dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T15:15:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T14:46:22Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T15:15:45Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T14:46:22Z
dc.date.created2019-08-23T15:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierReveiz L, Haby MM, Martı´nez-Vega R, Pinzo´n-Flores CE, Elias V, Smith E, et al. (2017) Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180220
dc.identifierhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501456/pdf/pone.0180220.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/36803
dc.identifier10.1371/journal.pone.0180220
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3483491
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Given the severity and impact of the current Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak in the Americas, numerous countries have rushed to develop research studies to assess ZIKV and its potential health consequences. In an effort to ensure that studies are comprehensive, both internally and externally valid, and with reliable results, the World Health Organization, the Pan American Health Organization, Institut Pasteur, the networks of Fiocruz, the Consortia for the Standardization of Influenza Seroepidemiology (CONSISE) and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) have generated six standardized clinical and epidemiological research protocols and questionnaires to address key public health questions on ZIKV.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPLoS One
dc.relationPLoS ONE 12(7), 2017
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleRisk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución