dc.creatorCarugati, Manuela
dc.creatorAliberti, Stefano
dc.creatorReyes, Luis Felipe
dc.creatorSadud, Ricardo Franco
dc.creatorIrfan, Muhammad
dc.creatorPrat, Cristina
dc.creatorSoni, Nilam J.
dc.creatorFaverio, Paola
dc.creatorGori, Andrea
dc.creatorBlasi, Francesco
dc.creatorRestrepo, Marcos I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T12:40:30Z
dc.date.available2020-10-19T12:40:30Z
dc.date.created2020-10-19T12:40:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-19
dc.identifierCarugati M, Aliberti S, Reyes LF, et al. Microbiological testing of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: an international study. ERJ Open Res 2018; 4: 00096-2018 [https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00096-2018].
dc.identifier2312-0541
dc.identifierhttps://openres.ersjournals.com/content/4/4/00096-2018
dc.identifierhttps://openres.ersjournals.com/content/erjor/4/4/00096-2018.full.pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10818/43695
dc.identifier10.1183/23120541.00096-2018
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to describe real-life microbiological testing of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and to assess concordance with the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) and 2011 European Respiratory Society (ERS) CAP guidelines. This was a cohort study based on the Global Initiative for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia (GLIMP) database, which contains point-prevalence data on adults hospitalised with CAP across 54 countries during 2015. In total, 3702 patients were included. Testing was performed in 3217 patients, and included blood culture (71.1%), sputum culture (61.8%), Legionella urinary antigen test (30.1%), pneumococcal urinary antigen test (30.0%), viral testing (14.9%), acute-phase serology (8.8%), bronchoalveolar lavage culture (8.4%) and pleural fluid culture (3.2%). A pathogen was detected in 1173 (36.5%) patients. Testing attitudes varied significantly according to geography and disease severity. Testing was concordant with IDSA/ATS and ERS guidelines in 16.7% and 23.9% of patients, respectively. IDSA/ATS concordance was higher in Europe than in North America (21.5% versus 9.8%; p<0.01), while ERS concordance was higher in North America than in Europe (33.5% versus 19.5%; p<0.01). Testing practices of adults hospitalised with CAP varied significantly by geography and disease severity. There was a wide discordance between real-life testing practices and IDSA/ATS/ERS guideline recommendations.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Journal Open Research
dc.relationERJ Open Res 2018;4: 00096-2018
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectPneumonia
dc.subjectMicrobiological
dc.subjectDiagnostic testing
dc.subjectPatients
dc.titleMicrobiological testing of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: an international study
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución