dc.contributorcacosta7@eafit.edu.co
dc.contributorUniversidad de Chicago
dc.contributorUniversidad EAFIT
dc.contributorUniversidad de los Andes
dc.creatorZorro Medina, Angela
dc.creatorAcosta, Camilo
dc.creatorMejía, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-10T16:32:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-10T16:32:58Z
dc.date.created2020-09-10T16:32:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-10
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/17722
dc.identifierK14
dc.identifierK40
dc.identifierK42
dc.description.abstractDuring the 1990s, Latin America experienced a criminal procedural revolution (LACPR) when approximately 70% of its countries abandoned their inquisitorial system and adopted the U.S. adversarial model. Following the LACPR, the region experienced a dramatic increase in crime, consolidating it as one of the most violent areas in the world. Despite previous empirical evidence indicating that procedural law affects criminal behavior, the effects of the LACPR continue highly unexplored. In this paper, we use the Latin American case to evaluate the impact of an adversarial reform on crime rates. Exploiting the quasi-experimental implementation of the reform in Colombia, we use an event study approach combined with differences-in-differences to estimate the reform’s effects on criminal activity. Despite the opposite incentives the reform created, we find an increase associated with the procedural transformation in overall crime rates (22%), violent crime (15%), and property crime (8%). We also observe a dramatic decrease in drug offenses associated with lower arrest rates. Our findings contribute to the literature on Latin American crime and the link between procedural law and criminal behavior.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherEscuela de Economía y Finanzas
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.titleThe Unintended Consequences of the U.S. Adversarial Model in Latin American Crime
dc.typeworkingPaper
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución