Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea

dc.creatorRodríguez, Laritza
dc.creatorMiranda, Angel David
dc.creatorGonzález G., Hector A.
dc.date.accessioned2000-06-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T12:42:35Z
dc.date.available2000-06-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T12:42:35Z
dc.date.created2000-06-01 00:00:00
dc.date.created2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2000-06-01
dc.identifier10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.identifier0121-7372
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2144
dc.identifier2462-991X
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3596657
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherSociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
dc.relationCunningham, Mac Donald, Gant Leveno. William's Obstetrics; 41 edición. Masson S.A., Barcelona, España, 585 -90.
dc.relationHauth JC, Owen J. Transverse Uterine Incision Closure : One versus two layer. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct; 167(4): 1108-11.
dc.relationFederici D, Lacelly B. Cesarean Section using the Misgay Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57(3): 273- 79.
dc.relationAlonso P Walker. Peritoneo Peritonitis y Abscesos Intraabdominales En: Schwars Principios de Cirugía General. Editorial MGH; 1303- 1307.
dc.relationEllis H & Reddle R. Does the Peritoneum to be closed at laparotomy. Brit J Surg, 1 1977; 164: 733-6.
dc.relationSanders, DiClementi. Principies of abdominal wound closure II. Prevention ofwounddehiscence. Arch Surg. 1997; 112(10): 1188-91.
dc.relationHull DB, Varner NW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery, Obst Gynecol 1991; 77(6): 818- 21.
dc.relationPietrantoni M, -Parsons MT, O'Brien WF, Collins E, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2):293-6.
dc.relationNagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(4):1366-70.
dc.relationMcNally O. Does closure of the peritoneum duringZesarean section influence postoperative morbidity and subsequent bladder adhesion. J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.
dc.relationStark M. Technique of caesarean section: The Misgay Ladach method. Women's Health Today. XIV World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Montreal. September 1994. si - 85.
dc.relationHojberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ . Closure versus non -closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Evaluation of pain. A randomized study . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77 ( 7): 741-5.
dc.relationChapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: (1)16-8.
dc.relationTucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgins P, Owen J, Winkler JL. Trial of labor after a one or two layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 545-6.
dc.relationObel J, Younis JS, Lang N, Levit A. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routline cesarean sections? J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 5(6): 366-9.
dc.relationKaripineni RC, Wilk PJ, Danese CA. The role of the peritoneum in the healing of abdominal incisions. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1976; 142(5): 729-30.
dc.relationIrion O, Luzuy F, Beguin E Nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul; 103(7): 690-4.
dc.relationPridjian G, Hibbard JU, Moawad AH. Cesarean: Changing the trends. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2): 195-200.
dc.relationhttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/229/228
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2000 : Enero – Junio
dc.relation38
dc.relation1
dc.relation34
dc.relation9
dc.relationRevista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/229
dc.titleComparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeJournal article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución