Sustainability science, its methodological characteristics and reach in decision-making processes
Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones;
Ciência da sustentabilidade, suas características metodológicas e alcance nos processos de tomada de decisão
dc.creator | Salas-Zapata, Walter Alfredo | |
dc.creator | Ríos-Osorio, Leonardo Alberto | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-08T21:22:14Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T12:04:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-08T21:22:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T12:04:05Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-11-08T21:22:14Z | |
dc.identifier | https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/29572 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3623518 | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, UNAD | |
dc.relation | http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/index.php/riaa/article/view/987/973 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Almeida, C., & Bascolo, E. (2006). Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 22: (S7-19) (S20-33). | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. J. C. C. F. Berkes (Ed.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Boulanger, P., & Brechet, T. (2005). Models for policymaking in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecological Economics, 55(3): 337-350. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS, 100 (14): 8059 - 8061. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Espinosa, A., Harnden, R., & Walker, J. (2008). A complexity approach to sustainability – Stafford Beer revisited. European Journal Of Operational Research, 187 (2): 636-651. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Fafard, P. (2008). Evidence and Healthy Public Policy: Insights from Health and Political Sciences (Vol. Mayo). Quebec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 2 (2): 14 - 21. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems. Global Environ Chang, 16 (3): 253 - 267. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the postnormal age. Futures, 25 (7): 739-755. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Gallopin, G. (2004). Sustainable development: epistemological challenges to science and technology. Paper presented at the Workshop on Sustainable Development: Epistemological Challenges to Science and Technology, Santiago de Chile. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Gallopín, G. (2001, December). Science and technology, sustainability and sustainable development. (LC/R.2081/I). ECLAC. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Gómez-Arias, R., Orozco, D., Rodríguez, F., & Velasquez, W. (2006). Políticas públicas en salud: relación entre investigación y decisión. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública, 24 (2): 105-118. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Grosskurth, J. (2007). Ambition and reality in modeling: a case study on public planning for regional sustainability. Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 3 (1): 3-11. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., & Nykvist, B. (2009). Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process. Environment and Planning, 41 (5): 1185-1200. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Hirsch, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60 (1): 119-128. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Holling, C. (1996). Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystem, and incentives for people. Ecol Appl, 3: 733-735. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Holling, C. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4: 390 - 405. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3 (2): 215-239. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., . . . Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517): 641-642. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 3 (2): 5-14. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1 (1): 1-6. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Luks, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological Economics, 63 (2-3): 418-426. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 2 (1): 36 - 41. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). Los límites del crecimiento (Vol. Primera). Nueva York: Fondo de Cultura Económica. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. (2008). Introduction. In J. Norberg & G. Cumming (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 1-14). New York: Columbia University Press. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Novo, M. (2006). El desarrollo sostenible. Su dimensión ambiental y educativa (First ed.). Madrid: Pearson-Prentice Hall. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecolhealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2 (1): 77-84. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions toward sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3 (4): 275 - 284. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Rios, L., Ortiz, M., & Álvarez, X. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16 (1): 48-60. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Torgerson, D. (2003). Entre el conocimiento y la política: tres caras del análisis de política [1986]. In L. Aguilar (Ed.), El estudio de las políticas (pp. 197-238). México D.F.: Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa | |
dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2013 Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental (RIAA) | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es | |
dc.source | Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental; Vol. 4, Núm. 1 (2013); 101-111 | |
dc.source | Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental; Vol. 4, Núm. 1 (2013); 101-111 | |
dc.source | 2145-6453 | |
dc.source | 2145-6097 | |
dc.subject | methodology; participation; policies; sustainability; transdisciplinarity. | |
dc.subject | metodología; participación; políticas; sostenibilidad; transdisciplinariedad. | |
dc.subject | metodologia; participacao; politica; sustentabilidade; transdisciplinaridade. | |
dc.title | Sustainability science, its methodological characteristics and reach in decision-making processes | |
dc.title | Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones | |
dc.title | Ciência da sustentabilidade, suas características metodológicas e alcance nos processos de tomada de decisão | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |