masterThesis
Developing bottom-up skills to attain spoken word recognition through phonics
Fecha
2016-04-20Registro en:
Arnold, J. (2000). Seeing through listening comprehension exam anxiety. TESOL
Quarterly, 34(4), 777-786.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Beck, D. L., & Flexer, C. (2011). Listening is where hearing meets brain... in children and
adults. Hearing Review, 18(2), 30-35.
Blachman, B. A., Tangel, D. M., Ball, E. W., Black, R., & McGraw, C. K. (1999).
Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year
intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing, 11(3), 239-
273.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2010). How to research. Buckingham: The Open
University Press
Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains,
NY: Pearson Education.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for
practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative
analysis. London: Sage.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York,
NY: Routledge.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research : Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Cove, M. (2006). Sounds familiar: The history of phonics teaching. In M. Ellis, & S. Ellis
(Eds.), Phonics: Practice, research and policy (pp. 105-112). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Paul Chapman Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (2002). What we know about how to teach
phonics. What Research has to Say about Reading Instruction, 3, 87-109.
De Saussure, F., & Baskin, W. (2011). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
Denton, C. A., Anthony, J. L., Parker, R., & Hasbrouck, J. E. (2004). Effects of two
tutoring programs on the English reading development of Spanish- English bilingual
students. Elementary School Journal, 104(4), 289.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and
isues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Deterding, D. (2004). How many vowel sounds are there in English? STETS Language &
Communication Review, 19(10), 19-21.
Dombey, H. (2006). Phonics and English orthography. In L. Maureen, & S. Ellis (Eds.),
Phonics: Practice, research and policy (pp. 95-104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Paul
Chapman Publishing.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and
mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research:
Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Downing, J. (1979). The cognitive clarity theory of learning to read. Reading and
reasoning (pp. 29-41). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1707-5_4
Ehri Linnea, C. (2003). Systematic phonics instruction: Findings of the national reading
panel. London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES)
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics
instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s
meta-analysis. ( No. 71).Sage Publications
Emanuel, R., Adams, J., Baker, K., Daufin, E. K., Ellington, C., Fitts, E., . . . Okeowo, D.
(2008). How college students spend their time communicating. International Journal
of Listening, (1), 13-28. doi:10.1080/10904010701802139
Farmer, S., Ellis, S., & Smith, V. (2006). Teaching phonics: The basics. In L. Maureen, &
S. Ellis (Eds.), Phonics: Practice, research and policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Paul
Chapman Publishing
Farokhbakht, L., & Nejadansari, D. (2015). The effect of using synthetic multisensory
phonics in teaching literacy on EFL young learners' literacy learning. International
Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(4), 39-52.
Field, J. (2010). Listening in the language classroom. ELT Journal, 64(3), 331-333.
Fitzpatrick, J. (1997). Phonemic awareness: Playing with sounds to strengthen beginning
reading skills. Grades PreK-2. Cypress, CA: Creative Teaching Press
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Frauenfelder, U. H., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An
introduction. Cognition, 25(1), 1-20.
Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and
a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 20(1), 116-129.
Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory
processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 302-310.
Gasser, M. (1990). Connectionism and universals of second language acquisition. Studies
in Second Language Acquisition, 12(02), 179-199.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded
theory. Mill Valley, CA: University of California Press
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.
Hall, K. (2006). How children learn to read and how phonics helps. In L. Maureen, & S.
Ellis (Eds.), Phonics: Practice, research and policy (pp. 9-22). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Paul Chapman Publishing
Hinkel, E. (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. New
York, NY: Routledge.
Johnston, R. S., McGeown, S., & Watson, J. E. (2012). Long- term effects of synthetic
versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys
and girls. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(6), 1365-1384.
doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x
Johnston, R. S., & Watson, J. E. (2004). Accelerating the development of reading, spelling
and phonemic awareness skills in initial readers. Reading and Writing: An
Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 327-357.
doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000032666.66359.62
Juel, C. (1994). Learning to read and write in one elementary school. New York, NY:
Springer
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford:
Pergamon
Li, M., Cheng, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2012). Phonological awareness and listening
comprehension among Chinese English-immersion students. International Education,
41(2), 46-65.
Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and
action research. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 337, a567.
doi:10.1136/bmj.39602.690162.47 [doi]
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.
Cognition, 25(1), 71-102.
Martínez, A. M. M. (2011). Explicit and differentiated phonics instruction as a tool to
improve literacy skills for children learning English as a foreign language. GIST
Education and Learning Research Journal, (5), 25-49.
