Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.

dc.contributorLópez Vargas, Omar
dc.creatorFajardo Ríos, Joan David
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-18T18:59:36Z
dc.date.available2020-08-18T18:59:36Z
dc.date.created2020-08-18T18:59:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierTE-24135
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12361
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifierreponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN
dc.identifierrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractEl trabajo de grado se propone hacer un análisis estadístico y sistemático de ambientes computacionales los cuales tienen como objetivo desarrollar habilidades en diferentes dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje en los estudiantes como lo son; autorregulación, aprendizaje autorregulado, estilos de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo, estas dimensiones mencionadas anteriormente son evaluadas mediante un programa estadístico spss con datos recogidos previamente de una investigación realizada en el año 2010 en un colegio público de Bogotá y otra realizada para hacer una validación de un cuestionario “Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire”, para estudiantes colombianos. Gracias a los datos recogidos se puede hacer una discusión de resultados en el cual se menciona la manera en que influyo cada uno de estos instrumentos en los estudiantes en relación con las dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje mencionadas anteriormente.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.publisherLicenciatura en Diseño Tecnológico
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
dc.relationAngeli, C., Valanides, N. & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior. No 25, pp. 1355–1366.
dc.relationAlexander P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relationAlonso, C. M., Gallego, D. J. & Honey, P. (2000). Los estilos de aprendizaje: procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Mensajero. 5ª edición
dc.relationAltun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 289-297
dc.relationAmes, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261-271
dc.relationArmstrong, A. M. (1989). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 154-166.
dc.relationArmstrong, S. J. & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 283–312
dc.relationAron, A. & Aron E.N. (2001). Estadística para psicología. Prentice Hall, Pearson Educaciòn. Sao Pablo – Brasil
dc.relationAustin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin,120(3), 338-375
dc.relationAyersman, D.J. & von Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior (Special issue on Hypermedia: Theory, research, and application), 11, 371-390
dc.relationAzevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197.
dc.relationAzevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.
dc.relationAzevedo, R. Cromley, J.G., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003). The role of co-regulated learning during students’ understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Paper to be presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., Wang, H., & Mulhern, J. (2001). Do different instructional interventions facilitated students´ ability to shift to more sophisticated mental models of complex systems?. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, W.A.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., y Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87–111
dc.relationAzevedo, R., Moos, D., Greene, J., Winters, F. & Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Education Tech Research, 56:45–72.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., Verona, M.E., & Cromley, J.G. (2001). Fostering students` Collaborative problema solving with RiverWeb. In J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield, & W.L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (pp. 166-175).
dc.relationBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1989). The perceived controllability and performance standards on selfregulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 805-814
dc.relationBandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148
dc.relationBeers, P. J. (2005). Negotiating common ground: Tools for multidisciplinary teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
dc.relationBeers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427–435
dc.relationBerndt, T. J., Perry, T. B., & Miller, K. E. (1988). Friends’ and classmates’ interaction on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 506–513.
dc.relationBerndt, T.J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66 , 1312–1329
dc.relationBoekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 377-397
dc.relationBoekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 3(4), 195-200
dc.relationBoekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researcher, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7 (2): 161-186
dc.relationBoekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 445-457
dc.relationBoekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic. Butler, D., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Review, 65, 245–281
dc.relationBouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C. y Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, pp. 317–329.
dc.relationBoutin, F., & Chinien, C. A. (1992). Synthesis of research on student selection criteria in formative evaluation. Educational Technology, 32(8), 28-31
dc.relationBrown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behaviour among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530
dc.relationBruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
dc.relationBruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition In A. Sinclair, R., J. Jarvelle, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.) The Child's Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag
dc.relationBruning, R. H., Shraw, G. J., & Ronning R. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (2nd ed.). Engle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
dc.relationBrush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333-356
dc.relationBurns, H.L. & Capps, C.G. (1988). “Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction”. En M. Polson & Richardson (eds). Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lawrwncw Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USA
dc.relationBurton, J. K., Moore, D. M. & Holmes, G. A. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, II (3/4), pp. 345-369.
dc.relationButler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback on self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, pp: 245-281.
dc.relationCampanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems (AEDS) Journal, 12(l), 21-30.
dc.relationCampione, J. C., Brown, A. L. Ferrara, R. A,, & Bryant, N. R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), New directions for child developnent: "Children S leanling in the zone of proximal development" (pp. 77-9 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
dc.relationCarr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595
dc.relationCarr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595
dc.relationChen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23, 183–220.
dc.relationChi, M. T.H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (vol.5) (pp. 161-238). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationChi, M. T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-534
dc.relationChinien, C. & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303-311
dc.relationChou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151-176
dc.relationCobb, R. (2003). The relationship between self-regulated learning behaviors and academic performance in web-based courses. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction
dc.relationCorno, L. & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18, 1.
dc.relationCorno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning : A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.111-142). New York: Springer-Verlag
dc.relationCorno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, (pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.relationCovington, M. V., & Mueller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157- 176.
dc.relationCrozier W. R. (2001). Diferencias individuales en el aprendizaje: Personalidad y Rendimiento Escolar. Ed. Narcea, S.A. Madrid – España
dc.relationCurry, L. (1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive of learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa: Canadian College of Health Services Executives
dc.relationDabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540
dc.relationDabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540.
dc.relationDavis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the lifespan (pp.149-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.relationDe Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 645–670
dc.relationDe Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 555–573
dc.relationDemetriadis, S. N., & Pombortsis, A. (1999). Novice student learning in case based hypermedia environment: A quantitative study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 241–269
dc.relationDemetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers & Education, 51, 939–954
dc.relationDillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In H. Spada, & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
dc.relationDillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationEccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.
dc.relationElliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519
dc.relationEom, W., & Reiser, R. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 247–260
dc.relationEpstein, J. L. (1983). The influence of friends on achievement and affective outcomes. In J. L. Epstein & N. Karweit (Eds.), Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 177–200). New York: Academic.
dc.relationErcikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Constructing data. In C. Conrad & R. Serlin (Eds.), SAGE Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 451–475). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.relationEricsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
dc.relationEstell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in innercity early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518–528.
dc.relationFischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232
dc.relationFisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene, J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 776-783
dc.relationFritz, R. L. (1994). Gender differences in field-dependence and educational style. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 19(1), 1-21.
dc.relationGarcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 127-153. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relationGordon, H.R.D. (1998). Identifying Learning Styles. Paper presented at the annual Summer Workshop for Beginning Vocational Education Teachers, West Virginia University Institute of Technology, July 20, 1998
dc.relationGraesser, A. C., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through PointyQuery, AutoTutor and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234.
dc.relationGraesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Kruez, R. (2000). AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 35–51.
dc.relationGray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 54-56.
dc.relationGreene, B. & Land, S. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(2): 151–179.
dc.relationGreene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125–148
dc.relationGreene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50, 1069–1083.
dc.relationGros, B. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Gedisa. Barcelona – España
dc.relationGuisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F, Tinajero C, & Almeida, L.S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema. Vol. 19, nº 4, pp. 572-577.
dc.relationHadwin, A. F. & Winne, P.H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. Vol. 7, No. 2-3, pp. 313-334.
dc.relationHagen, A. S. & Weinstein, C. E. (1995). Achievement goals, self-regulated learning, and the role of classroom context. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall): 43-55.
dc.relationHair, J.F., Anderson, R.F., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2007). Análisis multivariante. Quinta edición. Pearson, Prentice Hall., España
dc.relationHall J. K. (2000). Field Dependence-Independence and Computer-based Instruction in Geography. Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Teaching and Learning.
dc.relationHandal, B., & Herrington, T. (2004). On being dependent and independent in computer based learning environments. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, (7)2.
dc.relationHannafin, M. & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumption of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
dc.relationHannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1999). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99
dc.relationHartley, K. & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 275-289.
dc.relationHartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285–305.
dc.relationHederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá-Colombia
dc.relationHederich, C. & Camargo, A (1999). Estilos Cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-Colciencias
dc.relationHederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo en la educación. Itinerario Educativo: Revista de la Facultad de Educación. Universidad de San Buenaventura. Bogotá. No 36.43-75
dc.relationHederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2001). Estilo cognitivo y logro educativo en la ciudad de Bogotá. Bogotá: Centro de investigaciones de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Ciup. Instituto para la investigación educativa y el desarrollo pedagógico, IDEP
dc.relationHederich, C., Camargo, A., Guzmán, L. & Pacheco, J.C. (1995) Regiones Cognitivas en Colombia. Santafé de Bogotá : Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - Colciencias
dc.relationHeider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
dc.relationHickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: a stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 402-429.
dc.relationHiemstra, R. (1996). Self-directed learning. In T. Plomp & R. Ely (Eds.), International encyclopedia of educational technology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Pp. 347-352
dc.relationHogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
dc.relationHoney, P. & Munford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (versión revisada). Maidenhead: Peter Honey
dc.relationHunter-Blanks, P., Ghatala, E. S., Pressley, M. & Levin, J. R. (1988). Comparison of monitoring during testing on a sentence-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 279-283.
dc.relationInkpen, K., Booth, K. & Klawe M., (1996). Cooperative Learning In The Classroom: The Importance of a Collaborative. Environment for Computer-Based Education. Department of Computer Science. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, British Columbia. V6T 1Z4
dc.relationJackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). MODEL-IT: A design retrospective. In M. Jacobson, y R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 77-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationJacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199.
dc.relationJärvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: a context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244
dc.relationJonassen, D. H. (1989). Hypertext - hypermedia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
dc.relationJonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relationJonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp.694-719). New York: Macmillan
dc.relationJones, M., Estell, D. & Alexander, J. (2008). Friends, classmates, and self-regulated learning: discussions with peers inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and Learning. Springer Science + Business Media.
dc.relationJoo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.
dc.relationKandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 319–342.
dc.relationKanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. En M. D. Dunnette y Hough, L. M (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol 1). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc
dc.relationKarabenick, S. A. (1996). Social influences on metacognition: Effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 689–703
dc.relationKauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1&2), 139–161.
dc.relationKaya, S. (2007). The influences of student views related to mathematics and self-regulated learning on achievement of algebra I students. Dissertation. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University
dc.relationKini, A. S. (1994). Effects of cognitive style and verbal and visual presentation modes on concept learning in cbi. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 18.
dc.relationKinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. C. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299-303
dc.relationKirschner F., Paas F. & Kirschner P.A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 306–314
dc.relationKirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306–314.
dc.relationKirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403–420.
dc.relationKolb, D. A. (1977). Aprendizaje y solución de problemas. En Kolb, D. A; Rubin, I. M. & Mc Intyre, J. M. (Eds.), Psicología de las organizaciones: problemas contemporáneos ( 1ª edición en español, pp. 18-34). Madrid: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relationKolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
dc.relationKramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2005). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33.
dc.relationKramarski, B., & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 35–45.
dc.relationKramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006a). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–230.
dc.relationKramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006b). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43.
dc.relationKuhl, J . (1992). A theory of self-regulation: action versus state orientation, self discrimination and some applications. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 41(2), 97-129
dc.relationKush, J.C. (1984). Cognitive processing differences in Mexican-American and Anglo-American student. Dissertation abstract international,45,1075
dc.relationKwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using Computers to Individually-generate vs. Collaboratively-generate Concept Maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 269-280.
dc.relationLajoie, P. (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relationLajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803–821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationLand, S. y Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research y Development, 48(3), 61-78
dc.relationLand, S.M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(4), 65-84.
dc.relationLazakidou, G. & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54 (2010) 3–13
dc.relationLeader, L. F., & Klein, J.D. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 5-15.
dc.relationLee, I.S. (1999). An analysis of learners' perspectives and learning styles in a Web-based environment mixed with a traditional classroom.Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'99), the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Chiba, Japan, November 4–7, 468–475.
dc.relationLepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O’Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan y M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108–144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
dc.relationLepper, M., & Wolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aranson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. New York, NY: Academic Press
dc.relationLin, X. D., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36(7), 1–22.
dc.relationLiu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning Styles in hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior 10, (4), 419 434.
dc.relationLopez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales. Tesis Doctoral.. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.relationLozano, R.A. (2006). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza: Un panorama de la estilística educativa. Editotal Trillas. México
dc.relationLucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139.
dc.relationLucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139
dc.relationLumpe, A. T., & Staver, J.R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 71-98.
dc.relationLyons-Lawrence, C.L. (1994). Effect of learning style on performance in using computer-based instruction in office systems. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 36(3), 166-175.
dc.relationMace, F., Belfiore, P., & Shea, M. (1989). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 27-50). New York: Springer-Verlag
dc.relationMacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189–206.
dc.relationMainemelis, C.; Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. (2002). Learning styles and daptive flexibility. Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning. 33, 5-33.
dc.relationMäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 603–622.
dc.relationMarkus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337
dc.relationMayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationMcCaslin, M. (2004). Coregulation of opportunity, activity, and identity in student motivation. In D. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited, Vol. 4 (pp. 249e274). Greenwich, CT: Information Age
dc.relationMcCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A vygotskian view. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relationMcCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer-Verlag
dc.relationMcIsaac, M.S. & Gunawardena, C.N. (1996). Distance Education. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed) . Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a proyect of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. New York, N.Y: Simon & Schuster-Macmillan, pp. 403-437.
dc.relationMcManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219–251
dc.relationMeece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
dc.relationMeece, J. L. (1994). The role of motivation in self-regulated learning. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 25-44. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relationMelara, G.E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertexts environments: hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 313-328.
dc.relationMerrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 315–372
dc.relationMeyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Reconceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377-390.
dc.relationMoos, D. C. & Azevedo, R. (2006). The Role of Goal Structure in Undergraduates' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes in Two Hypermedia Learning Tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15 no1 49-86
dc.relationMoos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 1686–1706.
dc.relationMoos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298
dc.relationMorrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(l), 5-13.
dc.relationMulton, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
dc.relationMurphy, H. J., Casey, B., Day, D. A., & Young, J. D. (1997). Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1135-1138
dc.relationMyint S. K. (1996). The interaction of cognitive styles with varying levels of feedback in multimedia presentation. International Journal of Instructional Media v23, No 3, pp. 229-37.
dc.relationNarciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144
dc.relationNesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson‐Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., Bratt, S., Wang, W., & Hadwin, A. F. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358.
dc.relationNichols, J. D., & White, J. (2001). Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 267–273
dc.relationO'Neil, H. F., & Drillings, M. (1994). Motivation : Theory and Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relationPaas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
dc.relationPaas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.
dc.relationPackard, A. L., Holmes, G. A., Viveiros, D. M., & Fortune, J. C. (1997). Incorporating individual learning styles into computer assisted environments for instruction basic research and statistical concepts. Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, 6.
dc.relationPajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner, (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: Self perception (Vol. 2) Westport CT: Ablex Publishing
dc.relationPape, S.J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: lassification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419-449.
dc.relationParis, S.G. & Byrnes, J.P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. En B.J. Zimmerman y D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
dc.relationParis, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
dc.relationPea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.
dc.relationPintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning
dc.relationPintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 801-813
dc.relationPintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames and M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
dc.relationPintrich, P. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In R. J. Menges & M. D. Svinicki (Eds.), Understanding self-regulated learning, New Directions for teaching and learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
dc.relationPintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.
dc.relationPintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. international Journal ofEducationa1 Research, 31,459-470.
dc.relationPintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
dc.relationPintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & De Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161
dc.relationPintrich, P., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in college classroom. In M. Mahr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Vol. 6: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371-403). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
dc.relationPintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationPintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
dc.relationPi-Sui-Hsu y Dwyer F. (2004). Effect of level of adjunct questions on achievement of field independent/field dependent learners. International Journal of Instructional Media 31 No 1, pp. 99-106.
dc.relationPressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self regulation: complex, long term and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 34 (4), 207-212
dc.relationPressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 265–286, 2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic
dc.relationProske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531.
dc.relationPuntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12
dc.relationRamirez, M. & Castañeda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education. New York: Academic
dc.relationReed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87–98
dc.relationReeve, J. (1996). Motivating Others: Nurturing Inner Motivational Resources. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
dc.relationReiff, J. (1996). At-risk middle level students or field dependent learners. Clearing House, 69(4), 231-234
dc.relationReiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.
dc.relationReiser, B.J,, Tabak, I., Sandoval, W., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. Carver y D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationReiser, B.J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the CSCL (pp. 255-264).
dc.relationReusser, K. (2001). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In N. J. Smelser, P. Baltes, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2058e2062). Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier Science
dc.relationRiding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3-4), 193-215
dc.relationRiding, R. & Rayner. (1997). Towards a Categorization of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, Vol. 17, Nos. 1 and 2, 5-27.
dc.relationRoces C. & González M. (1998). Capacidad de autorregulación del proceso de aprendizaje. En Dificultades de aprendizaje escolar. Ed. Piramide. Madrid-España
dc.relationRoces, C., González, M. C. & Tourón, J. (1997). Expectativas de aprendizaje y rendimiento de los alumnos universitarios. Revista de Psicología de la Educación, 22, 99-123.
dc.relationRogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationRohrkemper, M. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygostskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 143-167). New York: Springer
dc.relationRoschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: Springer
dc.relationRotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, Whole No. 609
dc.relationRouet, J.F. (2000). Hypermedia and learning- cognitive perspectives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 97-101.
dc.relationRyan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescents motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150
dc.relationRydell A, Altermatt, E., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123
dc.relationSalonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction e what can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208
dc.relationSalovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 39–52.
dc.relationSaye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77-96.
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 71-86.
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26 (3 and 4): 207-231.
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 75-99. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (1997). Self-monitoring as a motivator during instruction with elementary school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL
dc.relationSchunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159- 172
dc.relationSchunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251–260
dc.relationSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208
dc.relationSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and the ends. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 349–367, 2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic
dc.relationSchwartz, L. R. & Gredler, M. E. (1998). The effects of self-instructional materials on goal setting and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education (Winter): 83-89
dc.relationShapiro, A. M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 215–243
dc.relationShapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57–78.
dc.relationShapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationShin, M. (1998). Promoting students' self-regulation ability: Guidelines for instructional design. Educational Technology (Jan-Feb): 38-44.
dc.relationSins, P. H. M., Joolingen, W. R. van, Savelsbergh, E. R., & Hout-Wolters, B. V. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 58–77.
dc.relationSmith, P.A. (2001). Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues In Accounting Education. Vol. 16, 4; pp. 663-700.
dc.relationStahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs, and metacognitive calibration: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338
dc.relationSummerville, J. (1999). Role of awareness of cognitive style in hypermedia. International Journal of Educational Technology. 1(1).
dc.relationSweet, M. & Pelton-Sweet, L. (2008). The Social Foundation of Team-Based Learning: Students Accountable to Students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 116. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley InterScience. Revisada en agosto 20, 2009 en www.interscience.wiley.com
dc.relationTennant, M. (1988). Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.
dc.relationTennyson, C. L., Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1980). Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4). 499-50.
dc.relationTennyson, R. D., Park, O. C., & Christensen, D. L. (1985). Adaptive control of learning time and content sequence in concept learning using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 481-491.
dc.relationTergan, S.O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209-235
dc.relationTinajero, C & Páramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement : a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212.
dc.relationUrdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students´ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122
dc.relationVan Blerkom, M. (1988). Field dependence, sex role self-perceptions, and mathematics achievement. College student: A Closer examination, En:Contemporany Educational Psychology 13, 339-347.
dc.relationVan Boxtel, C. A. M., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311–330.
dc.relationVan Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121–138.
dc.relationVan den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.
dc.relationVan Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602
dc.relationVanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T. y Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition y Instruction 21(3): 209-250.
dc.relationVauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: a case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19-37.
dc.relationVolet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 341-356
dc.relationVolet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction 19, 128-143.
dc.relationVye, N., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., Barron, B., Zech, L., & CTGV. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, y A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationWang, S. L., & Lin, S. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2256–2268
dc.relationWeiner, B., L. Frieze, A. Kukla, L. Reed, S. Rest, &. Rosenbaum, R. (1971). Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure. In Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, edited by E. E. Jones et al. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press
dc.relationWeinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third edition, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 315-327. New York, NY: Macmillan.
dc.relationWeinstein, C., Schulte, A., & Cascallar, E. (1983). The learning and studies strategies inventory (LASSI): initial design and development, Technical Report, U. S. Army Research Institute for the social and behavioral sciences, Alexandria, VA
dc.relationWeinstein, C.; J. Husman & Dierking, D.(2000). Self regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En Boekaerts, M.; P. Pintrich y M. Zeidner 2000 Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego. Academic Press.
dc.relationWeller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10(3/4), 401-420.
dc.relationWentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209
dc.relationWhipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.
dc.relationWhite, B.Y., Shimoda, T.A., & Frederiksen, J.R. (2000). Facilitating students’ inquiry learning and metacognitive development through modifiable software advisers. In S.P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 97-132). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationWhyte, M. M., Knirk, F. G., Casey, R. J., & Willard, M. L. (1991). Individualistic vs. paired/cooperative computer assisted instruction: matching instructional method with cognitive style. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(4), 299-312
dc.relationWhyte, M., Karolick, D., & Taylor, M. D. (1996). Cognitive learning styles and their impact on curriculum development and instruction. Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 783-799
dc.relationWilliams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan
dc.relationWilliams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71–82.
dc.relationWilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Revisado en Diciembre de 2009 from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/wilson/wilson.html
dc.relationWinne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relationWinne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 51–572.
dc.relationWinne, P.H. & Hadwin, A.F. (1998). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing (p. 164). In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2 ed., pp. 153-189).
dc.relationWinne, P.H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187
dc.relationWinne, P.H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410.
dc.relationWinne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (1999). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
dc.relationWinter, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 369–372
dc.relationWinters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217.
dc.relationWitkin, H. & Asch, S.E. (1948). Studies in Space Orientation. III Perception of the Upright in the Absence of a Visual Field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-614.
dc.relationWitkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R. (1977a). Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,661-689.
dc.relationWitkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977b). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689
dc.relationWitkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins, NY: International University Press
dc.relationWitkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1979). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
dc.relationWitkin, H., Goodenough, D. & Oltman, K. (1979). Psychological differentiation: Current Status. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 7, 1127-1145.
dc.relationWood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Vol. 17, pp. 89-100
dc.relationYoung, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17–27.
dc.relationZehavi, N. (1995). Integrating software development with research and teacher education. Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 11-24.
dc.relationZhang, L.F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? – validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295-1311
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 3-17.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 3-21. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman y D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical Background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 166-183
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 284290
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. En D. H. Schunk y J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: causes and consequences (pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.relationZimmerman, B., y Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.relationZimmerman, B.J., & Paulson, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall) 63: 13-27
dc.relationZimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal 29: 663-676
dc.relationZimmerman, B.J., Bonner S. y Kovach R. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy. Psychology in the classroom: A series on Applied Educational Psychology. USA
dc.relationZydney, J. M. (2010). The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Computers & Education 54, 360–370
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.subjectAutorregulación
dc.subjectAprendizaje autorregulado
dc.subjectEstilos de aprendizaje
dc.subjectEstilo cognitivo
dc.subjectAmbientes computacionales
dc.titleAnálisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución