dc.contributorTorres Celeita, Julián
dc.contributorUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.creatorGonzález Calderón, Mildred Karina
dc.creatorNivia del Toro, María Alejandra
dc.creatorPinto Pérez, Silvia Melissa
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T18:46:07Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T18:46:07Z
dc.date.created2022-01-20T18:46:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-20
dc.identifierGonzález Calderón, M K, Nivia Del Toro, M A y Pinto Pérez S M. (2022).Concordancia en la localización de conductos y variaciones anatómicas radiculares en primer premolar inferior mediante visión directa, microscopio clínico y lupas. [Tesis de Posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bucaramanga, Colombia.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/42459
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The magnification of the visual field in Endodontics is an essential step that allows the realization of more precise diagnoses and treatments, considering the great attention to detail. However, there are elements that can be overlooked during treatment, for this reason, the use of cone beam computed tomography is essential. Objective: To determine the concordance in the localization and location of root canals and anatomical variations found in the cervical third of the selected teeth, using direct vision, magnifying loupes, microscope and cone beam computed tomography as a gold standard. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive observational study, about evaluation of diagnostic technologies, with a sample of 50 natural teeth, first human premolars extracted for non-research purposes, collected during September to December 2020, Zumax 5X magnifying glasses, Dentools MSA clinic microscope and cone beam computed tomography of 0.075mm voxel, analized with Romexis software, brand Planmenca. Results: It was observed that there was a greater concordance with the clinical microscope visualization as the sample was evaluated by the expert researcher, taking into account a kappa value of 0.135. Conclusions: It is concluded that with direct vision there are greater differences in agreement between researchers regardless of their clinical experience; With surgical loupes there is a similar inter-rater agreement, unlike the examination with a clinical microscope, in which experience and the learning curve make the difference. There are more observer similarities when Type I canals are present regardless of the visualization method due to the simplicity of their location and the size of the entrance orifice. In addition, the use of diagnostic aids such as CBCT, represents a complement to the knowledge of anatomy.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherEspecialización Endodoncia
dc.publisherFacultad de Odontología
dc.relationMoradas Estrada M. Importancia de la magnificación en odontología conservadora: revisión bibliográfica. Avances en Odontoestomatología 2017;33(6):283-293.
dc.relationSanchez G, Alegría M, Pesce D, Alcántara R. Localización de conductos radiculares: Visión directa versus microscopio quirúrgico. Estudio in-vitro. Journal of Oral Research 2012;1(1):10-14.
dc.relationIrma Juárez Navarro. Estudio in vivo de la eficacia del uso del microscopio óptico, ultrasonidos y tintes para la localización de conductos de molares en endodonciaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid; 2019.
dc.relationScarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International journal of dentistry 2009;2009.
dc.relationPineda F. Roentgenographic investigation of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology 1973;36(2):253-260.
dc.relationNance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, Trope M. Identification of root canals in molars by tuned‐aperture computed tomography. Int Endod J 2000;33(4):392-396.
dc.relationTareen SUK, Qureshi A, Rehman SU. Frequency and distribution of teeth requiring endodontic treatment in patients attending a free dental camp in Peshawar. 2012;92:345- 9148814.
dc.relationHebling E, Coutinho LA, Ferraz CCR, Cunha FL, Queluz DdP. Periapical status and prevalence of endodontic treatment in institutionalized elderly. Braz Dent J 2014;25(2):123-128.
dc.relationRamamurthy R, Scheetz JP, Clark SJ, Farman AG. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2006;102(6):796-802.
dc.relationCoronel Calle MD, Gavilánez Ledesma JF. Uso de sistemas de magnificación (lupas/microscopio) en la enseñanza en los diferentes Programas de Especialización de Endodoncia de las universidades de la ciudad de Lima. 2020.
dc.relationShetty S, Tejaswi S. Magnification-An endodontic review. Journal of Advanced Clinical and Research Insights 2018;5(6):178-182.
dc.relationSchwarze T, Baethge C, Stecher T, Geurtsen W. Identification of second canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars using magnifying loupes or an operating microscope. Australian Endodontic Journal 2002;28(2):57-60.
dc.relationBaratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod 2009;35(3):337-342.
dc.relationFranco Bautista AS, Gómez Escobar K, Martínez Mayorga M. Valoraciones de los endodoncistas colombianos sobre el uso de la técnica de magnificación en sus prácticas clínicas. 2018.
dc.relationCarr GB, Murgel CA. The use of the operating microscope in endodontics. Dental Clinics 2010;54(2):191-214.
dc.relationMatsumoto T, Nagai T, Ida K, Ito M, Kawai Y, Horiba N, et al. Factors affecting successful prognosis of root canal treatment. J Endod 1987;13(5):239-242.
dc.relationMacri E, Zmener O. Five canals in a mandibular second premolar. J Endod 2000;26(5):304-305.
dc.relationWu M, R'oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2000;89(6):739-743.
dc.relationOrdinola‐Zapata R, Monteiro Bramante C, Gagliardi Minotti P, Cavalini Cavenago B, Gutmann JL, Moldauer BI, et al. Micro‐CT evaluation of C‐shaped mandibular first premolars in a Brazilian subpopulation. Int Endod J 2015;48(8):807-813.
dc.relationFan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: part I—anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30(12):899-903.
dc.relationPérez E. Premolares inferiores con tres conductos. Reporte de dos casos. Acta Odontol Venez 1999:47, 49-51.
dc.relationWolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S. Clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod 2002;28(6):477-479.
dc.relationBaldassari-Cruz LA, Lilly JP, Rivera EM. The influence of dental operating microscope in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2002;93(2):190-194
dc.relationYoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Fukumoto Y, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo. Int Endod J 2005;38(2):124-128.
dc.relationSempira HN, Hartwell GR. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars as determined by use of an operating microscope: a clinical study. J Endod 2000;26(11):673-674.
dc.relationDíaz Gavarrete AA, Arias Ibáñez J. Desórdenes musculoesqueléticos en residentes, docentes, y especialistas de endodoncia en Colombia. 2018.
dc.relationWeine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1969;28(3):419-425.
dc.relationVertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89(2):369-371
dc.relationVertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 1984;58(5):589-599.
dc.relationGutiérrez AH, Rangel CAT, Báez REG, Fernández RGM, Marín EI. Estudio anatómico del sistema de conductos radicular es del segundo premolar inferior mediante la técnica de diafanización dental. Revista Odontológica de Los Andes 2015;10(1):12-16.
dc.relationVertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic topics 2005;10(1):3-29.
dc.relationKenneth M. Hargreaves, Stephen Cohen, Louis H. Berman. Cohen. vías de la pulpa. decima ed. Barcelona (España): Elsevier Mosby; 2011.
dc.relationCarolina Alexandra Aguirre Villagrán. “ANATOMÍA DEL PISO DE CÁMARA: ESTUDIO IN VITRO DEL CUMPLIMIENTO DE LAS LEYES DE LA SIMETRÍA 1-2 EN PRIMEROS MOLARES INFERIORES DE POBLACIÓN ECUATORIANA DIFERENCIADOS EN GÉNERO ENTRE LOS AÑOS 2010-2014”.Quito: UCE; 2015.
dc.relationKrasner P, Rankow HJ. Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. J Endod 2004;30(1):5- 16.
dc.relationAbbott PV. Assessing restored teeth with pulp and periapical diseases for the presence of cracks, caries and marginal breakdown. Aust Dent J 2004;49(1):33-39.
dc.relationBahcall JK, Barss JT. Fiberoptic endoscope usage for intracanal visualization. J Endod 2001;27(2):128-129.
dc.relationCastro JAC, Grisales RF. Anatomía radicular, una mirada desde la micro-cirugía endodóntica: Revisión. CES odontología 2015;28(2):70-99.
dc.relationCleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007;33(5):509-516.
dc.relationZillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1973;36(5):738-744.
dc.relationLu T, Yang S, Pai S. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 2006;32(10):932-936.
dc.relationClarkson RM, Moule AJ. Sodium hypochlorite and its use as an endodontic irrigant. Aust Dent J 1998;43(4):250-256.
dc.relationGoldberg F, Abramovich A. Analysis of the effect of EDTAC on the dentinal walls of the root canal. J Endod 1977;3(3):101-105.
dc.relationŞen BH, Wesselink PR, Türkün M. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 1995;28(3):141-148.
dc.relationEstrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JCE, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002;13(2):113-117.
dc.relationRubinstein R. Magnification and illumination in apical surgery. Endodontic topics 2005;11(1):56-77
dc.relationNageswar Rao R, Nair P. Endodoncia avanzada. : Amolca,; 2011.
dc.relationHuerta HAS, Romero DMR, Hernández, María de Jesús Hernández, Soto COF. Eficacia en la detección del conducto mesiopalatino en primeros molares superiores mediante ojo clínico, lupas 3.5 X y microscopio dental. Oral 2011;12(36):673-678.
dc.relationBowers DJ, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, He J. Magnification's effect on endodontic fine motor skills. J Endod 2010;36(7):1135-1138.
dc.relationBaumann RR. How may the dentist benefit from the operating microscope? Quintessense Int 1977;5:17-18.
dc.relationApotheker H, Jako GJ. A microscope for use in dentistry. Microsurgery 1981;3(1):7- 10.
dc.relationApotheker H. The applications of the dental microscope: preliminary report. Microsurgery 1981;3(2):103-106.
dc.relationSelden HS. The dental-operating microscope and its slow acceptance. J Endod 2002;28(3):206-207.
dc.relationArens DE. Introduction to magnification in endodontics. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry...[et al.] 2003;15(7):426-439.
dc.relationLeonardo Mario LR. Endodoncia: Conceptos Biológicos y Recursos Tecnológicos . Sao Paulo: Editora Artes Medicas; 2009.
dc.relationUniversidad de México. Universidad de México 1930.
dc.relationDávalos PME, da Costa Aznar, Fábio Duarte, Morra DEF. Microscopio operatorio en endodoncia-Revisión de la literatura. Acta odontológica venezolana 2010;48(3):53-54.
dc.relationMerino EM. Endodontic microsurgery. : Quintessence London; 2009.
dc.relationHuang S, Chen N, Yu VSH, Lim HA, Lui J. Long-term Success and Survival of Endodontic Microsurgery. Journal of Endodontics 2020 Feb;46(2):149-157.e4.
dc.relationKim S, Pecora G, Rubinstein RA. The resected root surface and isthmus. Color Atlas of Microsurgery in Endodontics.Philadelphia: Saunders 2001:98-104.
dc.relationNiemczyk SP, DMD. Essentials of Endodontic Microsurgery. Dental Clinics of North America 2010;54(2):375-399.
dc.relationArmas DJN. La microscopía: herramienta para estudiar células y tejidos. Texto Electrónico 2011.
dc.relationKim S, Baek S. The microscope and endodontics. Dental Clinics 2004;48(1):11-18.
dc.relationClark DJ, Sheets CG, Paquette JM. Definitive diagnosis of early enamel and dentinal cracks based on microscopic evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15(7):391-401.
dc.relationLenguas AL, Ortega R, Samara G, López MA. Tomografía computarizada de haz cónico. Aplicaciones clínicas en odontología; comparación con otras técnicas. Cient dent 2010;7(2):147-159.
dc.relationAbella F, Morales K, Garrido I, Pascual J, Duran-Sindreu F, Roig M. Endodontic applications of cone beam computed tomography: Case series and literature review. G Ital Endod 2015;29(2):38-50.
dc.relationNardi C, Calistri L, Pradella S, Desideri I, Lorini C, Colagrande S. Accuracy of orthopantomography for apical periodontitis without endodontic treatment. J Endod 2017;43(10):1640-1646.
dc.relationOser DG, Henson BR, Shiang EY, Finkelman MD, Amato RB. Incidental findings in small field of view cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2017;43(6):901-904.
dc.relationCorrea LR, Spin‐Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira, Heloísa Emília Dias, Wenzel A. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT‐generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross‐sectional images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25(6):690-695.
dc.relationde Ullibarri Galparsoro L, Pita Fernández S. Medidas de concordancia: el índice de Kappa. Cad Aten Primaria 1999;6:169-171.
dc.relationCerda J, Villarroel Del L. Evaluación de la concordancia inter-observador en investigación pediátrica: Coeficiente de Kappa. Revista chilena de pediatría 2008;79(1):54- 58.
dc.relationVeiga de Cabo J, Zimmermann Verdejo M. Modelos de estudios en investigación aplicada: conceptos y criterios para el diseño. Medicina y seguridad del trabajo 2008;54(210):81-88.
dc.relationColombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolucion 8430 de 1993, Octubre 4, por la cual se establecen las normas cientifico tecnicas y administrativas para la investigacion en salud. 1993.
dc.relationDuque TM, Morante DRH, Ferraz CCR, Zaia AA, de Almeida, José Flávio Affonso, de Almeida Gomes, Brenda Paula Figueiredo. Localización efectiva de un segundo conducto radicular en incisivos inferiores mediante magnificación, radiografía y diafanización. Revista Estomatológica Herediana 2013;23(2):57-62.
dc.relationYoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection rate of root canal orifices with a microscope. J Endod 2002;28(6):452-453
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleConcordancia en la localización de conductos y variaciones anatómicas radiculares en primer premolar inferior mediante visión directa, microscopio clínico y lupas.
dc.typebachelor thesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución