dc.contributorGarcía Dusaán, Éder
dc.creatorÁvila Robles, Martha Patricia
dc.creatorCruz Romero, Carolina
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-16T18:25:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-24T17:29:15Z
dc.date.available2017-06-16T18:25:53Z
dc.date.available2017-06-24T17:29:15Z
dc.date.created2017-06-16T18:25:53Z
dc.date.created2017-06-24T17:29:15Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11634/2689
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractThis research, the first about the subject in the Education Masters program at the University San Tomas, emerged as a need for the researchers to specify the argument categories used by professors and students in the interpersonal conflict resolution scenarios that they are faced with. Therefore, the following are the main argument categories: parties, subject matter, rationale, purpose and resolution techniques used. Methodologically this research was conducted using the participant’s observation strategy and developing the argument categories as categories for analysis. The findings showed that while professors used the regulation as their essential reasoning, students appeal to emotions as the foundation of their logic.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherMaestría Educación
dc.publisherMaestría en Educación
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleLa argumentación presente en procesos de resolución de conflictos
dc.typemaster thesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución