dc.creatorSingh, Aminder A
dc.creatorBoyle, Jonathan R
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T14:08:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:37:50Z
dc.date.available2020-09-07T14:08:40Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:37:50Z
dc.date.created2020-09-07T14:08:40Z
dc.identifier0039-6060
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2020.07.010
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/12800
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2020.07.010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3504491
dc.description.abstractDefining and maintaining quality is essential to surgical practice. It is only through structured approaches to assessing outcomes that we can ensure that optimal care is delivered. This article will define quality in healthcare and discuss assessment models with reference to pertinent surgical literature. National initiatives are discussed with a critical appraisal of their role and effectiveness. We discuss the aim of quality improvement initiatives and comment on reporting of outcomes. The difficult question of how to maintain quality during a crisis, such as an infectious disease pandemic, is addressed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSurgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsAcceso restringido
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectCase mix
dc.subjectCovid-19
dc.subjectDonabedian model
dc.subjectHealthcare
dc.subjectOutliers
dc.subjectPatient reported outcomes measures
dc.subjectQuality
dc.titleEvaluating quality in clinical care


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución