Colombia
| masterThesis
Development of a1 l2 learners’ literal reading comprehension of short online animated stories through vocabulary pre-reading activities
Fecha
2016-11-18Registro en:
Aarnoutse, C., van Leeuwe, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Early literacy from a longitudinal
perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 253-275.
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest
processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405.
Al-Dersi, Z. (2013). The use of short stories for developing vocabulary of EFL learners.
International Journal of English Language Translation Studies, 1(1), 72-86.
Alshumaimeri, Y. & Almasri, M. (2012). The effects of using webquests on reading
comprehension performance of saudi EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 295-306.
Altas, B. (2014). A case study of multimodal presentation of selected stage play literature in a
multimedia environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1726-1734.
Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York, NY: Peter
lang.
Anderson, N. (2003). Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online Reading Strategies in a
Second/Foreign Language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3).
Anderson, R. & Nagy, W. (1991). Word meanings. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P. &
Pearson, P.D.(Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 2,(pp. 690–724). New York, NY:
Longman.
Azizifar, A., Roshani, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading
activities on the reading comprehension performance of ilami high school students.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188-194.
Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1998). What reading research tells us about
children with diverse learning needs: Bases and Basics. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. New York,
NY: Routledge.
Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in
primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44. ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. EJ734337
Bloom, , B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy
of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive
domain. New York, NY: Longman Green
Bohannon III, J., Warren-Leubecker, A., & Hepler, N. (1984). Word order awareness and early
reading. Child Development, 55(4), 1541-1548. doi:10.2307/1130024Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Pearson education
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Pearson education
Brown, J. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative
Research, 6(1), 97-113.
Buchweitz, A., Mason, R., Tomitch, L., & Just, M. A. (2009). Brain activation for reading and
listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in
language comprehension. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2(2), 111-123.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners.
New York, NY: Routledge
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent
prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Cantrell, S. (1998). Effective teaching and literacy learning: A look inside primary classrooms.
The Reading Teacher, 5 (4), 370-378.
Catts, H., & Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the
simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278-
293.
Chacón, Y., & Zuluaga, I. (2012). Technological mediation in the English classroom for children
from 6 to 8 years (Graduate's thesis, Universidad de la Salle, Bogotá, Colombia).
Retrieved from repositorio.lasalle.edu.co/handle.net/10185/7903
Chen, C., Chen, S., Chen, S. E., & Wey, S. (2013). The effects of extensive reading via E-books
on tertiary level EFL students' reading attitude, reading comprehension, and vocabulary.
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 303-312.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System,
24(4), 503-519.
Clark, F. L., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., & Warner, M. M. (1984). Visual
imagery and self-questioning: Strategies to improve comprehension of written material.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(3), 145-149.
Cohen, A. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. New York, NY:
Routledge..
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures
and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design: Designing and
conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Cunningham, P. (1999). What should we do about phonics. In Gambrell, L.,Morrow, L., &
Pressley, M. (Eds.) Best practices in literacy instruction. (pp.68-89). New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
Day, Richard & Jeong-suk, Park. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading
in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on
EFL learner's engagement, achievement and competence in english speaking classrooms.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3890-3894.
Farías, M., Obilinovic, K., & Orrego, R. (2010). Modelos de aprendizaje multimodal y
enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista De
Ciències De l’Educació, 1(2), 55-74.
Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom
teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ford, K. (2005). Fostering literacy development in English language learners. Proceedings from:
American Federation of Teachers QuEST Conference.
Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225-241.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the
concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fry, R. (2012). Improve your reading. Wayne, NJ: Career Press.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an
indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
García, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the english reading test performance of spanishspeaking hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly,26(4), 371-392.
Gersten, R. & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching reading to early language learners. Educational
Leadership, 60(7), 44-49.
Gilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of multimodal learning
models on language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies, 1(10), 1321-1327.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative
inquiry. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine.
Golinkoff, R., & Rosinski, R. (1976). Decoding, semantic processing, and reading
comprehension skill. Child Development, 47(1), 252-258.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and
Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
Graff, H. (1981). Literacy and social development in the west. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Graves, M. F. (1994). Essentials of classroom teaching: Elementary reading methods. Boston,
MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Green, J., & Burgess, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge,
UK: Polity Press
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English-new edition. Harlow, England: Pearson Education
Limited.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(01), 25-38.
Higgins, S. J. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools. UK: BERA, British
Educational Research Association.
Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-
160.
House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40(2), 161-177.
Huckin, T., & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context: A cognitive
model. In Huckin, T (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning. (pp.
153-178). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written
Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in
a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23.
Inglis, F., & Aers, L. (2008). Key concepts in education. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality,“reading”, and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse:
Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331
Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and digital technologies in the classroom. In Ingrid de SaintGeorges and Jean-JacquesWeber (Eds.), Multilingualism and Multimodality. (pp. 141-
152). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Mankato, MN: Pearson.
Johnson, D., & Blair, A. (2003). The importance and use of student self-selected literature to
reading engagement in an elementary reading curriculum. Reading Horizons, 43(3), 181-
200.
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading
made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85-97.
Kahu, E. (2014). Increasing the emotional engagement of first year mature-aged distance
students: Interest and belonging. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher
Education, 5(2), 45.
Kaivanpanah, S., & Zandi, H. (2009). The role of depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading
comprehension in EFL contexts. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706
Kamil, M. L. (2004). Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of
the national reading panel findings. In McCardle, P. & Chhabra, V. (Eds.), The voice of
evidence in reading research (pp. 213-234). Baltimore, MD: Paul H.Brookes.
Karlin, R. (1980a). Teaching elementary reading: Principles and strategies. San Diego, CA:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Karlin, R. (1980b). Teaching elementary reading: Principles and strategies. San Diego, CA:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Kemmis, S., & MacTaggart, R. (1988). Cómo planificar la investigación-acción. Barcelona,
Spain: Laertes.
Kirschner, M., Spector-Cohen. E., & Wexler, C. (1996). A teacher education workshop on the
construction of efl tests and materials. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 85-111.
Kress, G. B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multimodality in B. cope & M. kalantzis
(ed) Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, UK:
Psychology Press.
Kropp, P. (1996). Raising a reader: Make your child a reader for life. New York, NY:
Broadway Books.
Ladd, G. W., Buhs, E. S., & Seid, M. (2000). Children's initial sentiments about kindergarten: Is
school liking an antecedent of early classroom participation and achievement? MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 46(2), 255-279.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom
practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University.
Laufer, B. (1996). The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension: What it is
and how it relates to L1 reading ability. In K. Sajavaara & C. Fairweather (Eds.),
Approaches to Second Language Acquisition.(pp.55-62). Jyväskylä, Finland: University
of Jyväskylä
Leider, C., Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., & Harring, J. R. (2013). Examining the role of
vocabulary depth, cross-linguistic transfer, and types of reading measures on the reading
comprehension of latino bilinguals in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 26(9),
1459-1485.
Lesaux, N. K., Crosson, A. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Pierce, M. (2010). Uneven profiles: Language
minority learners' word reading, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills. Journal
of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 475-483.
Leu, J. D. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the internet. What
Research has to Say about Reading Instruction, 3, 310-336.
Levy, M. (2012). Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) in independent schools in
Queensland. Queensland, Australia: Independent schools Queensland.
espace.library.uq.edu.au.
Lewin, C. (1997). Evaluating talking books: Ascertaining the effectiveness of multiple feedback
modes and tutoring techniques. Yearbook-National Reading Conference, 46, 360-371.
Lynne, C. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
Madaoui, R. (2013). Effects of pre-reading activities on EFL reading comprehension by
moroccan college students. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 9-19.
Manyak, P. C., & Bauer, E. B. (2009). English vocabulary instruction for English learners. The
Reading Teacher, 63(2), 174-176.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Data collection methods. Designing Qualitative Research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Martin‐Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential
links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading,
31(3), 273-284.
Marzban, A. (2011). Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted
language learning in iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 3-
10
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interpretative approach.Thousand Oaks,
CA. Sage.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McCarten, J. (2007). Teaching vocabulary. Lessons from the Corpus, Lessons For the
Classroom.Cambridge, England: CUP.
McKenna, M. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. Handbook of
Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, 1, 45-59.
Miller, L., Blackstock, J., & Miller, R. (1994). An exploratory study into the use of CD-ROM
storybooks. Computers & Education, 22(1), 187-204.
Ministerio de Educacion Nacional. (2006). Cartilla estándares básicos de competencias en
lengua extranjera: Ingles. Bogota, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional. doi imprenta Nacional.
Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of
vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563.
Mohamad, A. (1999). What do we test when we test reading comprehension? The Internet TESL
Journal, 5(12).
Morrison, M., Sweeney, A., & Hefferman, T. (2003). Learning styles of on-campus and offcampus marketing students: The challenge for marketing educators, Journal of Marketing
Education, 25(3), 208-217.
Mumtaz, S. (2001). Children's enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the
school. Computers & Education, 36(4), 347-362.
Nation, I. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Nation, P. (1998). Helping learners take control of their vocabulary learning. Greta, 6(1), 9-18.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language . Portsmouth, England:
Heinemann.
Ojo, O.I. (2003). Narrative descriptive, argumentative, conversational and dilaogic speech types.
In Alabi, A.O. (Ed.). New perspectives in English language skills. Oyo: Immaculate City Publisher.Olson, R. & Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and
speech feedback. Reading and Writing, 4(2), 107-144.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading
and reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 98(3),554.
doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(02), 195-224.
Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. San Diego, CA:
Harcourt School.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill.
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Pettit, N. T., & Cockriel, I. W. (1974). A factor study of the literal reading comprehension test
and the inferential reading comprehension test. Journal of Literacy Research, 6(1), 63-75.
Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In Mayer, R
(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467-488). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and
Instruction, 12, 61-86.
Potter, C. J., Lohr, N. J., Klein, J., & Sorensen, R. J. (2000). Information & technology literacy
standards matrix. Milwaukee, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Pretorius, E. & Naudé, H. (2002). A culture in transition: Poor reading and writing ability among
children in south african townships. Early Child Development and Care, 172(5), 439-449.
Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations
as a function of proficiency. The modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.
Pringprom, P., & Obchuae, B. (2011). Relationship between vocabulary size and reading
comprehension. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Foreign Language
Learning and Teaching, 1(1). Bangkok: Language Institute, Thammasat University. ISSN
2286-8836
Rashidi, N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary
knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific
Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.
Rátiva, M., Pedreros, A., & Núñez, M. (2012). Using web-based activities to promote reading:
An exploratory study with teenagers. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional
Development, 14(2), 11-27.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about
language. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 164-201.
Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-whilelistening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading
Research Quarterly, 23(2), 219-235.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and
backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33.
Richek, M. A. (2005). Words are wonderful: Interactive, Time‐Efficient strategies to teach
meaning vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 414-423.
Roe, B., Smith, S., & Burns, P. (2011). Teaching reading in today's elementary school. Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Ryan, E. B., & Ledger, G. W. (1979). Grammaticality judgments, sentence repetitions, and
sentence corrections of children learning to read. International Journal of
Psycholinguistics, 6 (4), 23-40.
Sainsbury, M., & Benton, T. (2011). Designing a formative e‐assessment: Latent class analysis
of early reading skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 500-514.
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work?
International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
Sedig, K., Rowhani, S., Morey, J., & Liang, H. N. (2003). Application of information
visualization techniques to the design of a mathematical mindtool: A usability study.
Information Visualization, 2(3), 142-159.
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods.
Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Shohamy, E. G. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests.
Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Silva, R. (2002). The effects of hypermedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning.
Trabajo presentado en el congreso de la asociación chilena de estudios norteamericanos,
Valparaiso, Chile: Universidad de playa ancha.
Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University
Press.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of
teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 85(4), 571.
Stahl, S. A. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings. In Hiebert, E. & Kamil,
L.(Eds.), Teaching and Learning Vocabulary: Bringing Research to Practice, (pp.95-
114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sweet, A, & Snow, C. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York, NY: Guilford
Publication
The British Council. (2012). Short Stories. Contributed by © Cambridge English Online.
Torgerson, C., Zhu, D., Andrews, R., Beverton, S., Burn, A., Leach, J., Shakespeare, E. (2004).
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in
English. The Impact of ICT on Literacy Education, 5-16.
Torgesen, J., Houston, D., Rissman, L., & Kosanovich, M. (2007). Teaching all students to read
in elementary school: A guide for principals. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research
Corporation, Center on Instruction
Trim, J. L., Bailly, S., & de l'Europe, C. (2001). Common European framework of reference for
languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: A guide for users. Strasbourg, France:
Council of Europe Publications
Truscott, C. & Case, D. (1999). Issues in technology: The lure of bells and whistles choosing the
best software to support reading instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(4), 361-
369.
Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading
throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1805-1818.
Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of
constructivism.(5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.
Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice?. Australian
Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211-239.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn
bacon.
Ybarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language
skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3).
Yeeding, S. (2007). Using pre-reading activities to increase learners’ motivation in reading
comprehension: A case of 2nd year vocational students enrolled in the electrical and
electronic certificate program at industrial technology college King Mongkut. King
Mongkut.Pranakorn.
Zhang, L. J., & Anual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension the case of
secondary school students learning english in singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51-76.
Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T., Nor Rizan Tg Mohd. (2010). Looking into EFL reading
comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 439-445.
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting
findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262.
Zúñiga, G. (2003). A framework to build readers and writers in the second language classroom.
Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (5), 158-175.
262931
TE08744
Autor
Parra Pérez, Diana Angélica
Institución
Resumen
Las habilidades de comprensión lectora juegan un papel importante en el proceso de aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera, tanto para aprendices jóvenes o adultos; es bien sabido que los buenos lectores tienen éxito en el desarrollo de otras habilidades de aprendizaje de la lengua. Sin embargo, no ha habido suficiente investigación en relación al uso de estrategias tradicionales como la enseñanza del vocabulario combinada con el uso de tecnologías multimodales para promover el desarrollo de comprensión lectora. El presente estudio se baso en el desarrollo de actividades de aprendizaje de vocabulario con el fin de lograr la comprensión lectora de historias animadas. Los niveles de comprensión de lectura fueron evaluados a través de tests de comprensión con formato de verdadero/ falso y seleccion multiple basados en el contenido de las historias. Una vez terminada la implementación, se aplicaron entrevistas a estudiantes y un cuestionario a los padres de familia para conocer sus percepciones sobre las actividades desarrolladas y el uso de tecnología. Luego de analizar los datos con la teoría fundamentada en datos, se encontró que las actividades realizadas con el vocabulario y los recursos multimodales contribuyeron al mejoramiento de su comprensión de lectura literal y además, generaron emociones positivas en los estudiantes. Estos resultados muestran que el uso de estrategias tradicionales como la pre-enseñanza de vocabulario en conjunto con la implementación de tecnologías multimodales deben ser mayormente consideradas por los actores de la enseñanza de Inglés como lengua extranjera en la educación básica primaria en Colombia.