Managing socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes for sustainable communities in Asia : mapping and navigating stakeholders, policy and action
Autor
Saito, Osamu
Subramanian, Suneetha M
Hashimoto, Shizuka
Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
Institución
Resumen
Core research agendas for sustainability science include the following: (1) codesigning future scenarios and visions with a participatory approach, (2) integrating
indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems into both scientific knowledge and
future scenarios, and (3) the formulation of actions to transform society toward a
more sustainable future (Miller et al. 2014; Schneider and Rist 2014; Kishita et al.
2016; Saito 2017).
In 2016, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
(IPBES) approved a methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of
biodiversity and ecosystem services. This report guides experts, stakeholders, and
policy makers regarding the use of scenarios and models to perform assessments
within IPBES. In this assessment report, “Scenarios” are defined as representations
of possible futures for one or more components of a system. In this case, this is
achieved with particular emphasis on drivers of change in nature and natural
resources, including alternative policy or management options.
While IPBES has identified the development of scenarios as a key to aid decisionmakers in identifying potential impacts of different policy options, it currently lacks
studies on substantial long-term-scenario approaches (Kok et al. 2017). IPBES
emphasizes the importance of ILK together with the social–ecological dynamics of
biodiversity and ecosystem services; therefore, engaging with the substantial diversity of local contexts through participatory processes is essential.
To meet this challenge, the authors launched a new project in 2016 named
“Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Service (PANCES)”
which has been funded by Japan’s Ministry of the Environment. The aim of this
project is to develop an integrated assessment model of social–ecological systems
to predict and assess natural and socio-economic values of natural capital and ecosystem services in Japan under various future scenarios (including differing socioeconomic conditions and policy options) (PANCES website: http://pances.net/top/).
PANCES also promotes multilevel governance of natural capital to maintain and
improve “inclusive well-being” and to demonstrate the integrated assessment model
at both national and local scales in Japan and beyond.