Artículo de revista
Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial
Date
2019-07-13Author
Gerstein, Hertzel C.
Colhoun, Helen M.
Dagenais, Gilles R.
Diaz, Rafael
Lakshmanan, Mark
Pais, Prem
Probstfield, Jeffrey
Riesmeyer, Jeffrey S.
Riddle, Matthew C.
Rydén, Lars
Xavier, Denis
Messan Atisso, Charles
Dyal, Leanne
Hall, Stephanie
Rao-Melacini, Purnima
Wong, Gloria
Avezum, Alvaro
Basile, Jan
Chung, Namsik
Conget, Ignacio
Cushman, William C.
Franek, Edward
Hancu, Nicolae
Hanefeld, Markolf
Holt, Shaun
Jansky, Petr
Keltai, Matyas Matyas
Lanas, Fernando
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Lopez-Jaramillo, Patricio
Cardona-Munoz, Ernesto German
Pirags, Valdis
Pogosova, Nana
Raubenheimer, Peter J.
Shaw, Jonathan E.
Sheu, Wayne H-H.
Temelkova-Kurktschiev, Theodora
The REWIND Investigators
Institutions
Abstract
Background
Three different glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists reduce cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk with high glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentrations. We assessed the effect of the GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events when added to the existing antihyperglycaemic regimens of individuals with type 2 diabetes with and without previous cardiovascular disease and a wide range of glycaemic control.
Methods
This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women aged at least 50 years with type 2 diabetes who had either a previous cardiovascular event or cardiovascular risk factors were randomly assigned (1:1) to either weekly subcutaneous injection of dulaglutide (1·5 mg) or placebo. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random code with stratification by site. All investigators and participants were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were followed up at least every 6 months for incident cardiovascular and other serious clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of the composite endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (including unknown causes), which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01394952.
Findings
Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, 9901 participants (mean age 66·2 years [SD 6·5], median HbA1c 7·2% [IQR 6·6–8·1], 4589 [46·3%] women) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dulaglutide (n=4949) or placebo (n=4952). During a median follow-up of 5·4 years (IQR 5·1–5·9), the primary composite outcome occurred in 594 (12·0%) participants at an incidence rate of 2·4 per 100 person-years in the dulaglutide group and in 663 (13·4%) participants at an incidence rate of 2·7 per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·88, 95% CI 0·79–0·99; p=0·026). All-cause mortality did not differ between groups (536 [10·8%] in the dulaglutide group vs 592 [12·0%] in the placebo group; HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·80–1·01; p=0·067). 2347 (47·4%) participants assigned to dulaglutide reported a gastrointestinal adverse event during follow-up compared with 1687 (34·1%) participants assigned to placebo (p<0·0001).
Interpretation
Dulaglutide could be considered for the management of glycaemic control in middle-aged and older people with type 2 diabetes with either previous cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors.