dc.creatorCollazos Vesga, Andrea del Pilar
dc.creatorRangel Marín, María Estefanía
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T17:24:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-24T16:08:00Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T17:24:49Z
dc.date.available2017-06-24T16:08:00Z
dc.date.created2017-06-13T17:24:49Z
dc.date.created2017-06-24T16:08:00Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11634/1970
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractThis article search the way in which the adversary proceeding model inspired the law 906 of 2004 and how it has vanished and due to the bad procedures and the wrong interpretation from lawmakers, judges, prosecutors and lawyers. The investigation is focused on the weak points that haven’t permitted to accomplish the achievements in this law. This article studies closely the adversary proceeding principle, the speech, and the equal party opportunity to identify if they are coherent in the practice with the adversary proceeding model. This article takes into account other countries law´s and reports presented by governmental and non-governmental agencies about the advances in the implementation of the new law.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherPregrado Derecho
dc.publisherFacultad de Derecho
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleAplicación de la ley 906 de 2004: la desnaturalización del modelo acusatorio.
dc.typebachelor thesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución