dc.creatorConnelly, Arlene
dc.creatorSerpell, Mick
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T19:22:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T18:05:01Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T19:22:49Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T18:05:01Z
dc.date.created2020-09-01T19:22:49Z
dc.identifier1472-0299
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/12564
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3494745
dc.description.abstractClinical negligence may be tried under the civil or criminal legal system. Any General Medical Council proceedings are conducted separately. All cost time and money, and may be stressful for the patient and clinicians involved. In order to prove negligence, the claimant must prove the clinician had a duty of care, there was breach of that duty, and that breach caused injury. Interpretation of the law evolves as cases are heard in court and precedents are set. It is important for clinicians to keep up to date with developments in their specialty and good medical practice guidelines.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAnaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsAcceso restringido
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
dc.subjectBawa-Garba
dc.subjectDuty of care
dc.subjectIndemnity
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectMontgomery ruling
dc.subjectNegligence
dc.subjectShared decision making
dc.titleClinical negligence


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución