dc.creatorHaramoto, Eiji
dc.creatorMalla, Bikash
dc.creatorThakali, Ocean
dc.creatorKitajima, Masaaki
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-14T14:56:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:25:17Z
dc.date.available2020-07-14T14:56:43Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:25:17Z
dc.date.created2020-07-14T14:56:43Z
dc.identifier0048-9697
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140405
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/10477
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140405
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3500554
dc.description.abstractWastewater-based epidemiology is a powerful tool to understand the actual incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a community because severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of COVID-19, can be shed in the feces of infected individuals regardless of their symptoms. The present study aimed to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater and river water in Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan, using four quantitative and two nested PCR assays. Influent and secondary-treated (before chlorination) wastewater samples and river water samples were collected five times from a wastewater treatment plant and three times from a river, respectively, between March 17 and May 7, 2020. The wastewater and river water samples (200–5000 mL) were processed by using two different methods: the electronegative membrane-vortex (EMV) method and the membrane adsorption-direct RNA extraction method. Based on the observed concentrations of indigenous pepper mild mottle virus RNA, the EMV method was found superior to the membrane adsorption-direct RNA extraction method. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was successfully detected in one of five secondary-treated wastewater samples with a concentration of 2.4 × 103 copies/L by N_Sarbeco qPCR assay following the EMV method, with sequence confirmation of the qPCR product, whereas all the influent samples were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. This result could be attributed to higher limit of detection for influent (4.0 × 103 –8.2 × 104 copies/L) with a lower filtration volume (200 mL) compared to that for secondary-treated wastewater (1.4 × 102 –2.5 × 103 copies/L) with a higher filtration volume of 5000 mL. None of the river water samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Comparison with the reported COVID-19 cases in Yamanashi Prefecture showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the secondary-treated wastewater sample when the cases peaked in the community. This is the first study reporting the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater in Japan.
dc.publisherScience Direct
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectRiver water
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectWastewater
dc.subjectWastewater-based epidemiology
dc.titleFirst environmental surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater and river water in Japan


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución