Una aproximación descriptiva a la propiedad intelectual de bajo valor agregado y distorsión de la competencia: Caso Estados Unidos
First descriptive approach on low value added intellectual property and competition distortion: Case of the US
| dc.creator | De La Puente, Mario | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T13:36:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T13:36:35Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3641812 | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga | |
| dc.relation | http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/IUSTITIA/article/view/1545/1234 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Benegas, A. (1999). Apuntes sobre el concepto de copyright. Libertas, 2(29), 121-147. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Buchanan, J. (1986). Los límites de la libertad: Entre la anarquía y el leviatán (pp. 89-91). Barcelona: Liberty Fund. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CDIP. (2011). Interface between exhaustion intellectual property rights and anticopetition law. WIPO Publications. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CDIP. (2011). Report on an analysis of economic/legal literature on intelectual property rights: A barrier to entry? CDIP Publications. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intelectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. Manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research, 4(89), 98. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Constitutional Rights Foundation. (enero, 2011). The origin of patents and copyright law. Washington D.C.: Constitutional Rights Foundation. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cooper, T. (1838). The statutes at large of South Carolina: Acts from 1716 to 1752. A.S. Johnstown: Johnston. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cuban, M. (2013). Lack of innovation as a consequence of law fragility (pp. 23-27). Washington D.C: Brooking Institution. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Denison, E. F. (1979). Accounting for slower economic growth. Brookings Institution. U.S: Washington D.C. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dupree, H. (1986). Science in the Federal Government: A history of policies and activities (p. 43). Washington D.C: The Johns Hopkins University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Foray. (1994). Production and distribution of knowledge in the new systems of innovation: The role of intellectual property rights. STI Review, 14(24), 98-99. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gould, D., y Gruben, W. (1995). El papel de los derechos de la propiedad intelectual en el crecimiento económico. Economía Mexicana Nueva Epoca, 4(2), 23-25. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hayek, F. A. (1948). ‘Free’ enterprise and competitive order. [1947]. En individualism and economic order (pp. 107-108). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hurt, R. M. (1966). The economic rationale of copyright. American Economic Review, 56(134), 421-432. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg. M. (2002). Patents, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McKinsey y Co. (2012). Generating value in generics. McKinsey y Co. Publications. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mochon, A. (2012). Brief history of patents and trademarks in America (pp. 24-25). Pensacola: Brainstorming Pub. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Berlin: Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Patent Act of 1793, Ch. 11, 1 Stat. 318-323 (february 21, 1793). | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Patent Act of 1836, Ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117 (july 4, 1836). | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pérez y Soto, A. (2013). La información secuestrada: El modelo de servidumbre de Thomas Hobbes y su alternativa liberal austriaca en Friedrich August Von Hayek. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pérez y Soto, A., Flores, K. (2013). La patente como límite a la innovación tecnológica. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, 10(2), 107-109. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Plant, [Sir] A. (1974). The economic theory concerning patents for inventions (p. 24). San Diego: Oruro Editions. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Penrose, E. (1974). La economía del Sistema Internacional de Patentes (p. 40). Siglo XXI. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/PWC. (2014). Patent litigation study as case volume leaps: damages continue general decline. Federal Register Monthly Review, 60(109), 12-13. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/PWC Publications. (s.f.). Certain Patents. Selected Economic Essays and Addresses, 34(78), 35-56. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Watson, J. (2013). A history of the United States Patent Office. Official Press C.O. (pp. 123-125). | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/WIPO. (2014). Global innovation index: Who is leading innovation? WIPO Publications. | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2018 IUSTITIA | |
| dc.source | IUSTITIA; Núm. 13 (2015); 311-330 | |
| dc.source | 2539-4657 | |
| dc.source | 1692-9403 | |
| dc.title | Una aproximación descriptiva a la propiedad intelectual de bajo valor agregado y distorsión de la competencia: Caso Estados Unidos | |
| dc.title | First descriptive approach on low value added intellectual property and competition distortion: Case of the US | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |