dc.contributorted.breton@gmail.com
dc.creatorBreton, Theodore R.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-30T21:38:04Z
dc.date.available2014-05-30T21:38:04Z
dc.date.created2014-05-30T21:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-19
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/2438
dc.identifierF43
dc.identifierI21
dc.identifierO11
dc.identifierO15
dc.description.abstractThis paper challenges Hanushek and Woessmann’s [2008] contention that the quality and not the quantity of schooling determines a nation’s rate of economic growth. I first show that their statistical analysis is flawed. I then show that when a nation’s average test scores and average schooling attainment are included in a national income model, both measures explain income differences, but schooling attainment has greater statistical significance. The high correlation between a nation’s average schooling attainment, cumulative investment in schooling, and average tests scores indicates that average schooling attainment implicitly measures the quality as well as the quantity of schooling.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherEscuela de Economía y Finanzas
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.titleThe Quality vs. the Quantity of Schooling: What Drives Economic Growth?
dc.typeworkingPaper
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución