dc.contributorstobonz@eafit.edu.co
dc.creatorTobón Zapata, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T14:48:38Z
dc.date.available2020-03-03T14:48:38Z
dc.date.created2020-03-03T14:48:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-26
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/15901
dc.identifierD04
dc.identifierH41
dc.identifierJ24
dc.identifierK14
dc.identifierK42
dc.description.abstractFrom the US to Colombia, from India to Uganda, many inmates suffer from underprovision of services such as surveillance or rehabilitation in overcrowded prisons. Yet, we know little about how prison quality affects long-term inmate outcomes. I study a prison construction program in Colombia and find t hat q uasi-random assignment of inmates to less crowded, and higher service facilities reduced recidivism. Criminal capital is an important mechanism. Less crowded and better service facilities are associated with a lower level of unsupervised criminal contact within prisons. The program led to substantial welfare gains, even when assuming a low social cost per crime.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherEscuela de Economía y Finanzas
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.titleDo better prisons reduce recidivism? Evidence from a prison construction program
dc.typeworkingPaper
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución