masterThesis
Creating connections: the impact of self-assessment strategies and technology in speaking accuracy
Fecha
2018-10-12Registro en:
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership,
57(5), 13-19
Ariza, A., & Suarez, M. (2013). Effectiveness of the integration of ICT tools and activities to
foster awareness as the first stage to reach learning autonomy. Gist Education and
learning Research Journal, 7, 154-172.
Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisions, and directions.
US: Heinle & Heinle
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and
Company.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood. Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching: Computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.).
Harlow: Longman/Pearson.
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. New York, NY:
Routledge.
Boisvert, P., & Rao, K. (2014). Video self-modeling for English Language Learners. TESOL
Journal, VI(I).
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies
in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167.
Brand, C., & Götz, S. (2011). Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language: A
multi-method approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 255-275. doi:
10.1075/ijcl.16.2.05bra
Brown, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language: An approach based on the analysis of
conversational English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Inc
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Pearson Education.
Brown, J. D. (2003). Promoting fluency in EFL classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual
JALT Pan-SIG conference (pp.1-12). Kyoto institute of Technology Kyoto, Japan.
Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency
and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bryant, S. M. & Hunton, J. E. (2000). The use of technology in the delivery of instruction:
Implications for accounting educators and education researchers. Issues in Accounting
Education, 15(1), 129-163.
Burham, A. (2009). Second language teaching and linguistics. Palembag: Grafika Telindo Press.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for
practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge
Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English
Language Teaching and Research.
Bush, M., & Crotty, W. (1991). Interactive videodisc in language teaching. In W. F. Smith (Ed.),
Modern technology in foreign language education: applications and projects.
Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self- assessment among young learners of English.
Language Testing, (1), 5-31. doi: 10.1177/0265532209346370
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, D. (1986). Teaching oral English. Harlow: Longman.
Cakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching
classroom. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4).
Campillo, M. (2006). Acquisition and transfer of a writing revision strategy: A self-regulatory
analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International, The Humanities and Social Sciences.
67,03.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second
language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other
languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Chang, M. (2010). Effects of self- monitoring on web-based language learner: Performance and
motivation. Calico Journal (2), 298-310.
Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computerassisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753. doi:
10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x
Chappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. England: Pearson Longman.
Chen, Y. (2011). The influence of integrating technology in language learning courses (Doctoral
dissertation) Retrieved from KU ScholarsWorks.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.).
London: Routledge.
Corbin, J. M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing
grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Council of Europe. (2001). In Cambridge University Press (Ed.), Common European framework
of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Dann, R, (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London,
UK: Routledge
Dodd, A. (1995). Engaging students: What I learned along the way. Educational Leadership, 53,
65-68.
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language
classroom. In : J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning
(pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drobot, I. (2014). Teaching communication in the English language: How and why? Scientific
Journal of Humanistic Studies, 6(11), 89-91.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Flick, U. (2002). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage Publications Inc.
Gardner, (1999). Self-assessment for autonomous language learners. Links & Letters, 7, 49-60
Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern
Language Journal, 75(1), 74-101.
Gipps, C. (1994) Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer
Press
Glasser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. In Forum Qualitative
Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. V).
Graham, C. (2005). Blended learning systems: definitions, current trends and future directions.
In C. J. Bonk & C.R. Graham, Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local
designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer
Gregory, K., Cameron, C., & Forewor, A. D. (2000). Knowing what counts: Self-Assessment and
goal setting. Merville, BC: Connections.
Gromik, N. A. (2010). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case
study. Computers & Education. LVIII(I), 223-230
Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between
formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &
Practice, 4(3), 365-379. doi: 10.1080/0969594970040304
Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Essex, UK: Longman.
Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. English Language
Teaching Journal, 51(1), 12-20.
Harris, M. & McCann, P. (1994). Assessment. London: Heinemann.
Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University
Press
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Heng-Tsung, D., & Shao-Ting, A. (2010). Examining the practice of a reading-to-speak test task:
Anxiety and experience of EFL students. ERIC, 11(2), 235-242
Hillier, Y. (2002). Reflective Teaching in Further and Adult Education. London, UK:
Continuum.
Hunter, J. (2012). “Small Talk”: Developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT
Journal, 66(1), 30-41. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccq093
Hussain, M. A., Niwaz, A., Zaman, A., Dahar, M., & Akhtar, M. S. (2010). Technology-based
learning environment and student achievement in English as a foreign language in Pakistan. Journal of World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 61, 129-
133.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). “On Communicative Competence” In: J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds)
Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293. (Part 2)
James, R. (1996). CALL and the Speaking Skill. System, 24(1), 15-21.
Johnson, K. (2013). An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. New York,
NY: Routledge.
Johnson, R. K. (1989). The second language curriculum. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (1992). The action research planner: Doing critical
participatory action research. London, UK: Springer
Khan, N., & Ali, A. (2010). Improving the speaking ability in English: The students’ perspective.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3575-3579. doi:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.554
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon
Press.
Krashen, S. (1995). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York:
USA: Phoenix Elt
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the
special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 418-420. doi: 10.2307/328580
Law, B. & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL: An alternative approach. New York: Portage
& Main Press
Lee, Y.-j. J., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Using video technology to diagnose EFL students’ cognitive
learning difficulties in public speaking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64,
671-680. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.079
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: context and conceptualization. New
York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Light, D., Manso, M., & Noguera, T. (2009). An Educational revolution to support change in the
classroom: Colombia and the educational challenges of the twenty-first century. Policy
Futures in Education, 7(1), 88-101. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.1.88
Manurung, K. (2015). Improving the speaking skill using reading contextual internet-based
instructional materials in an EFL class in Indonesia. Elsevier, 176(2), 44-51.
Nilson, L,. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34-38
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Australia: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Odlin, T. (1994). Perspectives on pedagogical grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge
University Press.
Omaggio, A. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
O’Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Orozco, D. (2013). Communicative activities as a way to foster the oral use of English and
confidence in the oral expression. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from DSpace Digital
Dissertations.
Paris, S. G. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning.
Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
Pawar, M. S. (2004). Data collecting methods and experiences: A guide for social researchers.
Elgin, IL: Dawn Press
Pop, A., Tomuletiu, E. A., & David, D. (2011). EFL speaking communication with asynchronous
voice tools for adult students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1199-1203.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.262
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching Digital Natives. London, UK: Sage Company.
Regan, V., Howard, M., & Lemee, I. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a
study abroad context. Salisbury, UK: Short Run Press
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and
Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33
Rodriguez, E. (2007). Self-assessment practices: An empowering tool in the teaching and
learning EFL processes. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (9), 229-246.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional
Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
Sambell, K., McDowell, L. & Sambell, B. (2006). But it is fair?: An exploratory study of student
perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.
Samra S. K. (2013). Technology in the classroom: Target or tool. ScienceDirect, 81(2), 609-612.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.
Seliger, H. W., Shohamy, E., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods (Vol.
31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Serie Guias No. 22 Estandares Basicos de competencias en Lenguas Extrangeras: Ingles. (2006).
Estandares Basicos de competencias en Lenguas Extrangeras: Ingles. Bogota, CO:
Ministerio de Educacion Nacional
Simonson, M., Smaildino, S., Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Thomas, M. (2013). Pedagogical Considerations and Opportunities for Teaching and Learning
on the Web. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Harlow, UK: Pearson education limited.
Thornbury, S. (2012). Chapter 21: Speaking instruction. In burns, A. & Richards, J., Pedagogy
and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp 198-207). New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wilches, A. (2014). Learner’s perceptions of the benefits of voice tool-based tasks on their
spoken performance. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, January (VIII),
48-65.
Willis, J., & Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford, UK:
Heinemann.
White, E. M. (2009) Putting Assessment for Learning into practice in a Higher Education EFL
Context. Boca Raton, FL: Dissertation.
Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research: Living Theory: London: Sage Publications
Ltd
YanJun, W. (2008). Collaborate to learn: A case study of technology-enhanced, collaborative
language learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1007(1), 189.
doi.org/10.1063/1.2937605
Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice,
41(2), 64-70.
270046
TE09892
Autor
Morales Pulido, Virginia
Institución
Resumen
Previous studies on technological devices in language improvement have indicated that audio and video features can be useful for oral production improvement. However, little attention has been paid to the self-assessment process that students can do through audio recording and its impact on spoken accuracy. The overall aim of this study was to identify the use of selfassessment strategies and two web 2.0 tools in language accuracy in a group of thirty-nine A2 level students at a public school in Bogota. The data collection process involved participant voice recordings, self-assessment checklists and logs and teacher field notes. After the data analysis and triangulation, there was evidence that students were able to self-monitor their language production, producing richer and more complex utterances. Additionally, computerbased tasks provided students with the opportunity to use and improve their speaking skills outside the classroom. The use of self-assessment strategies within the EFL classrooms represents a big chance to change the dynamics of language learning and teaching. Technology (web 2.0 tools) served as the vehicle for language learning. Consequently, this study evidenced a close relationship between self-assessment strategies and spoken accuracy. The pedagogical implication of this study offers teachers and researchers an opportunity to explore the use of technology and self-assessment as a trigger of language development in the EFL classrooms.