Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by COVID-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage
Autor
De Nardo, Pasquale
Gentilotti, Elisa
Mazzaferri, Fulvia
Cremonini, Eleonora
Hansen, Paul
Goossens, Herman
Tacconelli, Evelina
Institución
Resumen
Objective: To use Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to determine weights for eleven
criteria in order to prioritize COVID-19 non-critical patients for admission to hospital in
healthcare settings with limited resources.
Methods: The MCDA was applied in two main steps: specification of criteria for prioritizing
COVID-19 patients (and levels within each criterion); and determination of weights for the
criteria based on experts’ knowledge and experience in managing COVID-19 patients, via an
online survey. Criteria were selected based on available COVID-19 evidence with a focus on
low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Results: The most important criteria (mean weights, summing to 100%), are: PaO2 (16.3%);
peripheral O2 saturation (15.9%); chest X-ray (14.1%); Modified Early Warning ScoreMEWS (11.4%); respiratory rate (9.5%); comorbidities (6.5%); living with vulnerable people
(6.4%); body mass index (5.6%); duration of symptoms before hospital evaluation (5.4%);
CRP (5.1%); and age (3.8%).
Conclusions: At the beginning of a new pandemic, when evidence for disease predictors is
limited or unavailable and effective national contingency plans are difficult to establish, the MCDA prioritization model could play a pivotal role in improving the response of health
systems.