Massaro, D. W. (1994). Psychological aspects of speech perception: Implications for
research and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), (pp. 219-301). San Diego. CA:
Academic Press
McCartney, E. (2006). Developmental issues: Speaking and phonological awareness. In L.
Maureen, & S. Ellis (Eds.), Phonics: Practice, research and policy (pp. 71-82).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Paul Chapman Publishing.
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). In Feldman J., Hayes P. and
Rumelhart D. E. (Eds.), The appeal of parallel distributed processing. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.
Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature
reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334-342.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. New
York, NY: Routledge.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lengua
extranjera: Inglés
Moore, E. A. (1953). Listening is a skill. The English Journal, 42(7), 378-390.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review,
76(2), 165-178. doi:10.1037/h0027366
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of
the national reading panel. teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment
of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading
instruction. ( No. NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
Noltemeyer, A. L., Joseph, L. M., & Kunesh, C. E. (2013). Effects of supplemental small
group phonics instruction on kindergartners' word recognition performance. Reading
Improvement, 50(3), 121-131.
Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. Methodology in Language Teaching: An
Anthology of Current Practice, 23(9), 238-241.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Australia: Australia : Heinle,
Cengage Learning.
Paul, P. V. (1996). First-and second-language English literacy. Volta Review, 98(2), 5.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and
learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 33, 283-319.
Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.
Cognition, 25(1), 21-52.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and
applied linguistics (4th ed.). London: Routledge
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London: Penguin.
Rost, M. (2005). L2 listening. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second
language teaching and learning (pp. 503-527). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching : Listening. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Santa, C. M., & Hoien, T. (1999). An assessment of early steps: A program for early
intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 54.
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Saxton, M. (2010). Child language: Acquisition and development. London: Sage
Publications.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University
Press.
Stuart, M. (1999). Getting ready for reading: Early phoneme awareness and phonics
teaching improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 587-605.
Stuart, M. (2004). Getting ready for reading: A follow-up study of inner city second
language learners at the end of key stage 1. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
74(1), 15-36. doi:10.1348/000709904322848806
Tomal, D. R. (2010). Action research for educators. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature
on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling DfES Publications
Nottingham.
Trehearne, M., Healy, L. H., Cantalini, M., & Moore, J. L. (2003). Comprehensive literacy
resource for kindergarten teachers. Vernon Hills, IL: ETA/Cuisenaire
Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
Valbuena, A. C. (2014). Tucker signing as a phonics instruction tool to develop phonemic
awareness in children. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, (8 Jan-Jun),
66-82.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening
comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(03), 191-210.
Vandergrift, L. (2011). Second language listening. Handbook of Research in Second
Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 455.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening:
Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N., & North, B. (2009). Common
European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment
Cambridge University Press
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R.,
. . . Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities
and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year
longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468.
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non- native spoken- word
recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1-25. doi:10.1016/S0749-
596X(03)00105-0
262032
TE08244
Autor
Maldonado Chacón, Pedro Pablo
Institución
Resumen
El propósito de esta investigación cualitativa era analizar el impacto que la instrucción explícita en “Phonics” tiene sobre el reconocimieto de los sonidos del inglés en aprendices básicos de este como lengua extranjera y así poder identificar la palabra oral. Esta destreza hace parte de las habilidades de escucha bajo el enfoque ascendente. Los participantes recibieron instrucción en cinco sonidos vocalicos /æ e ɪ ɒ ʌ/ y dos consonánticos /θ/ y /ð/ a través de lecciones estructuradas bajo los parámetros de las rutinas que desarrollan la conciencia fonémica e instrucción en “Phonics”. Otros estudios que han trabajado “phonics” se han enfocado en sus implicaciones sobre la habilidad lectora principalmente. Otros estudios se han enfocado en el uso de phonics en el aprendizaje de la lengua nativa y extranjera, sin embargo, se han dedicado a explorar sus implicaciones sobre la habilidad lectora. El presente estudio reconoce la habilidad de la escucha como la primera que abre las puertas al aprendizaje de la lengua extranjera y como la responsable de irradiar positivamente a las demás habilidades y sistemas de la lengua. Por tanto, este estudio se concentra en la habilidad de la escucha y sus resultados sugieren que la instrucción en “Phonics” es un método efectivo que ayuda a los estudiantes básicos del inglés como lengua extranjera a acceder a su forma oral ya que para el término de la implementación, la mayoría de los participantes en este estudio experimentaron una mejoría significativa en su habilidad para reconocer las palabras del inglés que escuchaban . Otros efectos de este tipo de instrucción fueron la mejora gradual de los participantes pronunciación y escritura (ortografía).