dc.creatorFutoma, Joseph
dc.creatorSimons, Morgan
dc.creatorPanch, Trishan
dc.creatorDoshi-Velez, Finale
dc.creatorCeli, Leo Anthony
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T17:20:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:51:35Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T17:20:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:51:35Z
dc.date.created2020-08-25T17:20:12Z
dc.identifier0140-6736
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/12226
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3508691
dc.description.abstractDr Lee, an esteemed intensivist from the USA, is rounding in an intensive care unit (ICU). He is asked by a team member who is taking care of patients with COVID-19 if they can triage their patients to optimise use of scarce resources, such as ventilators, with their hospital’s new machine learning model to predict mortality.1 He is about to say yes, but stops himself. Do the findings of the preprints and fast-tracked published articles that this model is based on apply to his patient population?2 Problems with the increase in hastily written articles notwithstanding, are the conclusions of research based on patients with COVID-19 in China and Italy from several months ago still valid in his ICU today, given the differences in practice patterns and rapidly changing guidelines and protocols?
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherThe Lancet
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectClinical research
dc.subjectHealth care
dc.subjectGeneralisability
dc.titleThe myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución