dc.creator | Wellinghausen, Nele | |
dc.creator | Plonné, Dietmar | |
dc.creator | Voss, Meike | |
dc.creator | Ivanova, Ralitsa | |
dc.creator | Frodl, Reinhard | |
dc.creator | Deininger, Susanne | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-24T16:11:55Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-23T18:07:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-24T16:11:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-23T18:07:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-24T16:11:55Z | |
dc.identifier | 1386-6532 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104542 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/11094 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104542 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3495721 | |
dc.description.abstract | Commercially available immunoassays have been developed for sensitive and specific detection of antibodies
against SARS-CoV-2. While a fast and reliable IgG response has been reported for samples from hospitalized
COVID-19 patients, less is known about ambulatory patients. We evaluated the SARS-CoV-2-IgG response by the
Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA IgG (Euroimmun) in a defined cohort of SARS-CoV-2-PCR-confirmed outpatients and
asymptomatic contact persons including 137 serum samples from PCR-confirmed outpatients (n = 111) and
asymptomatic but PCR-positive contact persons (n = 26) sent to our laboratory as part of routine diagnostics for
determination of SARS-CoV-2-IgG. Overall positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2-IgG was 81.1 % in outpatients (irrespective of sampling before or after day 21 after onset of symptoms) but significantly lower in asymptomatic
contact persons (15.4 %, p < 0.0001). In contact persons without symptoms the ct values of the PCR assays were
significantly higher (5–7 threshold cycles) than in outpatients, and ct values were significantly negative correlated to the SARS-CoV-2-IgG ratio, suggesting a lower viral load as a possible explanation for lower rate of
seropositivity. In summary, our study shows that serological response to SARS-CoV-2 in outpatients including
asymptomatic persons is less pronounced than in hospitalized patients. Further controlled studies are urgently
needed to determine serological response in outpatients and asymptomatic persons since this is the main target
population for seroepidemiological investigations. | |
dc.publisher | Journal of clinical virology | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.source | reponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL | |
dc.source | instname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano | |
dc.subject | SARS-CoV-2-IgG | |
dc.subject | Outpatients | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.subject | Contact persons | |
dc.subject | Ct values | |
dc.title | SARS-CoV-2-IgG response is different in COVID-19 outpatients and asymptomatic contact persons | |