dc.creatorMalherbe, Petrus
dc.creatorSmit, Pierre
dc.creatorSharma, Kartik
dc.creatorMcCaul, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T17:22:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:42:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T17:22:43Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:42:17Z
dc.date.created2020-10-06T17:22:43Z
dc.identifier2211-419X
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.08.005
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/14260
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.08.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3505888
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Prehospital care is integral in addressing sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) high injury and illness burden. Consequently, robust, high-quality prehospital guidance documents are needed to inform care. These guidance documents include, but are not limited to, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), protocols and algorithms that are contextually appropriate for SSA. However, SSA prehospital guidance mostly originates from the ‘Global North,’ with limited guidance for Africa by Africans. To strengthen prehospital clinical practice in SSA, we described and appraised all prehospital SSA guidance documents informing clinical decision making. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of prehospital-relevant guidance documents, including CPGs, algorithms, protocols and position statements originating from SSA. We performed a comprehensive literature search in various databases (PUBMED and SCOPUS), guideline clearing houses (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Trip, and Guidelines International Network), journals, various forms of grey literature and contacted experts. Guidance document screening and data extraction was done independently, in duplicate and reviewed by a third author. Guidance quality was then determined using the AGREE II tool and data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Results: We included 51 guidance documents from 13 countries across SSA after screening 2320 potential documents. The majority of guidance documents lacked an evidence foundation, made recommendations based on expert input, and were predominantly end-user presentations such as algorithms or protocols. Overall, reporting quality was poor, specifically for critical domains such as rigour of development; however, clarity of presentation was generally strong. Guidance topics were focused around resuscitation and common diseases (both communicable and non-communicable) with major gaps identified across a variety of topics; such as mental health for example. Conclusion: The majority of prehospital clinical guidance from SSA provides clinicians with excellent ready to use end-user material. Conversely, most of the guidance documents lack an appropriate evidence foundation and fail to transparently report the guidance development process, highlighting the need to strengthen and build guideline development capacity to promote the transition from eminence-based to evidence-based guidance for prehospital care in SSA. Guideline developers, professional societies and publishers need to be aware of international and local guidance document development and reporting standards in order to produce guidance we can trust.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAfrican Journal of Emergency Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectEmergency care
dc.subjectPrehospital
dc.subjectGuideline development
dc.subjectScoping review
dc.subjectGuideline quality
dc.titleGuidance we can trust? The status and quality of prehospital clinical guidance in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución