte, J. A. (2019). After liberal global democracy: New methodology for new praxis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00265-3
dc.relationSegrillo, A. (2012). Liberalism, marxism and democratic theory revisited: Proposal of a joint index of political and economic democracy. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(2), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212012000200001
dc.relationShimko, K. I. (1992). Realism, neorealism, and american liberalism. The Review of Politics, 54(2), 281-301.
dc.relationShiping, T. (2014). International system, not international structure: Against the agent-structure problematique in IR. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou046
dc.relationShklar, J., & Rosenblum, N. L. (1989). The liberalism of fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, , 149-166.
dc.relationSmith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen.
dc.relationSpencer, H. (1969). The man versus the state (1884). Herbert Spencer: Political Writings,
dc.relationSpinoza, B., & de Spinoza, B. (2007). Spinoza: Theological-political treatise. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationStephen M. Walt. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275
dc.relationT.E., A. H. B. AND J. L. (2018, Ago 29,). The literature of liberalism. The Economist, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/29/the-literature-of-liberalism
dc.relationTaylor Mill, H. (1868). The enfranchisement of women. 1851. London, Trübner and Co,
dc.relationTocqueville, A. d. (1992). De la démocratie en amérique (1840). Paris: Les Editions Gallimard, 2, 506-1193.
dc.relationTocqueville, A. d. (2000). Democracy in america. 1835. Trans.Harvey C.Mansfield and Delba Winthrop.Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
dc.relationWaltz, K. N. (2007). Theory of international politics (1. ed., [Nachdr.] ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relationWilliams, M. C. (2013). In the beginning: The international relations enlightenment and the ends of international relations theory.European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495477
dc.relationWilson, P. (2011). Gilbert murray and international relations: Hellenism, liberalism, and international intellectual cooperation as a path to peace. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 881-909. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000744
dc.relationWitt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053-1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7
dc.relationWollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. 1792. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, 5, 79-266.
dc.relationXidias, J., & Jackson, I. (2017). The end of history and the last man (1ª ed.). Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282135
dc.relationBastiat, F. (1850). Membre correspondant de l'Institut. Représentant du peuple à l'Assemblée Nationale, (The Law) (Paris: Guillaumin, 1850). 80 pp. [OC4, pp. 342-93] [CW2.9, pp. 107-46]Berlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge.
dc.relationFukuyama, F. (1992). History and Theory, 32(2), 188-196. doi:10.2307/2505352
dc.relationHayek, F. A., & Pryor, F. L. (1989). The Collected Works of FA Hayek. Vol. 1: The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.
dc.relationHobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, 1651. Menston: Scolar P, 1969. Print.
dc.relationKeynes, J. M. (2018). The General Theory. In The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (pp. 3-3). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
dc.relationKuhn, T. S. (1997). The structure of scientific revolutions. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 33(5), 129-129.
dc.relationLocke, J., & Popple, W. (1955). A letter concerning toleration (p. 18). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
dc.relationMartineau, H. (1832). Illustrations of Political Economy (3rd ed) in 9 vols. (London: Charles Fox, 1832). Vol. 1.
dc.relationMartineau, H. (1837). Society in America: In Two Volumes (Vol. 191). Saunders and Otley
dc.relationMcGlinchey, S., Walters, R., & Scheinpflug, C. (Eds.) (2017). International Relations Theory. E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2017/11/30/beginners-textbook-international-relations-theory/
dc.relationMill, J. S. (1981). JOHN STUART MILL ON LIBERTY, UTILITY, AND RIGHTS. Nomos, 23, 80-116. Retrieved May 11, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24219089
dc.relationPaine, Thomas, 1737-1809. (1975). Thomas Paine's Common sense : the call to independence. Woodbury, N.Y. :Barron's Educational Series, inc.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleAnálisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución