dc.creator | Reyna Villasmil, Eduardo | |
dc.creator | Mejia-Montilla, Jorly | |
dc.creator | Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia | |
dc.creator | Torres-Cepeda, Duly | |
dc.creator | Fernández-Ramírez , Andreina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-06 16:33:03 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-29T19:38:28Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-27T12:37:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-06 16:33:03 | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-29T19:38:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-27T12:37:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-04-06 16:33:03 | |
dc.date.created | 2022-06-29T19:38:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-06 | |
dc.identifier | 0121-7372 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2975 | |
dc.identifier | 2462-991X | |
dc.identifier | https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/1039 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3596051 | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud | |
dc.relation | Romli R, Shahabudin S, Saddki N, Mokhtar N. Cervical cancer and pap smear screening: knowledge, attitude and practice among working women in northern state of Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2019;74(1):8-14. | |
dc.relation | Alwahaibi N, Alsalami W, Alramadhani N, Alzaabi A. Factors influencing knowledge and practice regarding cervical cancer and pap smear testing among Omani women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(12):3367-3374. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3367 | |
dc.relation | Rahnama P, Faghihzadeh S, Ziaei S. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(1):66-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2005.14412.x | |
dc.relation | Rocha VSO, Malfacini SDS, Gomes AM, Rocha CRMD. External quality monitoring of the cervical cytopathological exams in the Rio de Janeiro City. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(6):338-346. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1657755. | |
dc.relation | Moore D, Pugh-Cain D, Walker T. Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate. Cytopathology. 2009;20(3):161-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00605.x. | |
dc.relation | Redmond M, Ockochinski L, Kay E, Nixon S, McBrearty P, Leader M, Grace A. The difficulty with audit of high-grade cervical cytology in the absence of a national screening programme. Ir Med J. 2008;101(6):175-7. | |
dc.relation | Cernescu EC, Anton G, Ruţă S, Cernescu C. The effectiveness of cytological rescreening in the reduction of false negative/positive Pap reports. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2013;72(2):93-104. | |
dc.relation | Rebolj M, Rask J, van Ballegooijen M, Kirschner B, Rozemeijer K, Bonde J, Rygaard C, Lynge E. Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(9):1259-74. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339. | |
dc.relation | Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, Khoo US, Ng AW. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer. 2003;99(6):331-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11786 | |
dc.relation | Parnpoonsarp W, Ploarsa P, Arpakorn V. Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92 Suppl 3:S9-14. | |
dc.relation | Rowe LR, Marshall CJ, Berry M, Larson MA, Bentz JS. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears. Acta Cytol. 2003;47(4):602-4. doi: 10.1159/000326575 | |
dc.relation | Abdali K, Soleimani M, Khajehei M, Tabatabaee HR, Komar PV, Montazer NR. Comparison of Pap smear quality with anatomical spatula and convenience (spatula-cytobrush) methods: a single blind clinical trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(6):1769-72. | |
dc.relation | Ivanov S. Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2007;46(8):26-7. | |
dc.relation | Uyar DS, Eltabbakh GH, Mount SL. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(02)00102-6 | |
dc.relation | Randolph ML, Wu HH, Crabtree WN. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep papanicolaou tests using a modified SurePath preparation technique. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(5):343-8. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21408 | |
dc.relation | Longatto Filho A, Pereira SM, Di Loreto C, Utagawa ML, Makabe S, Sakamoto Maeda MY, Marques JA, Santoro CL, Castelo A. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(2):497-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.013 | |
dc.relation | Mayeaux EJ Jr, Novetsky AP, Chelmow D, Garcia F, Choma K, Liu AH, et al. ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Colposcopy Quality Improvement Recommendations for the United States. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(4):242-248. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000342. | |
dc.relation | Pandey D, Shetty J, Sambhaji C, Saxena PU, Mishra D, Chawla A. Cervical Cancer as a silent killer: A rare case report with review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015;11(3):653. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.137997. | |
dc.relation | Kotaska AJ, Matisic JP. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality. CMAJ. 2003;169(7):666-9. | |
dc.relation | Kavoussi SK, Smith YR, Ernst SD, Quint EH. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(1):115-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0795. | |
dc.relation | Gupta N, Bhar VS, Rajwanshi A, Suri V. Unsatisfactory rate in liquid-based cervical samples as compared to conventional smears: A study from tertiary care hospital. Cytojournal. 2016;13:14. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.183831. | |
dc.relation | https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/1039/1744 | |
dc.relation | : Pre-Print | |
dc.relation | Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights | Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía - 2021 | |
dc.source | https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/1039 | |
dc.subject | citología de cuello uterino | |
dc.subject | suficiencia | |
dc.subject | interpretación | |
dc.subject | cáncer de cuello uterino | |
dc.subject | factores | |
dc.subject | uterine cervix cytology | |
dc.subject | sufficiency | |
dc.subject | interpretation | |
dc.subject | uterine cervix cancer | |
dc.subject | factors | |
dc.title | Factores que afectan la suficiencia e interpretación de la citología de cuello uterino | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |
dc.type | Journal article | |