dc.creatorHastie, Claire E.
dc.creatorMackay, Daniel F.
dc.creatorHo, Frederick
dc.creatorCelis-Morales, Carlos A.
dc.creatorVittal Katikireddi, Srinivasa
dc.creatorNiedzwiedz, Claire L.
dc.creatorJani, Bhautesh D.
dc.creatorWelsh, Paul
dc.creatorMair, Frances S.
dc.creatorGray, Stuart R.
dc.creatorO’Donnell, Catherine A.
dc.creatorGill, Jason MR.
dc.creatorSattar, Naveed
dc.creatorPell, Jill P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T17:12:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:40:16Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T17:12:32Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:40:16Z
dc.date.created2020-07-10T17:12:32Z
dc.identifier1871-4021
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.050
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/10401
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.050
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3505256
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: COVID-19 and low levels of vitamin D appear to disproportionately affect black and minority ethnic individuals. We aimed to establish whether blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was associated with COVID-19 risk, and whether it explained the higher incidence of COVID-19 in black and South Asian people. Methods: UK Biobank recruited 502,624 participants aged 37e73 years between 2006 and 2010. Baseline exposure data, including 25(OH)D concentration and ethnicity, were linked to COVID-19 test results. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between 25(OH)D and confirmed COVID-19, and the association between ethnicity and both 25(OH)D and COVID19. Results: Complete data were available for 348,598 UK Biobank participants. Of these, 449 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Vitamin D was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (OR ¼ 0.99; 95% CI 0.99e0.999; p ¼ 0.013), but not after adjustment for confounders (OR ¼ 1.00; 95% CI ¼ 0.998e1.01; p ¼ 0.208). Ethnicity was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (blacks versus whites OR ¼ 5.32, 95% CI ¼ 3.68e7.70, p-value<0.001; South Asians versus whites OR ¼ 2.65, 95% CI ¼ 1.65 e4.25, p-value<0.001). Adjustment for 25(OH)D concentration made little difference to the magnitude of the association. Conclusions: Our findings do not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection, nor that vitamin D concentration may explain ethnic differences in COVID-19 infection.
dc.publisherScience Direct
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectVitamin D
dc.subjectEthnicity
dc.titleVitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución