Efecto de un andamiaje de autoeficacia en el estilo cognitivo, el logro de aprendizaje y la carga cognitiva.

dc.contributorLópez Vargas, Omar
dc.creatorRamírez Ruiz, Judy Julieth
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T15:04:16Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T15:04:16Z
dc.date.created2019-11-28T15:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifierTO-22827
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/11082
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifierreponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN
dc.identifierrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractEl presente documento corresponde a una tesis de grado de maestría en Tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación, que estudia el efecto de un andamiaje de tipo motivacional en un ambiente de aprendizaje computacional, sobre la autoeficacia académica, el logro de aprendizaje y la carga cognitiva en estudiantes de grado quinto con diferente estilo cognitivo en la dimensión dependencia-Independencia de Campo.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.publisherMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
dc.relationAlomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-Based Learning Design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188-196.
dc.relationAndrade- Lotero, L. (2012). Teoría de la carga cognitiva, diseño multimedia y aprendizaje: un estado del arte. Magis, 75-92.
dc.relationAndrade, J., Huang, W.-H. D., & Bohn, D. M. (2015). The Impact of Instructional Design on College Students’ Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes in a Large Food Science and Human Nutrition Course. Journal of Food Science Education, 127-135.
dc.relationAngeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2013). Technology Mapping: An Approach for Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 199-221.
dc.relationArcher, L. (s.f.). The interactive effects of field dependence- independence and instructional aids on student achievement in web - based instructional systems (tesis doctoral). Estados Unidos: University of Pittsburgh.
dc.relationAzevedo, R., & Cromley, J. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 523-535.
dc.relationBaddelety, A. (1986). Baddeley, 1986. Oxford psychology series, No. 11. New York,: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1986). The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 359-373.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1987). Teoria del Aprendizaje Social. New York: ESPASA .
dc.relationBandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory. Annals of child development. Vol 6. Six theories of child development. Greenwich: CT:JAI Press.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in cognitive Development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 117-148.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1995). Self – efficacy in Changing Societies. En A. Bandura, Exercice of personal and collective efficacy (págs. 1-45). New York: University of Cambridge.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1997). Self- Efficacy: The Exercise of control . Freeman.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1998). Self-Efficacy. San Diego: Encyclopedia of mental health.
dc.relationBandura, A. (1999). Ejercicio de la eficacia personal y colectiva en sociedades cambiantes. En Bandura A. Autoeficacia: cómo afrontamos los cambios de la sociedad actual. Brower: Biblioteca de Psicologia BilbaoDecleé.
dc.relationBandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 52, 1-26.
dc.relationBandura, A. (2001). social cognitive theory: An Agentic perspective. Annual Reviews., 1-26.
dc.relationBuck, T. (2004). An Investgation of field dependence - Independence and cognitive abilities in a non-linear distance learning enviroment. Tesis Doctoral. Minneapolis, Estados Unidos: Walden University.
dc.relationCalderin Cruz , M., & Csoban , E. (2010). Elementos para un programa de alfabetización informacional: La autoeficacia hacia el uso de la computadora. Redalyc.
dc.relationCalderín, M., & Csoban , E. (2009). Elementos para un programa de alfabetización informacional: La autoeficacia hacia el uso de la computadora . BIBLIOS , 37.
dc.relationCampanizzi, J. A. (1978). The effects of locus-of-control and provision of overviews upon response latency and achievement in a computer-assisted instructional sequence. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(2-A), 830.
dc.relationChandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 8, 293-240.
dc.relationChen, C.-M., & Wu, C.-H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. ELSEVIER, 108-121.
dc.relationChen, I.-J., & Chang , C.-C. (2009). Teoría de la carga cognitiva: Un estudio sobre la ansiedad y el rendimiento en tarea de aprendizaje de idiomas. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 729-746.
dc.relationChen, L.-H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & education, 1028-1035.
dc.relationChen, S., & Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of a learning model. ournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
dc.relationChou, H.-W. (2001). Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness. Computers & Education, 11-25.
dc.relationCierniak, G., Scheiter , K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in human Behavior , 315-324.
dc.relationCierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315-324.
dc.relationClark, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learninf. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
dc.relationCollins, J. L. (1984). Self-efficacy and Ability in Achievement Behavior. United states: Stanford University.
dc.relationCooper, J. (1998). multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation. Management Decision, 36(8), 493-502.
dc.relationCowan, N. (2001). The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-114.
dc.relationCurry, L. (1983). An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. Montreal: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association
dc.relationDe Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Springer Link, 38(105), 105- 134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
dc.relationDe Ture, M. (2004). Cognitive Style and Self-Efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. . American Journal of distance Education, 21-38.
dc.relationPhysicians' Instruction of PACS Through E-Learning: Cognitive Load Theory Applied. Journal of Digital Imaging ·, 25-33.
dc.relationDoménech, F., Abellán, L., & Gómez, A. (2017). Self- Efficacy, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement: The mediator Role of Students' Expectancy- Value Beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1193).
dc.relationDosher, B. (2003). Working memory. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
dc.relationDuncan, T., Pintrich, P., Smith, D., & Mckeachie, W. (1991). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Manual.
dc.relationFritz, R. (1994). Gender Differences in Field-Dependence and Educational Style. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 19(1), 1-21.
dc.relationGerhardt, M. W., & Brown, K. G. (2006). Individual differences in self-efficacy development: The effects of goal orientation and affectivity. 43-59.
dc.relationGist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 884-891.
dc.relationGray, J. A. (1987). The Psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationGray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of computer based instruction, 54-56.
dc.relationGuinea, G., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring Quality of Perception in Distributed Multimedia: Verbalizers vs. Imagers. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics.
dc.relationGuisande, A., Páramo, F., Soares, A. P., & Almeida, L. (2007). Field Dependence- Independence and career counseling: Directions for research. Perceptual and motor skills(104), 654-662.
dc.relationHandal, B., & Herrington, A. (2004). On Being Dependent or Independent in Computer Based Learning Environments. . UTS ePress.
dc.relationHederich, C. (2004). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. . BellaTerra: Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona.
dc.relationHederich, C. (2010). Acerca de la noción general de estilo en la educación. Pertinencia, importancia y especificidad. Revista actualidades Pedagógicas, 55, 13-21.
dc.relationHederich, C., & Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo en la educación. Itinerario Educativo. Revista de la Facultad de Educación, Universidad de San Buenaventura(36), 43-75.
dc.relationHederich, C., López, A., Paramo, P., & Sanabria, L. (2013). Aprendizaje situado: género y entornos de aprendizaje. Nodos y nudos, 4(35), 22-34.
dc.relationKagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(1), 17-24.
dc.relationKalyuga, S. (2009). Knowledge elaboration: A cognitive load perspective. Learning and Instruction, 19(5). doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.003
dc.relationKinzie, M., Sullivan, H., & Berdel , R. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299-303.
dc.relationKirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629.
dc.relationLent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991, Octubre). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424-430.
dc.relationLepper, M., & Wolverton, M. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. New York: En J. Aranson (Ed.).
dc.relationLeppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog , T., Van der Vleuten, C. P., & Merriënboer, J. J. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 32-42.
dc.relationLiu, M., & Reed, M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior , 419-434.
dc.relationLopez , O., & Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autoregulado en ambientes hipermediales. . Revista Colombiana de Educación, 14.39..
dc.relationLópez , O., & Valencia, N. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: el efecto de un andamiaje computacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicologia , 29-41.
dc.relationLópez Vargas, O., Hederich Martinez, C., & Camargo Uribe, A. (2012). Logros de Aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: Andamiaje autoregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista latinoameriacana de Psicologia, 13-26.
dc.relationLopez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autoregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro academico en ambientes computacionales. Bogotá: Tesis Doctoral Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relationLopez, O., & Triana, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación , 225-244.
dc.relationLópez, O., Hederich, C., & Camargo, A. (2011). Estilo Cognitivo y Logro Academico . Educación y Educadores , 67-82.
dc.relationLópez, O., Ibañez, J., & Chiguasuque, E. (2014). El estilo cognitivo y la fijación de metas de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales. Pensamiento Psicológico, 12(1), 133-148.
dc.relationLopéz, O., Ibáñez, J., & Racines, O. (2017). La metacognición de los estudiantes, el estilo cognitivo y su efecto sobre la carga cognitiva y el logro de aprendizaje. Tecnología educativa y sociedad, 20(3), 146-167.
dc.relationLópez, O., Sanabria, L., & Sanabria, M. (2014). Logro de Aprendizaje en Ambienes computacionales: autoeficacia, metas y estilo cognitivo. Psicología desde el Caribe, 475 - 494.
dc.relationLyons-Lawrence, C. (1994). Effect of Learning Style on Performance in Using Computer-Based Instruction in Office Systems. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 36(3).
dc.relationMartinez, J., Sanabria, L., & López , O. (2016). Relationships between learning achievement, self-monitoring cognitive style, and learning style in medical students. Praxis & Saber, 141-164.
dc.relationMayer, R. (2002). Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two‐Way Street Between Cognition and Instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning.
dc.relationMayer, R. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationMayer, R., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390-397.
dc.relationMayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107-119.
dc.relationMefoh, P., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. C., & Chijoke, A. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problem solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity
dc.relationMefoh, P., Nwoke, M., Chuckwuorji, J., & Chijoke, A. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescentes. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
dc.relationMiller, G. (1956). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343-352.
dc.relationMilner, B. (1966). Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. En Amnesia (págs. 109-133). London: Butterworth: Whitty, C.W.M & Zangwill, O L.
dc.relationMiyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory. Cambridge university press.
dc.relationPaas , F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 23(1), 63-71.
dc.relationPajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-Beliefs and School Success: Self-Efficacy, Self-Concept, and School Achievement. In R. J. Riding, & S. G. Rayner (Eds.). International Perspectives on Individual Differences: Self-Perception, 2, 239-265.
dc.relationPerry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715-729.
dc.relationPintrich, P., D. Smith, T. García y W. McKeachie (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. University of Michigan.
dc.relationPintrich, P., & Shunk , D. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Michigan: 2, illustrated.
dc.relationPuzziferro, M. (2008). Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses. Journal American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.
dc.relationRacines, J. (2014). Influencia de un andamiaje autorregulador sobre el nivel de carga cognitiva, en estudiantes que aprenden de forma individual en un ambiente hipermedia. Bogotá, Colombia: Tesis de Maestria Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relationRheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Wolfram, R. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. En Handbook of self-regulation (págs. 503-529). San Diego: In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner .
dc.relationRiding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive Styles--An Overview and Integration. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
dc.relationRuiz, F. (2015). Influencia de la autoeficacia en el ámbito académico. Revista digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria (RIDU), 1-16.
dc.relationSawa, H. (1966). Analytic Thinking and Synthetic Thinking. Bulletin of faculty of Education, 13, 1-16. Nagasaky University.
dc.relationScheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., & Brucker, B. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 481-494.
dc.relationSchnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Some Motivational Aspects of cognitive Load Theory. 86-113. Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives.
dc.relationSchunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 207- 231.
dc.relationShaffer, D., Doube, W., & Tuovinen, J. (2003). Applying Cognitive Load Theory to Computer Science Education. UK: Paper presented at the 15thWorkshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group,.
dc.relationShapka, J. D., & Ferrari, M. (2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior,, 319-334.
dc.relationSweller , J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
dc.relationSweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
dc.relationSweller, J. (2006). Discussion of ‘Emerging Topics in Cognitive Load Re-search: Using Learner and Information Characteristics in the Design of Powerful Learning Environments’. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 353-357.
dc.relationSweller, J. (2008). Human cognitive architecture. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 369-381.
dc.relationSweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of experimental psychology, 119(2), 176.
dc.relationTejada Zabaleta, A. (2005). Agenciación humana en la teoría Cognitivo Social. Definición y posibilidades de Aplicación . Pensamiento Psicologíco , 117-123.
dc.relationTennan, M., & Pogson, P. (1995). Learning and Change in the Adult Years: A Developmental Perspective. First Edition. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Service Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
dc.relationTriana, S. (2012). Autoeficacia, estilocognitivo y logro academico en ambientes computacionales . Bogotá: Tesis de Maestria, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relationTzeng, J.-Y. (2009). The impact of general and specific perfomance and self-efficacy on learning with computer- based concept mapping. Computers in human Behavior , 989-996.
dc.relationUrquijo, S. (2002). Auto-Concepto y Desempeño académico en adolescentes. Relaciones con sexo, edad e institución. Psico-USF, 211 - 218.
dc.relationUsher, E., & Pájares, F. (2008). Sources of sel-efficay in School: Critical Review of the literature and future Directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751-796.
dc.relationValencia, N. (2017, Octubre). Autoeficacia académica, Capacidad metacognitiva, logro de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo en ambientes e-learning. Bogotá, Colombia: Tesis Doctoral.
dc.relationWang, S.-L., & Lin, S. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2256–2268.
dc.relationWeller, H., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. (1994). The Relationship of Learning, Behavior, and Cognitive Style in Hypermedia-Based Instruction. Computers in the Schools, 10(3-4), 401-418.
dc.relationWitkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures*. Journal of Personality, 19(1), 1-15.
dc.relationWitkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, B., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception: an experimental and clinical study. Oxford, England: Harper.
dc.relationYuan, K., Steedle, J., Shavelson, R., Alonzo, A., & Opezzo, M. (2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning. Educational Research Review , 93 -98.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. New York : Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of educational Psychology, 91(2), 241.
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.subjectAutoeficacia académica
dc.subjectAndamiaje motivacional
dc.subjectCarga cognitiva
dc.subjectLogros de aprendizaje y estilos cognitivos
dc.titleEfecto de un andamiaje de autoeficacia en el estilo cognitivo, el logro de aprendizaje y la carga cognitiva.
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución